Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Once again, Trump trumps Pelosi. You hit him, he hits you back twice as hard.


2 posted on 01/31/2019 12:31:56 PM PST by Quality_Not_Quantity (Even my cat voted Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Quality_Not_Quantity
Once again, Trump trumps Pelosi. You hit him, he hits you back twice as hard.

He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue.


7 posted on 01/31/2019 12:40:19 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Quality_Not_Quantity

Trump knew DemoKKK rats wouldn’t take the deal. That’s why he offered it.


21 posted on 01/31/2019 1:11:01 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Quality_Not_Quantity

Petty Pelosi smashing back by de-funding ICE.


24 posted on 01/31/2019 1:32:18 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Quality_Not_Quantity

N0te all the wailing and gnashing of teeth among a group of freepers when Trump made the offer. Some of us knew better and several said that that deal would never happen. Trump would not have made the offer did he think it would be accepted. Watch Trump overwhelm the Democrats at the SOTU.


25 posted on 01/31/2019 1:37:03 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Quality_Not_Quantity

Pretty simple - that offer was rejected last weekend and just rejected again by Pelosi. As under basic contract law, that offer was clearly no longer available for acceptance as of last weekend. Trump simply had to remind ignorant law makers what the laws they are passed state on offer, rejection and acceptance.


41 posted on 01/31/2019 2:43:45 PM PST by GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Quality_Not_Quantity
No, I believe he woke up to where he said that DACA was not constitutional and needed to go to the USSC.

If he started making deals that ultimately support an unconstitutional freedom destroyer, how would he look? Not good in most open minded peoples thoughts.

76 posted on 02/01/2019 1:48:13 AM PST by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson