Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Push Plan to Increase Social Security Benefits and Solvency
The New York Times ^ | 03 Feb 2019 | Robert Pear

Posted on 02/03/2019 7:09:40 PM PST by Theoria

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-185 next last
To: Theoria

I plan to start drawing SS in two years.... I’m all for it.

Screw all them young lib’ruls .


61 posted on 02/03/2019 8:00:40 PM PST by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pirate Ragnar; JoSixChip

” lifelong parasites.”

Since Social Security is only paid to people who earned wages (and had taxes withheld) for a prescribed number of years, it’s hard to see them as parasites.


62 posted on 02/03/2019 8:01:08 PM PST by rintintin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Exactly......


63 posted on 02/03/2019 8:02:40 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
We need a constitutional amendment setting a maximum limit on the total income taxes any individual can be forced to pay. This should include federal, state and local income taxes as well as payroll taxes and capital gains. Pick a number. I'll suggest 25 percent as a starting point for discussion.

Even better would be an end to progressive taxation. At the soundbite level, we can defend proportional taxation. Let everyone pay the same rate. If the dems want 90 percent tax rates, they have to hit everyone.

64 posted on 02/03/2019 8:02:54 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

It doesn’t matter how they used the money...It was OUR money they took and it’s OUR money we are getting back...I don’t care if the serial numbers are different...


65 posted on 02/03/2019 8:05:00 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

From watching Judge Judy, I get the impression half the country is on SSI, too disabled to hold down a job but captain of the bowling team.


66 posted on 02/03/2019 8:05:23 PM PST by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

The amount of SS you get is based on your last 10 years income, not welfare...


67 posted on 02/03/2019 8:07:52 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

An insurance program that forcibly takes your money and gives it to others is not insurance by any definition. Money taken from one person and given to another is called welfare.

You can pretend it is something else if it makes you feel better about taking it from a working person.


68 posted on 02/03/2019 8:09:21 PM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
The Democrats voted a later retirement age for millions of us and made it effective LONG after they would be out of office. A lot of them need to be punished for that. Really.
69 posted on 02/03/2019 8:11:35 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

Go back to the original way of funding the Federal Government. Each state is apportioned a percentage of the federal budget cost and is responsible for that amount. If they don’t pay then their representatives lose their votes. So California, with 12% of the population would be responsible for 12% of the federal budget.


70 posted on 02/03/2019 8:12:19 PM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

An insurance program that forcibly takes your money and gives it to others is not insurance by any definition.

I left out the word, “compulsory.” It’s a compulsory insurance program. And all insurance programs transfer money from some premium payers to other premium payers, depending on who is receiving benefits at any point in time.


71 posted on 02/03/2019 8:14:28 PM PST by rintintin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949; Captain Peter Blood

Donald Trump at 2013 CPAC conference: “As Republicans, if you think you are going to change very substantially for the worse Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security in any substantial way, and at the same time you think you are going to win elections, it just really is not going to happen,” Mr. Trump said, adding that polls show that tea partyers are among those who don’t want their entitlements changed. “What we have to do and the way we solve our problems it to build a great economy.”


72 posted on 02/03/2019 8:16:50 PM PST by rintintin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

They didn’t say which century it would be solvent. I think they mean last century.


73 posted on 02/03/2019 8:19:08 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie ("The MSM is the enemy of the American people"...Democrat Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

Even better would be an end to progressive taxation.

I used to agree with you. But I now see the billionaire class as out to get people like me, average middle class Americans. they seek to flood the country with Third World low-wage workers, and off shore the rest of our industry to China and India. These selfish billionaires can and should be taxed heavily, in my opinion.


74 posted on 02/03/2019 8:19:36 PM PST by rintintin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949
The amount of SS you get is based on your last 10 years income, not welfare...

Completely wrong. It is based on your best 35 years of SS income. If you do not have 35 years, they use a base amount for each year you are short. Look it up in s ssa.gov
75 posted on 02/03/2019 8:20:17 PM PST by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: rintintin; Pirate Ragnar
Since Social Security is only paid to people who earned wages

Everyone is eligible at some point for social security, you do not even have to be American. There are several ways to qualify, go to ssn.gov and look it up. There is also a floor, lowest possible benefit, amount that is paid. This bill is about rising that floor.
76 posted on 02/03/2019 8:32:35 PM PST by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

Too many people still do not understand this. They still think the benefits they will receive are the taxes they and their employers paid into the system. Not true and it hasn’t been true for a long time. The system never factored in increases in life expectancy, the uneven population growth over time, not to mention the expansion of benefits with SSDI. Even if the government never borrowed a dime from Social Security, the Ponzi-like structure of the system would eventually cause it to go broke.


77 posted on 02/03/2019 8:37:56 PM PST by freedomispriceless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: Theoria

Life Expectancy has increased by 20% since SS began.

Even when Reagan made changes to the Program, they increased the so called Full Benefit Age from 65 to 67 but the “Early” Benefit age remained the same at 62. I guess they didn’t want to rock the Boat too much back then.

Want to keep SS solvent (yeah, I know), start increasing the Eligibility Age by one Month a Year for the next 36 Years. That would put the “early” Benefit age at 65 and the Full Benefit Age at 70.

All those younger People complaining that will never see a dime might actually receive a dime.

Want to save more Money, get a handle of Social Security Disability Fraud and adjust the Medicare Eligibility Age for Medicare to at least 68. 65 is the new 55 nowadays.


80 posted on 02/03/2019 9:06:16 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson