Skip to comments.Presidential candidate Amy Klobuchar refutes Trump questioning whether climate change is real
Posted on 02/11/2019 12:30:28 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
When it’s hot, that’s “climate.”
When it’s cold, that’s “weather.”
Only a climate scientist can understand such things.
Did she make that pronouncement on the “cli-fi” network?
Did she make that pronouncement on the cli-fi network?
One wishes these scam artists would take the hint that their scam is fading. Of course true criminals never give up the con.
How queer. 20 years ago the scientists were saying that there would be no more snow in England by this date.
But heavy snow doesn’t mean that things didn’t get warmer.
Bullstalin. It is hysteria from Marxists hellbent on derailing industrialisn in Western civilization. China and India can poot and pollute all they want but not the mean ol’ USA.
“Just this last year it was one of the four hottest years in the history of the world.”
Well, dang. I stand refuted in the face of superior knowledge.
(Hey! Where’s my Joey G fix?)
What is the temperature supposed to be?
Doesn’t have the sense to hold rally indoors....
Amy - Climate change has always been happening since the beginning of the Earth. Man-made Climate Change is a hoax, concocted for the communist take over of the USA.
40 years ago, we were going to be under a glacier again by now
But in 5,000 years the oceans will rise two feet. Or not, no one will be around to be held accountable.
Our efforts to fight glocal cooling worked then, just too much though.
Depends on which society thinks they should grow the crops.
Literally walked right into that one.
These people are so stupid.
> we know climate change is happening
Amy, over the last 30 years what predictions have the scientists gotten right? I can list a dozen they’ve been wrong about. Following the scientific method, we can’t assume as theory is credible until it passes some tests to validate it. If you won’t follow the scientific method, you are denying science.
If we move beyond science (since you probably don’t have a clue about that), what predictions have activist been right about? Ice-free arctic? Polar bear decline? End of snow in the NW US? We’ve had plenty of predictions from activists, and credibility depends on being right at least some of the time.
So, what have scientists or activists been right about in the past that leads to you trust predictions on the future? Or do you deny that the scientific method should be applied to climate science?
climate change...winter....spring...summer...fall....thats it Amy...thats all there is dip sjkt!
Amy,Amy,Amy. You ignoramus. Had you been awake during 7th grade geography you would have learned that the very spot you’re standing on has been under a MILE of ice at least 5 times during the last million years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.