Posted on 12/25/2018 8:32:42 PM PST by vannrox
Andrew Sullivan.
Good one, comrade.
Trump is very unusual as far as recent presidents go. He hasn’t opened up a front in a new country yet. Bush, Bill Clinton, Bush, and Obama all inserted US troops in to countries. Hillary, of course, took great pride in overthrowing Libya.
Trump is no war-monger. And he’s clearly trying to wind down the US presence in countries that those other presidents invaded.
You would almost think the US media would sit up and offer a bit of praise. But, of course, they hate him too much to notice that he’s doing what they’ve always insisted they wanted done.
WMD. The congress was hoodwinked. We should have bombed the entire infrastructure of Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran too. Bridges, power plants. Keep the water clean-no disease. Air strikes minimum personnel. Threaten to come back and do it again. Instead we nation build with every contractor having his hands in it. $45 million for a gas station? It wasn’t just congress. WE were hoodwinked. I’m angry the left wasn’t vocal enough.
...or an open border, or ‘free’ trade with fascist governments...
The Establishment is literally allied with al Qaeda in Syria. Armed them & protected them from Syria & Russia.
Tell me why they have not been arrested for this, plus what they did in Libya (use of Jihadists to overthrow govt & destroy nation).
Limbaugh talks about the hate for Trump a lot. A lot of times I found myself wondering why all the hate. I may be late to the party but I believe it is just blind hate for the person that knocked Hillarys azz out of the WH. It didnt get them when Obuma won because he was a lefty, being black was a bonus. Trump beating the broom rider is all they need. The fact that hes outspoken and rich is a bonus. They would have hated Cruz as much and the never-Cruzers would too, which are the same people as the never-Trumpers. The lefty didnt win, thats all they really need. Which means they hate all of us who support DJT. IMO So screwem, Ill just hate them back.
Sounds right to me...
Declare Victory,,,
then Pull Out.
It’s what we do.
Damn, is he long-winded. If he would stay on topic instead of constantly heading out into the weeds to pleasure himself with his oh-so-righteous Trump loathing, he would be a lot more readable.
If arming the Ukraine so they can defend themselves from Russia, defeating ISIS to the point there's no point in staying in Syria, getting China to help cut off North Korea to pressure them to give up nuclear weapons, then threatening trade wars with them to get them to think about negotiating on trade, and telling our allies to fight for and pay for their own wars, is a chaotic, incoherent, dangerous mess, I'll take that over the alternative.
I disagree with the headline. The establishment doesn’t want anything to change markets, because they could lose. Wealthy people are also tapped more than others for tax revenues to fund wars. Several billionaires have stated after their wishful thinking that there will be no more wars. They would rather sterilize us and starve us to death to reduce population under a world government. Wars only get in the way of their plans for slavery.
lol. andrew sullivan. someone was desperate for a friend tonight.
Ain't that da fact jack. As long as someone else or someone else's son (or daughter) goes off to fight, die, and or come back wounded (physically and/or mentally) we will never be rid of these war's that we never prosecute with the intent of actually winning/totally destroying the enemy.
And closet commie Sullivan likes that word, “neoconservative.” He’s not alone, but he is in a rather noisy minority. In some European and American circles, the word is no more than another cowardly way to imply more libels against conservative Jewish people.
Louis Farrakhan Rips ‘Wicked Jews’ in Hollywood
Newsmax ^ | March 21, 2006 | Newsmax
Posted on 03/21/2006 4:03:32 PM PST by george76
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1600606/posts
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/21/95331.shtml?s=ic
“It’s been nearly a month since Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakahan blamed “Zionists and neo-cons” for “manipulating” President Bush into invading Iraq - before blasting “wicked Jews” in Hollywood for promoting ‘lesbianism [and] homosexuality.’”
It’s a word loved by neo-Nazis and other lefties so mad, that they oppose defense of the U.S.A. against foreign tyrants that are threatening to wipe us out while building nuclear weapons forces and a new axis to do so.
War: Pat Buchanan vs. Neo Cons
newsmax ^ | July 22, 2006 4:42 p.m. EDT | NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 07/23/2006 12:26:23 PM PDT by do the dhue
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1670919/posts
http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/7/22/165634.shtml?s=ic
“Here on the homefront, sydicated columnist Pat Buchanan has launched a broadside against what he says are “neo cons” — America conservatives who support Israel and are really pushing for a wider war between the United States and Iran.”
Here’s an example of what eventually happens to the projecting lib-Nazis.
FR = Neocon, Zio (Jew) website (Mod sez, brace for impact! Brace for impact! ZOT!)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3543951/posts
I missed that one the first time through. Thanks.
You missed the memo. Sliming any critics as “anti-semites” ended a decade & about a million needless deaths ago. Now, you are supposed to call us”Russian bots”. Just as absurd. But, you’ll get away with it, comrade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.