Posted on 02/06/2019 12:46:28 PM PST by SeekAndFind
I believe her !!!!
We’re supposed to ignore her even though she has zero partisan motive unlike Dr. Blasé Fraud in her accusations.
Are we still within the statute of limitations for her to file legal charges? If so, for her to be believed, she needs to file. Otherwise she needs to shut up.
I know that women will say that it’s hard to get justice for sex crimes, etc. But, women should not be able to go out and drop these bombs, and not take legal action to back up their claims.
Christine Ford and Democrats dropped their bomb on Kavanaugh, and faced no consequences. This woman apparently will face no consequences. Anybody can say anything about anyone. Women should not be able to drop the bombs and face no consequences for their behavior.
We must believe all women. Right?
Ironically, Tyson’s Corner is in Fairfax County.
For democrats, that is really “#believewhitewomen”.
> Thirteen years is a looooong time to hold a grudge over romantic rejection, though.
He doesn’t understand women AT ALL.
The apparent absence of partisan motive makes this accusation all the stinkier.
She gives an account of a violent sexual assault but told no one about it at the time, did not file a police report either. So no evidence exists that it happened.
The period of time during which she claims to have told other parties about it precisely coincides with the hoax against Kavanaugh, as well as precisely mirroring the Blasey-Ford tale.
In addition she’s also a professor at Stanford U, Behavioral Sciences Division, and retained the same lawyers. Amazing coincidence, don’t you think?
But the real clincher is that yes in fact she has a very specific political motive, due to what she does over there at Behavioral Sciences:
““Vanessa Tyson will use her fellowship year to research the politics and policies surrounding sexual violence against women and children in the United States. More specifically, she will explore political discourse surrounding sexual assault, corresponding policies, and the unique identities of sexual assault survivors,” the description on the Stanford University Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences reads.”
And of course the charge is unfalsifiable, and indistinguishable from post-voluntary-encounter regret.
This stinks to high heaven as another hoax, no matter who is being accused.
Must be Blase Ford is running seminars in CA for female college professors - not much difference in the narrative...
Well, at least this one can’t be accused of being a bigot because she’s black and he’s black. Oh! My! What should we do?
Wonder if this will EVER end?
He’s a black Democrat......gotta be a Lie !!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!
Okay, here’s the thing I have never understood about Women who are being forced to blow a guy.
Why didn’t she just bite it even to the point of being detached? It’s one thing if they have a gun or knife held to their head but absent that...
I personally can not think of a more compromising position than having my unit in someone’s mouth that has teeth and not wanting to do that.
Yes, but Democrats have a tendency to be rapey scumbags, so I believe her.
Why !?!
I mean other than for ‘hoisting them on their own petard’ ?
Violent ? I must have missed the part where she talked about violence in the letter.
Pehraps you can elucidate where the violence was for the rest of us.
Sorry, didn’t realize English wasn’t everybody’s first language.
As per the dictionary, the definition of “force” as used in this context:
“The use of physical power or violence to compel or restrain: a confession obtained by force.”
And where does she Claimthat he forced her mouth open?
You’re going to argue that the alleged act, him shoving his schlong into her unwilling mouth while holding her head in place to force her, is not violence?
Really?
Y U DO DIS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.