I’m a huge fan of Trump, but I learned very early on to ignore what he says, and focus on what he does.
It’s not his fault, except for signing Paul Ryan’s Omnibus Spending bill.
“I’m speechless”
Big Media has undertaken a major offensive lately and appreciates that response, but would have preferred something harsher.
Play on words..NEW...vs redoing old sections.
Understand the splitting of hairs here.
The press and MSM is focusing on “new” as in nothing existed prior. What they don’t want you to look at is where marginal and damaged fences have been replaced with WALLS.
I am of the opinion that if you replace a section that only has 3 strands of barbed wire or maybe a flimsy corrugated pannel with a wall, it is a new wall.
Sort of depends on how one defines the word “new” doesn’t it?
Putting up a replacement for a dilapidated section could be construed as building new, sturdier, walls.
Complete msm BS. There have been miles of new wall put up, there’s video all over youtube showing it. Replacing vehicle barriers that can be stepped over with a 30’ wall is new wall. Not to mention wall out in the desert that has been added. Never Trumpers, bitter POSs can’t do anything bit bitch, wishing hillary had won.
I stopped at ‘Daily Mail’
Come on.
I’ve watched numerous videos of wall being put into the ground. I’m reluctant to believe this.
Drain Da Swamp;Get Ridda gubmint, ‘ceptTRUMP.45!—POTUS.45!contract out ONLY wtf “we” really need/ant!
SemperTRUMP.45!
GyG@PlanetWTF?
********************
Any way you look at it, the fault lies on those opposing the wall.
This is a problem. Is Trump telling the truth or not?
I am a bottom line kind of a person.
To me the bottom line is this: Is there anything that the President can do that won’t be overruled by a lefty judge, usually in the Ninth Circuit.
Build the wall, don’t build the wall, what good is any of it if some judge rules that wall or no wall we must allow asylum seekers to enter with impunity? We have a problem in this country and, if nothing else, Trump has exposed it. We have a permanent government that could care the less about what the people who choose the elected government want.
The permanent government is gonna do what they gonna do and just say to you and I “screw you.”
As for new or old wall, it doesn’t matter if the old wall sucks. The old walls were usually built at the areas that needed them the most. If they want to start by upgrading there, I am for it.
Makes total sense. The existing walls being replaced with NEW walls were put where they were most needed in the first place.
Yeah, okay, fake news.
The Daily Mail are bullsh*tters.
New Wall is going up:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/20/president_trump_tweets_video_of_border_wall_construction.html
And it’s new wall with much more to come.
It takes time to buy the real estate, to contract manufacturers, to lay out the project schedule.
Put differently, the real battle over the border is not in whether a wall is built or not. Given what the judiciary is doing, the real battle is for Beotch McConnell to end the democrats slow walk of Trump’s judicial nominees and install ones who will at least give the administration a fair shot in court.
A word on Conservative judges: We all expect that a conservative judge will act like a liberal judge. Namely, we expect our guys to decide on a result and then manufacture some mumbo jumbo to justify it. That is not what a conservative judge does. They look at the case and apply the law. That means that if congress has pooped the bed and not altered the law to allow the result we want, we don’t get the result we want.
To the media and the democrats it’s only a campaign promise.
Something to be used and discarded once elected.
To the people of the nation it’s a new stout front door
that you don’t have to leave open so anyone can come move
in with you.
They are building in April just in time for the illegals mating season.