To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Interesting, the court appears to be saying Sharia is inconsistant with fairness. At least Illinois fairness.
2 posted on
04/25/2019 8:05:46 AM PDT by
SJackson
(Pilgrims, doing the jobs Americans won't do)
To: SJackson
>>>Interesting, the court appears to be saying Sharia is inconsistant with fairness. At least Illinois fairness.
Yeah interesting. But allah believers will probably use religious discrimination as a recourse in a land/majority of non-believers. i.e. our freedoms against us, further allah is perfect while man-made are not
To: SJackson
Interesting, the court appears to be saying Sharia is inconsistant with fairness. At least Illinois fairness.
No, they aren't. They didn't rule anything on the merits of using sharia law to screw her out of anything. They said that she had no representation, so the foreign divorce doesn't count. It is fully left open for them to use sharia law, as long as they're both present to argue the "court's" decision.
" He said he went to India to grant her request, asserting he and his wife were pious Muslims and the trial court had the right to consider Sharia law. But none of his arguments meant "a foreign decree should be recognized if a party did not have notice and an opportunity to defend her interest," the appellate court found. "
To: SJackson
interesting how the media does not ask our 2 newest congresswomen from ISIS how they feel about this decision. wouldn’t want to make them uncomfortable about Islam’s treatment of feminists.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson