Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM to acquire software company Red Hat for $34 billion
Reuters ^

Posted on 10/28/2018 4:02:03 PM PDT by Java4Jay

IBM Corp said on Sunday it had agreed to acquire U.S. software company Red Hat Inc for $34 billion, including debt, as it seeks to diversify its technology hardware and consulting business into higher-margin products and services.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: defunctbusinesses; ibm; redhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
Founded in 1993, Red Hat specializes in Linux operating systems, the most popular type of open-source software, which was developed as an alternative to proprietary software made by Microsoft Corp.
1 posted on 10/28/2018 4:02:03 PM PDT by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

IBM bought Red Hat for its Linux corporate server software, the best in the world.


2 posted on 10/28/2018 4:03:39 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

I am a member of the IBM team who is trying to get IBM back into the computing game.
I hope its not too late.


3 posted on 10/28/2018 4:07:50 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

Very smart.


4 posted on 10/28/2018 4:08:13 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

Sounds like a lot to pay for a company that sells free software.


5 posted on 10/28/2018 4:08:38 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Just don’t take what you want and throw the rest to the Chinese


6 posted on 10/28/2018 4:08:58 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

Does Red Hat do a lot of cloud computing?


7 posted on 10/28/2018 4:09:38 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Can you do something to make Lotus Notes friendly, intuitive, and less bloated?

It’s some horrible software.

I’m just ranting. Any chance to bash Lotus Notes is never passed up.


8 posted on 10/28/2018 4:11:20 PM PDT by wally_bert (I will competently make sure the thing is done incompetently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

The only reason anyone still uses Notes is because getting off of it is so painful.


9 posted on 10/28/2018 4:15:34 PM PDT by bigtoona (Make America Great Again! America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Red Hat is a #metoo cloud player. Their real strength is locking down the OS and applying security patches even though that means delaying the latest features. Government uses a lot of Red Hat mainly for that reason. I don’t think this will be bad for IBM but it seems a little pricey, way too high a multiple of revenue.


10 posted on 10/28/2018 4:16:12 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Anybody can download and install it. It takes a lot of knowledge to support it. Support is where the money is.


11 posted on 10/28/2018 4:21:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

That’s a chunk-a-change.


12 posted on 10/28/2018 4:23:52 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigtoona

Some of my eastern European colleagues actually love Notes and are ones insisting on it stay in use.

Maybe it comes from those decades of communist oppression. Notes is an oppressive environment.


13 posted on 10/28/2018 4:24:11 PM PDT by wally_bert (I will competently make sure the thing is done incompetently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Red Hat is proprietary and they charge up for their Linux software. It isn’t free - which is why businesses run it and get Red Hat support to maintain it.


14 posted on 10/28/2018 4:24:22 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Sounds like a lot to pay for a company that sells free software.

They do a little more than that.

"Red Hat's strategic planning isn't like yours, but with 64 straight quarters of revenue growth and continuing on course to become the first billion-dollar-a-quarter open-source company, the Linux and cloud power is clearly on to something."

https://www.zdnet.com/article/red-hats-only-business-plan-is-to-keep-changing-plans/

15 posted on 10/28/2018 4:24:23 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

It was developed an an alternative to Unix.


16 posted on 10/28/2018 4:25:10 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

Bad idea. I expect IBM to drop 10% on this horrible desperate deal. $34B for a company doing $3B. IBM only has $14.5B of cash including marketable securities. It will borrow most of it, already has $47B in debt.


17 posted on 10/28/2018 4:25:13 PM PDT by hotdogjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

One thing I miss about Lotus Notes from 25 years ago - the ability to pull back an errant email. Don’t know if that’s still possible.

Would have saved 1 boss back then from an accidental “reply-all”. Oops for him.


18 posted on 10/28/2018 4:26:51 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Sounds like a lot to pay for a company that sells free software.


That was my first thought. Apparently Red Hat has $3B in annual revenue. Unless they have phenomenal growth, it will take an awfully long time for this acquisition to pay off. To say nothing of the debt IBM will have to incur to make it happen.

Not as bad as AT&T’s mindless purchase of DirectTV for $48B, but close.


19 posted on 10/28/2018 4:27:21 PM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It takes a lot of knowledge to support it.

You could hire away a bunch of folks for $34 billion.

And the way these tech takeovers usually work, a bunch of the guys at the takeover target are going to be gone within 18 months. Sure, some of them can have their knowledge extracted before they flee or are discarded, but 6 figure signing bonuses could probably reach the same result a lot cheaper.

20 posted on 10/28/2018 4:27:57 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson