Posted on 04/22/2019 4:15:28 PM PDT by Liberty7732
It has not even been 48 hours, and at least one major American newsroom has found a way to make the deadly Sri Lanka Easter bombings, which targeted Christians and claimed an estimated 290 lives, about right-wing fearmongering.
“Christianity under attack? Sri Lanka church bombings stoke far-right anger in the West,” reads the headline to a Washington Post article published Monday morning.
This feels like a bizarre and even more tasteless iteration of the press’ beloved “Republicans pounce” trope, where an extremely newsworthy event is used as the backdrop to a larger meta-story about how members of the Right are supposedly exploiting it for political gain.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Incredible!
So if your a Christian you are far right.
Also islamophobic if you call out islam for the killings.
Now we know which culture owns a controlling share of the stock of the WaPo.
"Officials" confirmed that the Notre Dame fire was accidental before the fire trucks even arrived.
And maybe it was, but c'mon! The place was still a massive conflagration, flames spitting hundreds of feet into the air and officials had already declared there was nothing to see here.
They must have come to their senses, because now they have an article on their front page:
Sri Lanka blames local Islamist extremist group for Easter bombings that killed 290; U.S. offers FBI assistance in probe
https://www.washingtonpost.com/
Leftists hate you and they want you dead. The people at the washington post are happy that Catholics were targeted for murder and will use this tragedy like they use all other tragedies to further their narrative.
JoMa
Revolting media pigs.
The Amazon Newsletter strikes again.
Did they mention a BACKLASH? A BACKLASH is always part of the story after a muslime outrage. We have to be careful of them you know ... those BACKLASHes. Can’t have Christians retaliating against peace-loving ‘slimes.
“Sri Lanka church bombings stoke far-right anger in the West,”
Which is a tacit admission that the left doesn’t care when Christians get murdered.
someone at the WaPo said that Trump would have been more forceful in his denunciation of the Sri Lanka killings if the victims were white. I’m forced to say that the dems/media/Soros axis would have been far more upset if the victims were Muslims. I noticed that 0bama, the Clintons and others couldn’t even bring themselves to say that the victims were Christians. Instead, they referred to them as Easter Worshippers. They also referred to the weekend as being a holy weekend for several religions.
Do we really want the F.I.B. er..., ah.... the F.B.I. involved in this?
Excellent point.
so, if 1,000 mosques were defaced, torched or bombed in the last year, if the call to prayer was silenced by noise ordinances as church bells were long ago, it would cause far-left anger?
Who stole the Bible Belt?
“Incredible!”
Wish it were, but it’s not. It’s par for their course.
don’t forget all the “good” Freepers blowing billionaire Bezos by subscribing to Amazon and excusing their gift to his hate...
Doubtful but if they are, the perps, as we have seen, are generally also mohammadens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.