Mark Levin: Dr. Paul Kengor; Ted Kennedy Asked USSR to Help Fix the ’84 Election

Many Sources Linked | Jan 13, 2019 | Paul Kengor

[Yosemitest]

I was watching Life, Liberty, & Levin with Mark Levin interviewing Dr. Paul Kengor and the first 29 minutes are well worth your time.

41:18 - On Sunday, Mark and Senior Director of The Center for Vision and Values, Dr. Paul Kengor.
They discussed the Soviet collusion, from a Democrat style.

Let's start with the english translation of the KGB Letter of May 14, 1983 written by Viktor Chebrikov to Andropov.
It can be found in Dr. Paul Kengor's book, Dupes: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century
The Appendix of the book includes the KGB memo in both the original Russian and an English translation on pages 497-505.



Appendix
TEXT OF KGB LETTER ON SENATOR TED KENNEDY
_________________________________________ 

Special Importance
Committee on State Security of the USSR
14.05. 1983 No. 1029 Ch/OV
Moscow On 9-10 May of this year, Senator Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant J. Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Center Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.

Regarding Senator Kennedy’s request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party Comrade Y.V. Andropov

Comrade Y.V. Andropov

 

Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations. Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.

According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the “success of Reaganomics.”

Naturally, not everything in the province of economics has gone according to Reagan’s plan. A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that many bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party. Nevertheless, there are no secure assurances this will indeed develop.

The only real threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations. These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign. The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States. The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth. In political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress, the resistence to growing military expenditures is gaining strength.

However, according to Kennedy, the opposition to Reagan is still very weak. Reagan’s adversaries are divided and the presentations they make are not fully effective. Meanwhile, Reagan has the capabilities to effectively counter any propaganda. In order to neutralize criticism that the talks between the USA and the USSR are non-constructive, Reagan will grandiose, but subjectively propagandistic. At the same time, Soviet officials who speak about disarmament will be quoted out of context, silenced or groundlessly and whimsically discounted. Although arguments and statements by officials of the USSR do appear in the press, it is important to note the majority of Americans do not read serious newspapers or periodicals.

Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people. In this regard, he offers the following proposals to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Y.V. Andropov:

1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.

If his proposals would be accepted in principle, Kennedy would send his representative to Moscow to resolve questions regarding organizing such a visit.

Kennedy thinks the benefits of a meeting with Y.V.Andropov will be enhanced if he could also invite one of the well known Republican senators, for example, Mark Hatfield. Such a meeting will have a strong impact on American and political circles in the USA (In March of 1982, Hatfield and Kennedy proposed a project to freeze the nuclear arsenals of the USA and USSR and pblished a book on the theme as well.)

2. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary to the American people will, without a doubt, attact a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.

 

If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.

Furthermore, with the same purpose in mind, a series of televised interviews in the USA with lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military would be organized. They would also have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR, with their own arguments about maintaining a true balance of power between the USSR and the USA in military term. This issue is quickly being distorted by Reagan’s administration.

Kennedy asked to convey that this appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is his effort to contribute a strong proposal that would root out the threat of nuclear war, and to improve Soviet-American relations, so that they define the safety of the world. Kennedy is very impressed with the activities of Y.V. Andropov and other Soviet leaders, who expressed their commitment to heal international affairs, and improve mutal understandings between peoples.

The senator underscored that he eagerly awaits a reply to his appeal, the answer to which may be delivered through Tunney.

Having conveyed Kennedy’s appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Tunney also explained that Senator Kennedy has in the last few years actively made appearances to reduce the threat of war. Because he formally refused to partake in the election campaign of 1984, his speeches would be taken without prejudice as they are not tied to any campaign promises. Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future). Taken together, Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president. This would explain why he is convinced that none of the candidates today have a real chance at defeating Reagan.

We await instructions.

President of the committee
V. Chebrikov

Now to understand the events surrounding this, let's go to The Ted Kennedy Scandal Worse Than Chappaquiddick from May 14, 2018, by Dr. Paul Kengor:

... On the evening of March 23, 1983, President Ronald Reagan disclosed to the world a secret he had shared with only his most trusted advisers. “My fellow Americans,” he declared in a nationally televised address, “tonight we’re launching an effort which holds the promise of changing the course of human history.” The president announced his Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), a vision for a space-based missile-defense system.

Not even twenty-four hours after Reagan’s speech, Senator Ted Kennedy rushed to the Senate floor to rebuke the president for “misleading Red-scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.” The “Star Wars” term of derision immediately struck a chord. The New York Times included it in headlines typed the same day Kennedy gave his speech. “Star Wars” became the epithet of choice to ridicule SDI throughout the Reagan administration.

The liberal intelligentsia was having a terrific laugh at the expense of Reagan’s supposed Tinseltown fantasy.

But Moscow wasn’t laughing.

Reagan’s SDI speech, coming only two weeks after his famous “Evil Empire” speech, sent the Soviets into a panic. The intelligence streaming into the CIA made clear that the Soviet leadership was terrified. Herb Meyer, special assistant to CIA director William Casey, was in the rarest of positions, able to observe simultaneously the Soviets’ private response to SDI and the American liberals’ public denouncements. He recalls the jarring contrast between the Kremlin’s frightened reaction and Kennedy’s dismissive caricature. “I had Kennedy saying that on my radio,” says Meyer, “and on my desk [I had] the report from Moscow showing the Soviet leadership saying, effectively, ‘Oh, no, it’s over.’”

Ted Kennedy unwittingly handed Moscow a glistening pearl of propaganda with which to publicly attack Reagan’s powerful idea.

Ted Kennedy’s Russian Romance
For whatever reason, Senator Kennedy liked the Soviets. And he thought they liked him—when, in fact, they used him, wining and dining and duping him.

An eyewitness to this was Yuri Bezmenov, a journalist and editor for Novosti, the Soviet press agency (where he also worked for the KGB), before he defected to the West in the 1970s. Among Bezmenov’s chief duties was to handle Western visitors through propaganda and misinformation. “One of my functions,” recalled Bezmenov in a 1984 television interview, “was to keep foreign guests permanently intoxicated from the moment they landed at Moscow airport.” He would “accompany groups of so-called ‘progressive intellectuals’—writers, journalists, publishers, teachers, professors of colleges. . . . For us, they were just a bunch of political prostitutes to be taken advantage of.”

Bezmenov had come to see the rotten totalitarianism of the Soviet system and was quite bothered that these Western progressives could not discern the obvious. “I did my job,” he lamented, but “deep inside I still hoped that at least some of these useful idiots [would catch on].”

Among the worst of them, said Bezmenov, was Senator Ted Kennedy.

Pointing to a photo that he said showed Ted Kennedy dancing at a wedding at Moscow’s Palace of Marriages, Bezmenov stated, “Another greatest example of monumental idiocy [among] American politicians: Edward Kennedy was in Moscow, and he thought that he’s a popular, charismatic American politician, who is easygoing, who can smile, [who can] dance at a wedding at Russian Palace of Marriages. What he did not understand—or maybe he pretended not to understand—is that actually he was being taken for a ride.” Bezmenov noted that Kennedy, in this particular instance, was participating in a “staged wedding used to impress foreign media—or useful idiots like Ed Kennedy. Most of the guests there [had] security clearance and were instructed what to say to foreigners.” Bezmenov himself worked these weddings. He noted that Kennedy “thinks he’s very smart,” but “from the viewpoint of Russian citizens who observed this idiocy,” he was “an idiot,” a “useful idiot,” participating in “propaganda functions like this”—a so-called wedding that was really a “farce,” a “circus performance.”

The Soviets saw Ted Kennedy as someone they could entertain and manipulate. And for the senator from Massachusetts, the Russian romance was ongoing. In March 1983 he reciprocated whatever wedding prize Soviet handlers gave him with a gift of his own: ridicule of Ronald Reagan’s self-described “dream” of missile defense. Around this same time the Massachusetts senator also made an extraordinary private bequest to the Kremlin—and he did so quite consciously.

Kennedy’s Secret Overture to the Kremlin
As we now know from a highly sensitive KGB document, the liberal icon, arguably the most important Democrat in the country at the time, so opposed Ronald Reagan and his policies that the senator approached Soviet dictator Yuri Andropov, proposing to work together to undercut the American president.

This episode was stunning. Had Americans known of Kennedy’s overture to the Soviets at the time, it would have been a scandal. To this day it has not received the attention it demands.

The KGB report is dated May 14, 1983, less than two months after Kennedy first ridiculed SDI. KGB head Viktor Chebrikov sent the memo with “Special Importance,” under the highest classification, directly to General Secretary Andropov. The subject line read: “Regarding Senator Kennedy’s request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party Y. V. Andropov.” It concerned a “confidential” Kennedy offer to Andropov.

According to the KGB memo, Senator Kennedy had conveyed his message to the Soviets through his “close friend and trusted confidant” John Tunney. Chebrikov said that Kennedy was “very troubled” by “the current state of Soviet-American relations,” which the senator attributed not to Andropov and the Kremlin but to “Reagan’s belligerence,” especially his defense policies. “According to Kennedy,” reported Chebrikov, “the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification to his politics.” Reagan’s political success, said the letter, had made the president more dangerous, since it led him to be even surer of his course, and more obstinate—and reelectable.

Chebrikov said that the Democratic senator held out hope that Reagan’s 1984 reelection bid could be thwarted, “which would benefit the Democratic party.” This seemed unlikely, of course, given Reagan’s undeniable political successes and popularity.

Where was the popular president vulnerable? Kennedy provided an answer for his Soviet friends. In Chebrikov’s words, “The only real threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations. These issues, according to the senator [Kennedy], will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.”

At this point in the memo, Chebrikov conveyed the U.S. senator’s precise offer to the USSR’s general secretary: “Kennedy believes that, given the state of current affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan.” Step number one, according to the document, would be for Andropov to invite the good senator to Moscow for a personal meeting. Said Chebrikov: “The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they would be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.”

Kennedy recommended that he bring along Senator Mark Hatfield of Oregon, probably the most liberal Republican in the Senate, and a surefire target for duping. It seems the Democrat felt that the appearance of bipartisanship would “have a strong impact on Americans and political circles in the USA.”

The second step of Kennedy’s plan, the KGB head informed Andropov, was a strategy to help the Soviets “influence Americans.” Chebrikov explained: “Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August–September of this year [1983], televised interviews with Y. V. Andropov in the USA.” The media-savvy Massachusetts senator proposed to the Soviet dictator that he seek a “direct appeal” to the American people. “Kennedy and his friends,” explained Chebrikov, were willing to help, and even named television reporters Walter Cronkite and Barbara Walters as good candidates for sit-down interviews with the dictator.

According to the KGB memo, Senator Kennedy also urged “lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military,” to do interviews with the press in the United States. Kennedy indicated that he could help organize this media blitz, since he wanted Soviet military and government officials to “have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR.”

Apparently, Ted Kennedy viewed Yuri Andropov, that notorious KGB disinformation master who had become arguably the Soviet Union’s dirtiest leader since Stalin, as an honest broker, a potential partner against the supposedly dangerous anti-Communist Ronald Reagan. As Chebrikov noted, “Kennedy is very impressed with the activities of Y. V. Andropov and other Soviet leaders,” admiring “their commitment to heal international affairs” and to “improve mutual understandings between peoples.” Senator Kennedy was approaching the Soviets with this proposal because they could “root out the threat of nuclear war,” “improve Soviet-American relations,” and “define the safety for the world.”

The memo concluded with a discussion of Ted Kennedy’s political prospects, mentioning that the senator “wants to run for president in 1988” but also “does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans.” Chebrikov also reported that Kennedy “underscored that he eagerly awaits a reply to his appeal.”

So according to this confidential memo from the head of the KGB to the leader of the Soviet Union, Senator Ted Kennedy had secretly approached a foreign government—an abusive regime with which the United States had been engaged in a Cold War for nearly forty years—in an effort to “counter” the policies of the president of the United States and to weaken that president’s political standing. This is shocking.

It is not clear what happened after Andropov digested the memo. Sadly, reporters never attempted to fill in the blanks by asking some basic questions of Kennedy. American journalists flatly refused to cover the story in the decades since the Times of London first mentioned the KGB document in February 1992. That remained the case even though Kennedy’s office never denied the legitimacy of the document.

The partisan American press chose not to report on an episode that would embarrass a politician frequently hailed as “the Senate’s last lion.”

Here are some more supporting links.

Frontpage Magazine, May 15, 2008, By Jamie Glazov, Re-published on July 12, 2017,
TED KENNEDY AND THE KGB
A reflection on the late Democratic Senator's outreach to the Kremlin to undermine President Reagan.
Editors’ note: In light of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Trump campaign’s alleged "collusion" with the Russian government during the 2016 US presidential election, which now involves Trump Jr. daring to talk to a Russian woman, Frontpage has deemed it important to bring attention to a forgotten story of verifiable scheming with the Kremlin -- by the late Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy against President Ronald Reagan. We are reprinting below Frontpage editor Jamie Glazov’s 2008 interview with Dr. Paul Kengor, who unearthed documentation detailing Kennedy's outreach to the KGB and Soviet leader Yuri Andropov during the height of the Cold War, in which the Democratic Senator offered to collude with the Soviets to undermine President Reagan.



The Washington Times, Oct 26, 2006,
Kennedy-KGB collaboration



Independent Sentinel, By Bob Bennett - July 12, 2017

When Ted Kennedy Asked the USSR to Help Fix the ’84 Election
Nobody Called It Treason



THE AMERICAN SPECTATOR, By George Parry, April 8, 2018

A Further Perspective - Chappaquiddick Wasn’t the Only Scandal
Here’s one tailor-made for the media’s Russia obsession.



THE AMERICAN SPECTATOR, By PAUL KENGOR, April 12, 2018


Special Report - The Kremlin’s Dupe: Ted Kennedy’s Russia Romance
The full story of his collusion with Moscow needs retelling no less than Chappaquiddick did.



Forbes, By Peter Robinson, Aug 28, 2009,
Ted Kennedy's Soviet Gambit



www.RushLimbaugh.Com, Mar 10, 2015,

John Bolton Is Right ! Obama’s Iran Deal Is an Act of Surrender

…RUSH: Okay. You want to hear what Ted Kennedy wrote? Actually, what he did, he sent his close friend and trusted confidant, a guy named J. Tunney, who was in Moscow, he charged Tunney to convey the following message through confidential contacts to Yuri Andropov. It was in 1983. This was the message to the Soviet leader…

“Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations. Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe. According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics.

“Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year.” This is 1983. “The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.”

Kennedy wanted to coach Andropov on how to deal with Reagan. Kennedy wanted to assist the Soviets in prevailing against United States and Ronald Reagan in nuclear arms talks with Ronald Reagan. So the New York Daily News and these Democrats, they can run around and belly ache and whine and moan all they want about this letter that the Republicans have written the leaders of Iran and call it traitorous, while they conveniently forget all of the multiple occurrences of things worse than this by the Democrat Party. And remember, John Bolton called this Iran deal what it is: surrender. Okay, your telephone calls are coming next when we get back, folks. …



Human Events, By Connie Hair, Thursday Aug 27, 2009
Remembering Teddy’s KGB Connection



The Heritage Foundation, By PAUL KENGOR, OCTOBER 22, 2010,

Dupes: Democrats & the Communist Party - Paul Kengor ( 1:17:04 )
BoogieFinger
Published on Mar 12, 2017


OCTOBER 22, 2010
Dupes Paul Kengor, political science professor at Grove City College, contends that numerous progressives have assisted America’s adversaries.
The author examines connections to the Communist Party and profiles high-ranking government officials that he argues were “duped” by foreign governments,
including Franklin Roosevelt, Jimmy Carter, and Ted Kennedy.
Paul Kengor presented his book at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.

[Yosemitest]

From https://spectator.org/chappaquiddick-wasnt-the-only-scandal/

... So, what was the reaction of the mainstream media when this alarming document was made public ?
According to Paul Kengor, not a single American news organization picked up the London Times story.

Similarly, when Kengor published his book which discussed and reproduced the letter, he
“couldn’t get a single major news source to do a story on it.
CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC.
Not one covered it.”
And “all mainstream sources” turned down his proffered op-eds regarding Chebrikov’s letter.

Think about that.
Here is a classified document found in the Soviet archives from the head of the secret police to the General Secretary
spelling out an outrageous and treasonous political plot by Kennedy
to enlist the Soviet Union’s assistance in his campaign for the presidency.
And not one major media outlet uttered so much as a peep about it.

The discovery of Chebrikov’s letter describing Kennedy’s media advice to Andropov and his efforts to make the Soviet Union a partisan political ally was in and of itself worthy of media coverage.
But, beyond that, consider the subtext and clear inference to be drawn from what Kennedy was reportedly telling the Soviets about Reagan’s major point of political vulnerability, i.e.,
“the problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations.”

Did Kennedy, in effect, actually tell the Soviets to ratchet up the threat of nuclear war as a means of helping him defeat Reagan ?
If so, had he taken into account the fact such increased tensions could take an unexpected turn and inadvertently result in such a war ?
Was he actually willing to risk that in order to win the presidency ?
Or was Kennedy of such limited intelligence that he didn’t comprehend the dangers posed by his secret outreach and suggestions to the Soviets ?

Regardless of the answers, it is astonishing that not one media organization saw fit to ask these questions
or to even report the discovery of this explosive document.
And the fact that it has remained unreported by the mainstream media all of these years
is itself a scandal and quite telling.

The media’s failure to even report or discuss the discovery and contents of Chebrikov’s letter is but one more example of their dishonesty.
The fact that they have ignored this story should tell us all that we need to know about their integrity, fairness, and allegiance to the truth.
How many more examples of their blatant bias and duplicity do we need
before we completely discount all of their reportage as nothing more than progressive agitprop and propaganda ?

As a wise man once said,
if the mainstream media didn’t have double standards,
they would have no standards at all.
For further proof of that statement,
one need only to compare and contrast the media’s fevered, unhinged coverage of the alleged Trump-Russia collusion theory
with the protective cone of silence they have placed over “Teddy, the KGB and the top secret file.”

[Little Ray]

This is simply another example of “it isn’t a crime when a Democrat does it.”
Teddy “The Swimmer” Kennedy should have been hanged for treason. But he died in office.

[rktman]

That’s so last century. Who would want to drag the kennedy name, the lion of the senate, into the mud? Uh, where do I sign up?

[gattaca]

ping

[dfwgator]

And if you are Bill Clinton it's ok to interfere in their elections....

[jjotto]

And buried in Arlington National Cemetery, to America’s shame.

[Baynative]

Thank you for all this work. I saw part of this interview last night and was hoping I could find it today.

[DIRTYSECRET]

Wasting our time. Got away with it. I’ll say it again: On the 50th anniversary of Chappaquidik-this summer-Trump should pardon Sirhan Sirhan.

[Yosemitest]

Trump should be throwing this into the faces of the DemocRATS and the LAME STREAM MEDIA ... every time they confront him about bias, or collusion.

Trump should make them EAT IT !

[Yosemitest]

You wouldn’t believe the hours that I’ve put into this thread.

[Bonemaker]

Kennedy should be dug up and killed again.

[Baynative]

"You wouldn't believe the hours that I've put into this thread"

I certainly do and I hope others appreciate your work also.

I am sending this on to several contacts of mine in the hope that it continues to spread.

[macrahanish #1]

Thanks so much for this! It’s nice to see Kengor getting more exposure.

[Baynative]

"Kennedy should be dug up and killed again."

He should definitely be removed from Arlington where his presence soils the memories of all who served to protect our freedom.

[OftheOhio]

Ted Kennedy came to Wright Patterson in the 2005 timeframe. I wondered why is this POS here. At the time I was supporting a KC-135 SatCom flying testbed that had a very recent digital cockpit upgrade and had some very unique capabilities. He got it sent to the boneyard. Seems a certain Massachusetts Laboratory didn’t like having to interface with Wright Patterson because they wanted their own plane. Most galling, they tried to strip certain unique parts off that bird to be supplied to the lab after the fact.

[CPT Clay]

Long read, bump

[GoldenPup]

Mark Levin: Dr. Paul Kengor; Ted Kennedy Asked USSR to Help Fix the ’84 Election.

No secret that Teddy was a skunk weasel. He was one all his life. Many, many historical examples of his lifelong corruption.

[KittyKares]

I couldn’t stay up to watch Levin’s entire interview and am grateful for your post. This is stunning material. Trump is being accused of doing what the Democrats have been doing all along.

Regarding Teddy, I appreciate this line:

“Another greatest example of monumental idiocy [among] American politicians...”

Not much has changed except that it seems to have gotten worse thanks to our progressive educational institutions.

[GOPJ]

Democrats get away with corruption because the press had their lips surgically sewn to Democrat’s butts...

[GOPJ]

It’s NOT stupid for democrats to be corrupt - BECAUSE the press allows them to get away with it... then add in the corrupt FBI thugs and it’s amazing any Republican has been elected.,