Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Parties Can No Longer Harness Their Bases
Townhall.com ^ | November 7, 2018 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 11/07/2018 10:15:13 AM PST by Kaslin

It is perhaps the central irony of our politics today: We live in an incredibly polarized and partisan moment, but our political parties have never been weaker.

As odd as it sounds, political parties in democracies have an important anti-democratic function. Traditionally, the parties shaped the choices put to voters. Long before voters decided anything in the primary or general elections, party bosses worked to groom good candidates, weed out bad ones, organize interests and frame issues.

In the modern era, the story of party decline usually begins in the aftermath of the 1968 presidential election. The move toward primaries and the democratic selection of delegates took power away from the bosses.

After Watergate, there were more reforms, curbing the ability of the parties to raise and spend money freely. This led to the rise of political action committees, which raise cash independent of the formal party structure. As Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said during the floor debate over the McCain-Feingold campaign finance bill in 2001, "We haven't taken a penny of money out of politics. We've only taken the parties out of politics."

Outside groups -- the National Rifle Association, Planned Parenthood, unions, etc. -- often do more to effectively organize voters around single issues or personalities than the parties do. The Kochs, Tom Steyer, George Soros and Sheldon Adelson serve as party bosses, only outside the parties.

Technology is another, less obvious force siphoning power from the parties. For instance, as political historian Michael Barone has noted, the telephone dealt a grievous blow to political conventions, where insiders have outsize power.

"Until the 1960s, the national convention was a communications medium," Barone writes. "Political leaders in the various states seldom met each other, outside of sessions of Congress, during the four years between presidential elections."

The telephone eliminated the need for the face-to-face negotiations. Today, political conventions are little more than infomercials for presidential candidates.

The internet and cable TV have accelerated the eclipsing of parties. Opinion websites and TV and radio hosts now do more to shape issues and select candidates than the parties do. It's a bit like comic books. Readership of comics has been in steady decline, but movie studios and toy manufacturers still feed off the brands created generations ago.

The weird thing is that the American people didn't seem to notice. The largest voting bloc in America today call themselves independents, but most of them tend to be as partisan as everybody else, while "pure independents" are less likely to vote at all.

And yet, Americans keep talking about partisan politics as if the parties are in charge, and base voters on the left and the right keep railing against the party establishments like mobs unaware that they're kicking dead horses.

Among the many problems with the rotting out of the parties is that the rot spreads. The parties are supposed to be where politics happens. McConnell's point about money in politics is analogous to the larger trend. When you take political power out of the parties, other actors seize it.

When wielded by people who aren't supposed to be in the politics business, that power corrupts. This is why every Academy Awards ceremony is peppered with asinine political jeremiads, and why late-night comedy hosts serve as de facto Democratic Party organizers.

It's why people like Jerry Falwell Jr., the president of Liberty University, act like social-gospel ward heelers. It's why the cable news networks spend so much of their time rallying voters in one direction or another. And it's why countless pundits and allegedly objective reporters serve as unofficial political consultants.

It's also why Donald Trump could leverage his celebrity to seize the GOP nomination, and why someone like Oprah Winfrey could be next.

There are other, larger forces at work. The decline of strong independent institutions -- religious, civic and familial -- has people searching for other outlets to find a sense of meaning and belonging. Identity politics, populism and nationalism are filling that void.

That's happened before, but when it did, the parties were there to filter, constrain and channel those passions in a healthy direction. The Potemkin parties can't, or won't, do that anymore. The result is a nation of partisans decrying partisanship.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2018midterms; tds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2018 10:15:13 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Never Trumper at his best.


2 posted on 11/07/2018 10:22:00 AM PST by SaraJohnson ( Whites must sue for racism. It's pay day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Political parties “weed out bad candidates”? Both major, U.S. political parties have failed to “weed out bad candidates”, and this is continuing, today! Far Leftist candidates with domestic violence records and RINO Republicans are two examples of bad candidates who aren’t “weeded out”!


3 posted on 11/07/2018 10:22:13 AM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good one Katlyn. As The Bible States the next stage is global 1 world socialism I find it interesting how this article plays into that issue. Just how will the strength of the American people, their faith, be weakened so much that it can be overcome by utopian ideals that have never worked in the past.

Certainly we do live in interesting times!


4 posted on 11/07/2018 10:25:46 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

Correct. ALL the neverTrumpers in the House lost.

Heller was lukewarm at best. Vukmir and Walker didn’t want Trump around.

Two of the few Trump supporters who lost was Jason Lewis and Matt Rosendale. I still don’t get MT. This should be solid red.

Lewis was in a bluish district. MN looked as though it was moving toward Trump but fizzled.


5 posted on 11/07/2018 10:26:22 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is very insightful - thanks for posting this, Kaslin.

I hadn’t thought about the eclipsing of political parties leading to the division we have today. It’s obvious the phone, computers, teleconferencing, the Internet, 24/7 cable TV and internet political sites and chat have had a big influence, but I hadn’t thought about those media replacing political parties. Goldberg does a good job explaining why insane libs, in the absence of moderating forces of traditional parties and conventions, have taken over everything in modern life and infused it with politics. Explains why you cannot watch a sporting event, a concert, an awards show, go to a restaurant, etc without getting slapped in the face (or worse) with politics.

In short, it explains why modern life has been thoroughly ruined by politics and the ends of moderating parties and party bosses.

The big question is “Where does it go from here?” Are there ANY possible moderating forces on the horizon that can control this typhoon?


6 posted on 11/07/2018 10:28:17 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Never Trumpster pundits like this clown are no longer needed to tell us how to vote and why!


7 posted on 11/07/2018 10:28:41 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Hillary has a better chance of winning in 2020 than 1 of those “bombs” going off! ~ Normsrevenge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wow JoNah’s inner fascist coming to the fore today. How dare the people govern their own destiny! Their “betters” in the poltical party should be managing them better!


8 posted on 11/07/2018 10:29:05 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

The in mass retiring of a whole slew of rhino republicans I believe was a deep swamp sabotage in a mid term election. However in the long run it ended up weeding out rhinos from the Republican party. The strengthening of the party just took place.

I suspect the next stage of trump negotiations over the fate of America just switched to hardball.


9 posted on 11/07/2018 10:29:13 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Explains why you cannot watch a sporting event, a concert, an awards show, go to a restaurant, etc without getting slapped in the face (or worse) with politics.

Andrew Breitbart was spot on when he remarked that politics is downstream of culture.
10 posted on 11/07/2018 10:30:24 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LS

Would you please post a list of the House Never Trumpsters, who were voted out of office?

Thanks
Dave


11 posted on 11/07/2018 10:30:51 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Hillary has a better chance of winning in 2020 than 1 of those “bombs” going off! ~ Normsrevenge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Was this satire?

Maybe he wants us to have a red chip or blue chip implanted in their head so we can take orders from headquarters. `


12 posted on 11/07/2018 10:32:25 AM PST by grumpygresh (Abolish administrative law. It's regressive, medieval and unconstitutional!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

“How dare the people govern their own destiny! Their “betters” in the political party should be managing them better!”

Amen Bro!

Jonah and his DC peers are starting realize that we don’t need nor want them anymore!


13 posted on 11/07/2018 10:34:26 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Hillary has a better chance of winning in 2020 than 1 of those “bombs” going off! ~ Normsrevenge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Republicans only lost because of the massive censorship campaign against them.


14 posted on 11/07/2018 10:38:15 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Jonah is saying the horse started to leave the barn when the telephone was invented and party bosses could begin plotting long before the conventions. The eclipse of parties and strong political bosses accelerated with the telephone, television and internet. We’ve all instinctively known this, but he lays out a cogent analysis of what happened.

Say what you will about political bosses selecting the candidates, it did weed out the flakes and crazy and led to better, more sober statesmen getting nominated at all levels. We didn’t have insane socialists and communists making inroads into our politics. We didn’t have such inflamed passions where you can’t even dine in a restaurant or watch an awards show or football game without the crazies accosting or assaulting you.

That genie isn’t going back into the bottle, either. Unless there is somebody strong enough to put a leash on the crazies, we now have the “new norm” in front of us and it isn’t pretty. It may well lead to civil war and the complete failure of the Republic.

I honestly never would have expected modern communications technologies to have led to that. We all thought they would lead to more civic engagement and more sober discussion of policies, not to unhinged crazy hordes and mobs organizing themselves.


15 posted on 11/07/2018 10:41:29 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Andrew Breitbart was spot on when he remarked that politics is downstream of culture.

Yes and no. They feed off each other. Once SCOTUS ruled for fake marriage in Obergefell vs. Hodges, the floodgates opened, same thing with abortion and ROe v. Wade. The anti-culture warriors needed the political hat rack of a SCOTUS decision to freeze things in their position, and to win over those who didn't have a moral commitment, but wanted to be generally law abiding.
16 posted on 11/07/2018 10:42:03 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yeah, well, Jonah, the parties SUCK, so it’s no great loss.


17 posted on 11/07/2018 11:03:26 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Baloney.

The purpose of the Democrat Party is to elect thieves to public office so that they have access to the public treasuries in order to loot them.

Their base is thieves.

“I vote Democrat because they will steal for me. I know they keep some of the stolen money for themselves, but I’ll get some.”


18 posted on 11/07/2018 11:04:42 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson
He's right about one thing.

I've said for more than two years now that political party affiliation means less today than it has at any time in my life. I've voted pretty consistently for Republicans, but I am not registered with any party and I have no faith in the GOP leadership. I run into more and more people here on FR who say the same thing.

19 posted on 11/07/2018 11:13:28 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

The other thing that amuses about JG here. In his world Hillary Clinton was the perfect candidate. A corrupt career politician carefully pushed through the nomination process by party possess who carefully protected her from the “crazy” candidates.


20 posted on 11/07/2018 11:31:09 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson