Skip to comments.Hagfish Haunts Darwin. A zombie hagfish rises from the dead, and scares Darwin from two directions.
Posted on 01/25/2019 10:46:35 AM PST by fishtank
Hagfish Haunts Darwin
A zombie hagfish rises from the dead, and scares Darwin from two directions.
January 24, 2019 | David F. Coppedge
Hagfish are eel-like fish that look like creatures from a horror movie. Their tapir-like snouts are scary enough, but when threatened, they have a unique weapon: slime! They can spread a net of sticky slime around them that can clog the gills of an attacker. And they have been doing this for at least 100 million Darwin Years, perhaps 300 million.
(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...
Darwin died in 1882.
I doubt he very much cares about any stupid fish.
Because.. you know.. dead and all.
Not a Pelosi thread?
“Darwin” in the title is personified by his modern day acolytes.
I don't how this logically follows.
I have something today. I had this thing 100 million years ago. Therefore, it accumulated gradually. WHAT?!? This is actually evidence of an absence of evolution within the chosen timeframe.
Like any theory, it explains a lot.
Saying that we do not understand a particular example only means we do not understand a particular example.
It does not invalidate Darwinian theory.
He was British. They eat weird things.................
‘It does not invalidate Darwinian theory.’
on this forum, less than that invalidates Darwin...
OK so they evolved to do this.
You need to understand TToE to attack it.
You don’t nor do the authors.
The YECers do not understand science nor what a Scientific Theory is.
They think it “Guess->Hypothesis->Theory”
Of course that is not science at all (and if it was then AGW would qualify which it does not for the same reason YEC does not).
It is sad that these ignoramuses come here from time to time to give liberals ammunition.
you might like this humblegunner..
Do the people at “Creation Evolution Headlines” ever do any original research?
>>Darwin in the title is personified by his modern day acolytes.<<
And if you can’t tell the difference between TToE and AGW and why the first is science and the latter not it just tells everyone how little you understand the subject matter of your post.
This post makes the author the sandy/alex occasional-cortex of science. And you as a follower.
>>Do the people at Creation Evolution Headlines ever do any original research?<<
They have mindless followers, why actually think it through?
AIG is worse but not that much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.