Posted on 12/16/2018 6:28:52 AM PST by libstripper
... The more the lying MSM tells me he was a womanizer, the more convinced I’ll be that he wasn’t.
**********
A single instance, maybe done in a weak moment when he felt down and out, wouldn’t make him a womanizer. Any evidence that there were others after Stormy?
“Any evidence that there were others after Stormy?”
There’s not even any evidence that there was Stormy.
All there is, is a) her allegations, b) the fact that he paid her off, c) some group pictures that they are both in, and d) the widespread prejudice that all married men will screw anything if they think they can get away with it.
In other words, no evidence at all.
From what I’ve seen of Trump, he doesn’t fit the profile. He’s never smoked, drank or used drugs - and I hear he’s a bit of a germaphobe.
Moreover, he strikes me as a very disciplined, calculating person - any appearance of impulsiveness or recklessness is far more likely to be an act to make himself unpredictable, and to put his adversaries off guard.
The women in his family - even including his ex-wives - do not seem to regard him as a sleaze at all or behave vindictively. They may have differences of opinion with him, but I just don’t get the kind of “vibes” that would suggest they are conspiring to hide a dirty side of Trump.
But most of all, whatever way the MSM portrays Trump is bound to be the the exact opposite of the truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.