Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Chief Justice Takes On the President
Townhall.com ^ | November 29, 2018 | Judge Andrew Napolitano

Posted on 11/29/2018 3:37:26 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 11/29/2018 3:37:26 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

His kids were adopted from Ireland via somewhere in Latin America.

It’s ILLEGAL for people not residing in Ireland to adopt kids from there, see..? That’s why they did it that way, the technically illegal way. That’s why they had the two Irish mothers FLY out of Ireland, to use the Little Kid Black Market.

Roberts and his wife were vulnerable on that, that’s why they say he switched his Obamacare vote.

He was blackmailed.


2 posted on 11/29/2018 3:43:12 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Who is correct?

Trump. These anti-Constitutional "judges" need to be removed.

3 posted on 11/29/2018 3:46:23 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I would say that he is still being blackmailed.


4 posted on 11/29/2018 3:46:48 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

IIRC, this all started when a judge in Hawaii ruled against Trump for trying to enforce the exact same immigration law Obama used — separating parents and children when the parents were detained.

That ruling finally got to the SC which sided with Trump against the Hawaii judge.


5 posted on 11/29/2018 3:47:41 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Take the deal, Roberts. This is not the hill you want to kill yourself trying to defend. Instead of spitting in Trump's eye, ask him to extend you a graceful exit. He'll help you get out of the pickle you are in, if only you are willing. Otherwise, well, bye.


6 posted on 11/29/2018 3:47:56 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Chief Justice Roberts never said a word when the OBAMSTER criticized the Supreme Court rulings because he is a coward who was and still is afraid of being called a racist.

Jumping on the opportunity of criticizing Trump had no risk and will get him much praise from the media.

All this guy cares about is appearances and his legacy or he would have stayed silent like he did with the previous POTUS.

7 posted on 11/29/2018 3:50:52 PM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real

What deal are you talking about?


8 posted on 11/29/2018 3:51:31 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The author overlooks the fact that the POTUS can deny entry of any group of persons he sees fit, the SCOTUS has already confirmed that. Trump is just exercising that power by designating central and south Americans who come across the boarder illegally as a group. And when you have tens of thousands of them crossing at once and overwhelming the system, it must be brought under control. The law was never intended to allow us to be invaded and not defend ourselves.


9 posted on 11/29/2018 3:51:43 PM PST by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

.
As usual, Town Hall blows it!


10 posted on 11/29/2018 3:51:55 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Judge Nap has a few inaccuracies. For one, Sec Def did NOT call it a stunt. Mattis specifically replied to a Reporters question asking if it was a stunt, by stating that WE DON’T DO STUNTS.

In addition, under the UN/Int’l rules the asylum seekers are supposed to ask for asylum in the first country that they enter - that would be Mexico, not USA. Some Freeper did a lot of research and posted this a few days ago.

Also, not mentioned is the fact that we are still operating in a state of emergency since 9/11 and a couple of other national emergencies which involve illicit border crossings, hence I’ll be surprised if POTUS doesn’t have the right to do this-since rules change to give POTUS more authority in emergencies, and he already has plenty in regards to who gets in and who doesn’t.

Roberts needs to shut up. If there weren’t Obama Judges and Trump/Conservative judges, we wouldn’t have had to endure high tech lynching of Thomas and Kavanaugh.


11 posted on 11/29/2018 3:52:24 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Gay Judge speaketh. But...

Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states plainly: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

ection 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act similarly states: “Unless otherwise ordered by the President, it shall be unlawful for any alien to depart from or enter or attempt to depart from or enter the United States except under such reasonable rules, regulations, and orders, and subject to such limitations and exceptions as the President may prescribe.”

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-upholding-rule-law-ensuring-consequences-illegally-cross-border/

“any aliens or of any class of aliens...impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”


12 posted on 11/29/2018 3:53:33 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Words ae just inadequate.


13 posted on 11/29/2018 3:53:52 PM PST by Pride in the USA (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
IIRC, this all started when a judge in Hawaii ruled against Trump for trying to enforce the exact same immigration law Obama used — separating parents and children when the parents were detained.

That ruling finally got to the SC which sided with Trump against the Hawaii judge.

That right. Needs to be repeated .

14 posted on 11/29/2018 3:54:51 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Judge” nap doesn’t quote any statutes when he says the radical leftist judge upheld US law. I’ve heard plenty of lawyers on TV quote the statutes that Trump was enforcing, and the recent SCOTUS ruling in support of that enforcement.

Also, there is the basic premise that someone seeking asylum must stop in the country (Mexico) where it is first offered.

Everyone knows this commie judge will be overturned on appeal.

I used to like judge nap sometime ago but now he’s nothing but a Trump hating butt head. Replace him with Judge Jeanine.


15 posted on 11/29/2018 3:56:37 PM PST by Ceebass (The only thing Orwell got wrong was the date)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

Judge Nappy is ALWAYS wrong. Just like most of the other tards at FOX he was given the orders to march left, hard left.

I remember seeing him when he very confidently determined that President Trump could not appoint Whitaker as a temp AG. Of course he was wrong on that one, too, but it doesn’t matter.
People see him say that stuff and they are convinced President Trump is wrong.


16 posted on 11/29/2018 3:58:59 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

good post!


17 posted on 11/29/2018 3:59:34 PM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

I just watch Fox Business. Maria B. S. Varney but mostly Lou Dobbs.


18 posted on 11/29/2018 4:03:28 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Trial judges do not make public policy. They apply statutes as written by Congress, pursuant to precedent as set forth by the Supreme Court and the intermediate appellate court to which they are subject.

That's the theory and the job description.

But in actuality, many do overstep their charter and make, or attempt to make, public policy by stretching or reinterpreting the written word of laws and the US Constitution.

Prime example:

The judges that decided that President Trump does not have the authority to end Barack Obama's illegal DACA act.

19 posted on 11/29/2018 4:04:18 PM PST by Iron Munro (Some things are so stupid and idiotic only a liberal could believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think we should let all those refugees with TB, lice, respiratory infections go to the Judges chambers to stay until their cases can be heard. He didn’t have any problems with them exposing Americans to those diseases so he should be fine with it.


20 posted on 11/29/2018 4:04:41 PM PST by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson