Posted on 03/19/2019 3:39:34 AM PDT by Star Traveler
On Tuesday, New Zealand’s largest broadband providers published an open letter to the chief executives of Facebook, Twitter and Google, calling on them “to be a part of an urgent discussion at an industry and New Zealand government level” about how to deny access to content created by the suspected killer, Brenton Harrison Tarrant, 28.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Sorry, no ... we must develop the skills and tools to get around all this. Start practicing today. Get the video and get the manifesto. See if you can do it. Don't speculate that you can ... do it, and see. It's a good exercise.
AND ... take a close look at this video. This guy, Brenton Tarrant wasn’t insane or crazy, but he is and was very dangerous. He’s more sly and cunning than I originally thought. It’s worthwhile considering what is said in this video.
Brenton Tarrant, Acceleration & Collapse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7nXZAfDiCY
BS. They don’t want to use the killer’s name so they can continue to blame President Trump, the American people and the NRA for this shooting. The killer’s name should be plastered all over the place.
Then you’ll understand that video that I posted up above ...
Also a push on gun confiscation. His story was a rambling one but in he never mentioned maybe the real reason behind his knowing or unknowingly murderous campaign................ gun confiscation
He did mention it, as I recall. You’ll see what he is trying to do, from that video analysis, up above.
“Also a push on gun confiscation. His story was a rambling one but in he never mentioned maybe the real reason behind his knowing or unknowingly murderous campaign................ gun confiscation”
According to his manifesto, he knows that his killings will accelerate gun confiscation in the US. He then points out the ‘come and get them’ argument that many make here, and says he’s just bringing forward the day when it’s time to put up or shut up.
“Suspected.” The arsehole broadcast his crime on fakebook.
No doubt of his guilt.
And the media wants to call this terrorism, but was he a card carrying member of some officially recognized terrorist organization? Because that was the standard when Islamonazis were killing Americans while Obama was president. Anything that wasn’t officially coordinated with Al Qaeda meant you were a “lone wolf” and not “genuine terrorism”.
Plus, the Left wants to spread the big lie that Tarrant was a right-wing conservative.
That’s why they don’t want folks to read the manifesto.
I’m sure you know that using ‘suspect’ is something that is done from a legal standpoint to avoid lawsuits ... LOL ...
I’ll put it another way ... the guy himself, knows he ‘did it’ ... but yet he is going to go into court and say “Not Guilty” - simply from the standpoint of being able to present his side of things (not that he’s saying he didn’t do it).
As far as being a ‘terrorist’ ... he fits the definition perfectly, as do all those others who engaged in terrorist acts in the USA, despite what Obama wanted to call them.
NZ government is already doing the terrorists bidding by altering their laws in exactly the way he wanted. It’s a little late to be concerned about amplifying his cause.
Actually he did mention it. Straight out in his manifesto he stated he used guns to deepen US political division over gun control and to trigger a civil war. He also stated he could’ve use vehicles or explosives, but chose guns specifically for this reason.
His Cause? You mean that white Western countries are being invaded and displaced?
Of course they don’t might wake someone up.
Where John podesta been lately??
“The killer’s name should be plastered all over the place.”
Why glorify the killer? Who wants to know his name, and why should we want to know his name? Why should we want to contaminate our minds by reading his name or saying his name?
I agree with the Biblical mode of dealing with people like that. Put a black sack over his head (deny him the least bit of humanity) stand him up against a wall, and execute him in prime time immediately.
His guilt is not in question.
The “tram” shooting in Europe by the Turk this week is not being called terrorism yet. They say they are investigating all possible motives.
So honor killings etc would mean just family related murder with random victims caught in the crossfire?
Shhhh.... you’re not supposed to notice.
Why should names be released?
A - to fight the narrative that he was a “right winger”. He said he was a former Communist and former anarchist, then “libetarian” (does that Party even exist outside the US?), and is now an eco-fascist. Do the background research on the man’s prior organizational ties.
B - We were told the Olympic park bomber was “no doubt” the guy who alerted security to the threat. Only it wasn’t. If people are going to be scooped up and blamed for a crime, the names need to be released. Otherwise we risk becoming a land where people just disappear from the street never to be seen again, with no mention as to why, too bad to mention.
And as I stated, his guilt is only in question among those who argue that “innocence by reason of (temporary) insanity” is a “thing”.
Are you asking for my definition or someone else’s?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.