Skip to comments.Nadler (D) Suggests a Dem President Can Seize Guns After Trumpís National Emergency Precedent
Posted on 02/18/2019 3:55:36 PM PST by SkyPilot
click here to read article
Give it a try, fat boy. I dare you. I double dare you
Good I want to see Nadler at the very front of the SS as they house to house. What a Coward and a Jackass!!!!!!!!!!!
a future Democratic president could try confiscate citizens' guns
Try it Fatso. Before you do, Google the Bill of Rights and then the American Revolutionary War.
Not going to happen, Jaba
This is absurd.
If the next time we have a Democrat president, he/she decides to do something with a pen and a phone, issue exec orders as Obama did with DACA, etc. then he/she will do it.
And they will declare a national emergency, regardless of whether Trump had done so in this case or not.
Maybe irrelevant, but, what they heck are Democrats saying? That they would declare a national emergency someday, in retaliation for Trump taking this action? Are we six years old, a 6 year old mentality in the Democrat party?
Why are there so many idiot liars in the RAT party?
And who exactly is Fat Nadler going to send out to take my guns?
No, how about no.
This is so stupid. A dim president will try anything he thinks he can get away with, regardless of President Trump’s actions. Obummer already proved this.
Wrong, there is no constitutional amendment guaranteeing an open border a-hole.
Take guns away....What could possibly go wrong?
He will send the FBI, or Cops, or make sure to raise your taxes or insurance or some scheme of that kind.
He’s wrong again.
Trump did not stretch or violate in any way the Constitution in delaring an emergency.
Going after guns is violating the Constitution, as well as several SCOTUS rulings upholding the 2nd.
400M privately owned weapons in the U.S. vote “no” to seizure.
What a jagoff. Securing the border IS a Constitutional power. Gun bans are Constitutionally prohibited.
Well, protecting the country from invasion IS in the constitution, opening the borders to invasion is not.
The right to keep and bear arms IS in the constitution, seizing your guns is not.
So, Nadler, GFY.
I’m your huckleberry NoNads
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.