Skip to comments.Sally Yates -vs- Michael Flynn…
Posted on 04/28/2019 5:25:04 PM PDT by bitt
Prior to March 9th, 2016, the political surveillance and spy operations of the Obama administration were using the FBI and NSA database to track and monitor their opposition. However, once the NSA compliance officer began initiating an internal review of who was accessing the system, the CIA and FBI moved to create ex post facto justification for their endeavors. [Full Backstory]
After the November 8th, 2016, election everyone within the Obama network associated with the Trump surveillance operation was at risk. This is the impetus for the Muh Russia conspiracy narrative that was used as a mitigating shield. Within a few days after the election ODNI James Clapper and CIA Director John Brennan began pushing the Russia election interference narrative in the media.
Without notifying anyone, NSA Director Mike Rogers went to Trump tower on November 18th, 2016. Despite his compartmentalization it appears Rogers identified the NSA database abuse as likely the underpinning for some form of political surveillance.
By mid-December 2016 the Obama administration was deploying a full-court-press using their media allies to promote the Russia conspiracy. However, despite their public proclamations Clapper and Brennan were refusing to give any specifics to congress.
The hard narrative was that Russia interfered. That was the specific push from within the Obama intelligence apparatus writ large. All IC officials, sans Mike Rogers (NSA), had a self-interest in pushing this narrative; after all, it was the defensive mechanism to justify their illegal spying operation throughout 2016. This was their insurance policy.
The media was doing their part, and using the information leaked to them by those who were part of the 2016 operation(s), began battering the Trump transition team every hour of every day with questions about the Russia hacking narrative; thereby fertilizing the seeds of a collusion conspiracy.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
I can’t wait for the results of the investigation of the investigators!
The Joint Analysis Report (JAR) should be called the Val-Jar report. The 17 security agencies all agree talking point is like the facebook video BS Susan Rice was pushing on all the networks for the “Arab Spring” uprising!
Operation Condor How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis
Posted on January 5, 2018 by sundance
This outline is the stunning backstory to how the FBI Counterintelligence Division and DOJ National Security Division were weaponized. This outline is the full story of what House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes is currently working to expose. This outline exposes the biggest political scandal in U.S. history. This outline is also the story of how one mans action likely saved our constitutional republic.
His name is Admiral Mike Rogers.
Im calling the back-story to the 2016 FISA 702(16)(17) political corruption by the Obama administration Operation Condor. Those of you familiar with the film Three Days of The Condor will note how the real life storyline almost mirrors the Hollywood film. For the real life version, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers plays the role of Condor.
SCIF a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. To understand the larger FISA 702(16)(17) issues in 2016 it is important to focus on the word compartmented.
Intelligence information is housed by compartments. Each intelligence unit holds intelligence unique to that compartment. The FBI Counter-Intelligence Unit would hold the intelligence information specific to their task or assignment; the DOJ National Security Division would hold their own compartmented intelligence; again, specific to their task and objectives. So too would the DOJ, DoD (Pentagon), State Dept., or CIA.
This compartmented structure is what led to the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, ODNI. The 911 commission recommended the office to serve as a hub able to ensure intelligence sharing; that is to ensure intelligence was not intentionally withheld from other compartments when needed.
In 2016 the ODNI for President Obama was James Clapper.
It is doubtful the 911 commission ever gave thought to what might happen when intelligence is weaponized as a political tool. The DNI is a political appointment, a cabinet member, of the President. If the executive branch, the President, wanted to weaponize intelligence as a political tool, he/she would have control over such weaponization as an outcome of their political appointees within the: FBI (Comey, McCabe), DOJ (Lynch/Yates), CIA (Brennan), DNI (Clapper), or DoD (Ash Carter), etc.
The civilian (representative) oversight into the compartmented intelligence falls to a very select group known as the Intelligence Gang of Eight.
Four Democrats and Four Republicans (four minority party and four majority party political leaders) for a total of eight. Four from the House and Four from the Senate. Understand the Gang of Eight Here The Gang-of-Eight can, if they choose, interact with the intelligence product with the same level of security clearance as the compartment being reviewed.
Only these eight members can interact with the intelligence product in this way. This ensures their ability to conduct oversight.
It is critical to understand the difference between the House Intelligence Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Gang of Eight. Only two members from the House Intelligence Committee (chair and minority), and two members of the Senate Intelligence Committee (chair and vice-chair) are participants. The other four are Speaker of the House, minority leader of House, Leader of Senate and Minority leader of Senate. The latter four are not part of any other intel committee.
On March 20th 2017 congressional testimony, James Comey was asked why the FBI Director did not inform congressional oversight about the counterintelligence operation that began in July 2016.
FBI Director Comey said he did not tell congressional oversight he was investigating presidential candidate Donald Trump because the Director of Counterintelligence suggested he not do so.
*Very important detail.*
I cannot emphasize this enough. *VERY* important detail. Again, notice how Comey doesnt use FBI Counterintelligence Director WH Bill Priestaps actual name, but refers to his position and title. Again, watch the first three minutes:
Excerpted for the full and incredible story go to the link below.
How NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis
combatveteransforcongress.org ^ | jan 2018 | Capt Joseph R. John
Posted on 5/6/2018, 11:05:57 AM by doug from upland
The below listed material exposes how political appointees of the Obama administration weaponized the intelligence community, the FBI, and the Department of Justice to spy on a US Presidential candidate before he was elected, and for the first time in US History, attempted to initiate the removal of a the duly elected US President from office, creating a Constitutional Crisis and by so doing, dangerously dividing the American electorate, by charging that Donald Trump collude with Russia to win the presidential election, when the truth is that Hillary Clinton colluded with Russia to create and pay for a false Steele Dossier on Donald Trump.
The article further exposes how the political appointees in the Obama administration in the intelligence community, employed the fraudulently created Steele Dossier, funded by the Hillary Presidential Campaign and the Democratic Party, whose content were never verified by the political appointees at FBI Headquarters and US Justice Department Headquarters to obtain FISA Warrants. The goal was to unmask hundreds of American citizens, and to also surveil and intercept communications, phone calls, and conversations of members of the Trump Campaign and the Trump Presidential Transition Team in Trump Tower.
The hero in putting an end to these illegal and treasonous actions, at personal risk to his survival, was NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers, USN, who James Clapper tried to prevent from revealing the depth of the conspiracy, and then tried to have him removed from office.
John Brennans Contributions to Fraud Upon FISA Court
Conservative Treehouse ^ | April 6, 2018 | Sundance
Posted on 4/6/2018, 2:02:27 PM by detective
Most of the vast-Russian-conspiracy media presentations seem to start with a discussion of intelligence gathering beginning in July of 2016. The GOP convention to nominate Donald Trump was July 18-21st of 2016.
Adding to the July 2016 origination narrative FBI Director James Comey stated the counterintelligence operation against candidate Trump began in July 2016. However, not a single MSM entity has looked at the FISA-702(16)(17) abuses by the FBI and DOJ-NSD outlined by the FISA court and NSA well before July 2016.
It is a matter of unclassified public record the FBI and DOJ-NSD were allowing contractors to conduct searches of the FBI and NSA databases, and extract raw intelligence, throughout 2015 until April 28th 2016 when NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers shut down all access and initiated a compliance review.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Every time they say "17 security agencies all agree" I hear "climate scientists are unanimous that man-made global warming is a fact".
A Quiet Hero NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers Retires
Themarketswork ^ | May 5, 2018 | Jeff Carlson
Posted on 4/25/2019, 6:14:22 AM by ResistorSister
EXCERPT: There is a direct benefit from Rogers retirement. His job at the NSA complete, Admiral Rogers is now free to testify
For those less familiar, heres a timeline of events transpiring at the NSA:
November 2015-April 2016 The FBI and DOJs National Security Division (NSD) uses private contractors to access raw FISA information using To and From FISA-702(16) & About FISA-702(17) queries.
March 2016 NSA Director Rogers becomes aware of improper access to raw FISA data.
April 2016 Rogers orders the NSA compliance officer to run a full audit on 702 NSA compliance.
April 18 2016 Rogers shuts down FBI/NSD contractor access to the FISA Search System.
April-September 2016 Rogers continues his investigation.
September 26 2016 DOJs NSD Head John Carlin files the Governments proposed 2016 Section 702 certifications. The filing does not disclose the FISA Abuses. Carlin is aware of Rogers compliance review. The 2016 certifications are scheduled for Court approval on October 26, 2016.
September 27 2016 Carlin announces he is resigning. Mary McCord will later assume his position.
October 15, 2016 Carlin formally leaves the NSD.Mid-October 2016 DNI Clapper submits a recommendation to the White House that Director Rogers be removed from the NSA. Clappers effort fails.
October 20 2016 Rogers is briefed by the NSA compliance officer on the Section 702 NSA compliance audit and About query violations.
October 21 2016 Rogers shuts down all About Query activity. Rogers reports the activity to DOJ and prepares to go before the FISA Court.
October 21 2016 DOJ & FBI seek and receive a Title I FISA probable cause order authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. At this point, the FISA Court is unaware of the Section 702 violations.
October 24 2016 Rogers verbally informs the FISA Court of Section 702(17) violations.
October 26 2016 Rogers formally informs the FISA Court of 702(17) violations in writing.
October 26, 2016 The FISA Court refuses to formalize the 2016 Section 702 certifications. A complete overhaul of Section 702 processes ensues.
November 17 2016 (morning) Rogers travels to meet President-Elect Trump and his Transition Team in Trump Tower. Rogers does not inform DNI James Clapper.
November 17 2016 (evening) Trump Transition Team announces they are moving all transition activity to Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.
Even his first name is Michael.
If ever a man deserved a medal....:
Go after Yates hard, she will give it up.
Anybody who talks to FBI from here on out; One word “LAWYER”
Not one syllable more. No name. Nothing
BTW, when do defendants start challenging 302’s written after the fact? FBI has no credibility, so why should the 302’s be admissible?
and John Solomon says he has further info on early surveillance...
and John Solomon says he has further info on early surveillance...
Not only that, but if on a jury faced with fbi testimoney or “evidence,” i would take it as pure b.s. and probably political.
you’re on FIRE! :)
Gibbs’ Rule #39: There is no such thing as a coincidence.
Two very good summaries.
Have you told Liz or LS?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.