Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: SCOTUS Halts Contempt Order For Mysterious Foreign Company Subpoenaed By Mueller Team
Townhall ^ | 12/23/2018 | Beth Baumann

Posted on 12/23/2018 7:17:38 PM PST by digger48

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Trumpisourlastchance

I am thinking the same thing.

But we need more info.

In the near future, we will see how Mr Whitaker handles it.


41 posted on 12/23/2018 8:40:01 PM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Yes, that’s me in #3. For referencing a particular letter of the alphabet.


42 posted on 12/23/2018 8:40:39 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Trust the 17th letter of the English alphabet!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Did I miss the breakdown of the decision.

How did the Court rule?


43 posted on 12/23/2018 8:44:50 PM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

This is ‘what they don’t want you to know about’.


44 posted on 12/23/2018 8:46:42 PM PST by lee martell (AT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

You know that I’m referring to the FISA abuses that have gone unpunished. Who watches the watchmen?


45 posted on 12/23/2018 8:54:35 PM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

For what?


46 posted on 12/23/2018 8:56:25 PM PST by inchworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Maris Crane

The stay is linked on Vladecks twitter feed

Signed only by Roberts

Seems all this does is stay the contempt ruling until the DOJ responds to the Court by Dec. 31.

Sounds like Roberts could also reimpose the contempt after that point, depending on the response


47 posted on 12/23/2018 9:06:39 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Is making a ruling on a Sunday unusual? I would certainly think so.


48 posted on 12/23/2018 9:08:26 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

Whose side is the whole damn govt on?


49 posted on 12/23/2018 9:09:31 PM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Maris Crane

Mueller will never get Trump.

Mueller could indict and arrest Trump.

The Congress could impeach Trump.

Mueller could waterboard Trump 24/7 at Guantanamo for three months before 2020 election.

On January 2021 Donald Trump will be sworn in for his 2nd term.


50 posted on 12/23/2018 9:13:51 PM PST by unclebankster (globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

If it’s not the first case so sealed, could it be that BHO’s pardons of Hillary and Bill Clinton would have been accomplished earlier?


51 posted on 12/23/2018 9:14:15 PM PST by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


52 posted on 12/23/2018 9:19:36 PM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter
2, it ruled in favor of a foreign company and against American prosecutors (even if they are Mueller’s team).

Possibly Huawei CFO Wanzhou Meng who is suspected of conspiracy to defraud multiple financial US institutions?

FReegards!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic

53 posted on 12/23/2018 9:29:32 PM PST by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: digger48
so why weren't deep staters who failed to comply with Congressional subpoenas fined $5000 a week/
54 posted on 12/23/2018 9:35:31 PM PST by rolling_stone (Hang em slowly don't boil the rope make it a little short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Yes. Roberts is a controlled asset of the deep state. The truth will come out when the FISA declassified happens and the corruption of the FISA court judges are exposed. Roberts is involved.


55 posted on 12/23/2018 9:57:40 PM PST by upsdriver (retired from ups since 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

Possibly Huawei CFO Wanzhou Meng who is suspected of conspiracy to defraud multiple financial US institutions?
***************************************
Wouldn’t be in Mueller’s jurisdiction unless it has been hugely expanded.


56 posted on 12/23/2018 10:05:16 PM PST by House Atreides (My Number)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Trump_the_Evil_Left

Chase claimed insanity and beat the conviction. His was an interesting story and the acquittal was just the end of a long chain of attacks and ploys made by his political adversaries.


57 posted on 12/23/2018 10:31:26 PM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

#12. It’s all a mystery to me. I’m getting dizzy just trying to follow the players.


58 posted on 12/23/2018 10:58:03 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Supreme Court justices are not chosen because they are left or right, but because they are pro-donor, i.e. the businesses that lobby “our” representatives in Congress.


59 posted on 12/23/2018 11:13:08 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Here’s my take on this ... when _____, the _____ of the country where the ______ Corporation is based, found out about the injunction, ___ called a high ranking official in the ____ of ______ and threatened to _______ the _____ if the ______ wasn’t ______.

You heard this from me before it hits the open web.


60 posted on 12/23/2018 11:34:22 PM PST by Peter ODonnell (I taught AOC everything she knows, and it only took five minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson