Posted on 03/14/2019 9:45:31 PM PDT by Trump20162020
A ‘BRITISH’ gunman who is believed to have filmed himself slaughtering Muslims in a New Zealand mosque wrote a chilling manifesto before the “terrorist attack”.
The white-supremacist shooter, 28, who was born in Australia, said he wanted to take revenge for the "thousands of European lives lost to terror attacks".
He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.
“Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states," he wrote.
“This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”
The suspected shooter described himself as an "ordinary white man born in Australia to a working class,low income family."
(Excerpt) Read more at thesun.co.uk ...
it only gettings a passing “acknowledgment” that the article was “updated”. No apology. No retraction.
The Aussie PM called it a right wing extremist attack.
The militant Left needs to eat crow.
>>Between this and the unexplained plane crash in Ethiopia, there is also some good reason to keep a close eye on enemy states who may have chosen this time to destabilize the United States.
The shooter says the goal was to provoke civil unrest in the United States. How does banning more guns in the US change anything that happens in NZ?
The US government only ran guns to Islamonazis in Libya and narcoterrorists in Mexico while Obama was President.
Sounds like a nut to me. Doubt that New Zealand has a death penalty. Liberals ruined that nice island long ago.
This is still a great tragedy and needs to be condemned by civilized people of all persuasions.
Am I a bad person if I just dont care?
I don’t even know how much of Bugliosi’s claim of a Manson “conspiracy to create a race war” was accurate (vs. his own ‘conspiracy theory’).
Manson was guilty of torture and murder. The possible motives may have been drug dealing, prostitution, human trafficking, etc. They had their ties to the Hollywood entertainment community (name producers, actors, musicians).
Bugliosi later wrote a book urging the prosecution of GW Bush for “murder”.
You may not care about the victims, but the subsequent profiling and legislation will affect you one way or another.
Exactly.
It's Brit tabloid press, and some of the worst of that large field.
Putting "Trump" in the top line will get them a few more clicks so they do, never mind the facts of the matter.
No you’re not.
I think this attack should not be a surprise to any who understand the world and what has been happening over the years. I believe global leaders knew their agenda would bring these events and they are willing to tolerate these with their false assumption things will quiet down and we’ll all live together happily ever after.
LOL
“Dear God no...”
Yep, there’s a die-hard right leaning individual. Cough, cough..., hack spit.
Here’s a thought. Will we be protected
from an anti-Anglo backlash? Muslims
demand it of us in similar circumstances.
The gunman ain’t a Trump supporter, not that’ll stop the fake news.
Death toll now at 49
from Brenton Tarrant’s manifesto. have seen people quoting it online, but so far have only found OpIndia reporting it. FakeNewsMSM have their own agenda:
15 Mar: OpIndia: Terrorist who attacked New Zealand mosque said China is closest to his political and social values
The manifesto was uploaded on document sharing website Scribd by Matthew Keys, an independent journalist based in San Francisco, but the document was later removed.
by OpIndia staff
The manifesto was created on January 21st and was updated yesterday before the shooting took place...
The journalist confirmed that the document was not removed by him...
However, the terrorist says that he is not a conservative since conservatism is corporatism in disguise. To the questions of whether he is a ‘left-wing’ or a ‘right-wing’, the terrorist has no answer in particular and to both, he says it depends on the definition that people attach to it.
He says that depending on the definition attached to Socialism, he could certainly be one. He says if the definition means workers’ ownership of the means of production, then it would depend on who those workers are and what their intent is and who currently ‘owns the state’.
To the question about whether he was a fascist, he says “The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China”...
He says that when he was young, he was a communist, then an anarchist and finally, a libertarian before coming to be an ‘eco-fascist’...
https://www.opindia.com/2019/03/terrorist-who-attacked-new-zealand-mosque-said-china-is-closest-to-his-political-and-social-values/
the shooter is a big leftist.
The Sun is a leftist rag and lies.
No he isn’t insane. Not at all.
He had a leftist POV and He was a self admitted fascist.
THIS IS WHAT LEFTIST FASCISTS DO.
It has nothing to do with insanity and everything to do with imposing their will at all costs.
read his manifesto, there is no PS in it.
He is a Leftist Fascist
He is not mad he is a Lefist Fascist.
Stop calling evil crazy.
I asked why they were removed from breaking news.
Leftists want the whole world to fight.
Leftists want the entire systems to fail, for they believe then that their ideology will be pure and dominate. And their opposers will die.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.