Posted on 02/20/2019 12:25:38 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
She'd have to move to Minnesota for that.
So how is she going to win the Democrat nomination for 2020 now?
Germany’s Merkel will most likely take her in. *SPIT*
Absolutely
Keep her and the terrorist cub out of here.
We know muslims lie in order to get a foothold
From the article:
Muthana, 24, has pleaded with officials to let her back into the U.S. following her recent escape from ISIS and capture by Kurdish forces. She was born in 1994 in Hackensack, New Jersey.
It’s unclear the exact provision the State Department is using to deem Muthana not a citizen.
But it could be because Muthana’s father was a diplomat, something her legal representative, Hassan Shibly, acknowledged Wednesday.
According to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, children born in the United States to accredited foreign diplomatic officers do not acquire citizenship under the 14th Amendment since they are not born subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. at the time.
However, Shibly says Muthana’s father stopped being a diplomat months before Hoda was born in New Jersey.
Either her father was a foreign diplomat at the time of her birth, OR she catagorically and clearly renounced her citizenship.
Those are the only ways she could not be a citizen.
She’ll just sneak across the border from Mexico.
The born on U.S. soil thing is like the constitutional right to abortion. The constitution doesn't mention abortion at all and neither does it say being a natural born citizen is defined by location of birth instead of parents' citizenship status. But the left tells us over & over & over & over that's what the Constitution says in the hope that we'll keep believing it.
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
"Born in the United States" seems fairly obvious. What does "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" mean?
Apparently, accredited diplomats aren't; the argument seems to be that their children aren't either, regardless of where they're born.
Taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or its political subdivisions after the age of 18 is an expatriating act and the person doing so forfeits their citizenship. That should be enough to keep her out.
It means if you break our laws then you can be arrested and tried. Foreign diplomats enjoying diplomatic immunity are not subject to our jurisdiction and their children born here are not citizens per the 14th Amendment.
Sneak?
Sneak!
Who the hell sneaks now...they just stroll across as if they owned the damn place.
Build the freakin' wall!
We don’t want her back in Alabama
When illegal aliens break our laws, we arrest them, try them, (sometimes) convict them, and (sometimes) imprison them. That makes illegal aliens "subject to the jurisdiction of [the United States]" ... and it makes their children born here, citizens of the United States.
It does.
I would refer you to Clay Blair’s excellent study of the Korean War, “The Forgotten War”, page 146. I quote LTC Mike Michaelis, who had just been given command of the US Army’s 27th Wolfhound Regiment, and was ordered to immediately deploy from Japan to Korea in July of 1950. “We’d just had our first child-a daughter. The only thing I had time to do was rush to the American Consulate with my wife and get our daughter certified so that SHE WOULDN’T BE A JAPANESE CITIZEN. I put twenty-five dollars, a razor, and tooth brush in my pocket and took off.” His daughter was born in the US Army hospital on Honshu.
Japan had regained it’s sovereignty at that time, and it’s citizenship laws were in effect. Japanese citizenship law held that ANYONE born on Japanese soil was a Japaneses citizen. However, the US and Japan had concluded Status of Forces Agreements concerning the children born to US military personnel on Japanese soil. US military bases were LEASED from the Japaneses government to the US for use as bases. They were still considered to be Japanese soil. If they were US soil, then the child of a pregnant Japanese worker delivering on a US base would be a 14th amendment citizen, just as if she had delivered in the US Embassy, which is US soil. With the SOFA agreement in place at that time, the Japanese citizenship of their daughter was waived, and the child would be exclusively a US citizen, (not natural born, but by US immigration and naturalization statutes extant at the time,(in the manner of Ted Cruz)
Both Michaelis AND his wife were natural born US citizens, serving their country overseas. Despite this, the location of their daughter’s birth makes her not even a 14th amendment citizen, but a statute citizen via the existing US Immigration and Naturalization laws.
“Americans wake up! Men and women altogether. You have much to do while you live under our greatest enemy, enough of your sleeping!” she once wrote, according to The Guardian. “Go on drivebys, and spill all of their blood, or rent a big truck and drive all over them. Veterans, Patriots, Memorial, etc day … Kill them.”
So what is the hesitation about executing these people?
Just to do it ! For humanity’s sake , one quick pop behind the ear and end of the problem . Next....
Two people who wrote the 14th amendment, including John Bingham who wrote the Citizenship Clause (containing the "jurisdiction thereof"), said it meant "every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen".
http://www.federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction/
So former slaves had no allegiance to the nations they had been pulled out of. They had "no foreign allegiance". In fact, many of the newly freed slaves were born in the U.S. (with the transatlantic slave trade banned in the U.S., though impossible to enforce completely while fighting the Barbary Wars, War of 1812, and Mexican American War, the end result is almost every former slave was born in the U.S. and never had any allegiance to an African nation as many didn't know even where their great great great grandparents were abducted from.
Indigenous folks, however, were still counting themselves as being subject to a foreign nation (foreign to the U.S.). So their kids weren't U.S. citizens.
Another example of where it should be obvious is the naturalization process requiring new citizens to renounce their allegiance to other nations.
https://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/naturalization-test/naturalization-oath-allegiance-united-states-america
[So how is she going to win the Democrat nomination for 2020 now?]
I believe Hawaii’s Department of Health will find a way to help her out....
By this logic, (I think), illegal aliens have no legal right to be here and no legal (or any other) allegiance to the United States. Their allegiance is only to their countries of origin. Therefore, their children inherit their allegiance (to a foreign country), they are not “subject to the laws of [the United States”, and are NOT citizens.
This is the opposite conclusion from #31 and #34.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.