Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If women should not serve in combat, it seems to me that they should not serve as commander-in-chief of those who must fight and die in combat. Such thinking strikes at the heart of today's conventional wisdom, but I am afraid one day we'll have to learn the hard way.
1 posted on 10/19/2018 5:20:53 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Colonel Kangaroo

I’ve never served in,or near,combat so it could be argued that my position lacks credibility.However,I believe that the only military women who should be allowed anywhere near combat are physicians,surgeons and nurses.


2 posted on 10/19/2018 5:23:27 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (I've Never Owned Slaves...You've Never Picked Cotton.End Of "Discussion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

If the United States and other major powers did not employ women in combat in World War I or II, why would they need women in combat now? Caring about women means not putting them in harm’s way unnecessarily.


3 posted on 10/19/2018 5:24:21 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

But I don’t understand. Every movie or TV show I see lately shows women in combat kicking the a$$es of all the men. How could this not be reality?


4 posted on 10/19/2018 5:28:01 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Martis speaks gobbledygook and has to go.


5 posted on 10/19/2018 5:31:27 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
I enlisted during Nam.

NO, women do NOT belong in combat.

The ONLY people advocating otherwise are attempting to undermine the military to further a social agenda.

9 posted on 10/19/2018 5:42:33 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

One thing to bear in mind — a lot of lusty men want to bunk with beautiful babes. Better yet — shower with them. Their opinions need to be taken with a grain of salt.

At the very least — physical standards should not be watered down for front line forces. Some forces could be light on front line activity and more specialized. They need not have such high standards.

But frankly there will be an increasing need for desk jockeys who view monitors. The need to analyze intel is becoming a bottomless pit in modern warfare.


11 posted on 10/19/2018 5:47:58 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (News and poltiicians who ignore James O'Keefe are fake and evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

In DC, a “gaffe” is when someone actually tells the truth.


14 posted on 10/19/2018 5:49:31 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

They might want to consider Rush Limbaugh’s proposal for the creation of the “All American Amazon Army.”


16 posted on 10/19/2018 5:53:30 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

The dirty little secret is that the military is pushing women and homosexuals into these roles because they can’t find enough straight men to do the job.


18 posted on 10/19/2018 5:56:35 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
Women are already serving in combat, on the ground, in the air, and at sea. I disapprove. But it is already in place.

Women are being maimed in combat. There are even books and magazine articles glorifying it---photos of less-than-modestly-clad female Iraq/Afghanistan veterans showing off their prosthetic devices. They've been in the Humvees, in combat uniform, carrying combat weapons and gear, firing those weapons at the enemy---they've been serving in combat. I don't know how many have died in combat.

It's not wrong for a woman to take up arms when enemy troops are marching down her street in her own country. She looks out the window, yes, the kitchen window, okay. She sees the enemy, she grabs a rifle. But to recruit them for combat and send them abroad? No.

When Congress changes the actual laws that are BEING BROKEN NOW that prevent women from serving in combat, then women will also be subject directly to any potential draft. Women will be required to register for selective service, and report for combat when their numbers are called.

IT'S COMING. I OPPOSE IT.

24 posted on 10/19/2018 5:59:59 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

That’s ignorant. I’ll mention Golda Meir and Margret Thatcher as counterpoint

Women should not be on the front lines in combat. No argument. Pilots, nurses, support personnel good to go


34 posted on 10/19/2018 6:06:01 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Weak Link: The Feminization of the American Military
44 posted on 10/19/2018 6:12:27 AM PDT by mykroar (Congratulations President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

I think we should first address women on deployment. I hear too many stories of women becoming pregnant just before a scheduled deployment, on deployment and having to thus be taken off, being excused from deployment due to child-care issues, etc, etc.

For men, if you miss deployment due to deliberately making yourself unfit for duty, you have a problem. It should be the same with women: you miss deployment, you’re out, here’s your discharge papers, no benefits.

And have frequent surprise deployments to weed out the deadwood.


48 posted on 10/19/2018 6:20:50 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

If you are in a depoyable MOS, you need to shoulder your share of combat duty.

Do not pull some crap head stunt and claim your malingering is actually freeing someone else to fight.


49 posted on 10/19/2018 6:21:06 AM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

I have always had mixed concerns about Gen. Mattis. I do not like how he turned his back on his Marines in Haditha,Iraq.


50 posted on 10/19/2018 6:25:34 AM PDT by MGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

The Red Chinese want US women in combat roles...and thinks that’s a grand idea.


58 posted on 10/19/2018 6:42:43 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

The mighty men of Babylon have forborn to fight, they have remained in their holds: their might hath failed; they became as women...

Jeremiah 51:30


59 posted on 10/19/2018 6:48:08 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Our current President has never served in the military. He’s doing a pretty good job and so would the right woman who never saw combat. The criteria for eligibility to be President is 35 years of age and a NBC. It’s says nothing about gender or military experience.


63 posted on 10/19/2018 7:04:59 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight yourr way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

I humped a full load Ruck Sack in the Infantry in Nam. We had thirty something NCO’s that were breaking down from the effort, no way a woman with much less upper body strength would have been effective. Combat Infantry is not for sissies.


73 posted on 10/19/2018 11:58:46 AM PDT by Ace the Biker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Imho, women don’t belong in combat arms.

Having said that, numbers matter. For example, attrition. Losses in MOS. There are other examples where a country (sovereign state etc), might not exist if women were not in combat arms.

So, keep women from direct combat if possible.

5.56mm


75 posted on 10/19/2018 12:06:45 PM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson