Skip to comments.
Schiff: There is legal precedent for impeaching sitting officials over prior criminal conduct
The Hill ^
| 10/03/18
| OLIVIA BEAVERS
Posted on 10/03/2018 11:47:25 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: yesthatjallen
What criminal conduct would that be, Mr. Schitt?
2
posted on
10/03/2018 11:48:18 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Science is a method, not a belief system.)
To: yesthatjallen
Trump wasn’t a public official before 2017! What an idiot.
3
posted on
10/03/2018 11:49:03 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: yesthatjallen
If ‘legal precedents’ were so casually overlooked and outright ignored for the Clintons and “O”, why would they matter NOW?
4
posted on
10/03/2018 11:49:09 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
("Nearly all men can stand adversity...to test a man's character, give him power." A. Lincoln)
To: yesthatjallen
Man! What a Schiff-head.
The man gives boobs a bad name.
5
posted on
10/03/2018 11:49:20 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
To: yesthatjallen
They really do want to push toward civil war.
6
posted on
10/03/2018 11:49:21 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: yesthatjallen
I assume if dems are floating this it means they know they lost on Kavanaugh and need a way to motivate their base.
7
posted on
10/03/2018 11:49:27 AM PDT
by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I’d like to think it could be Uranium deals?
To: yesthatjallen
Demoncrats are Rabid Rats
9
posted on
10/03/2018 11:49:35 AM PDT
by
DivineMomentsOfTruth
("There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." -GW)
To: yesthatjallen
And they say Kavanaugh used to get Schiff-faced in college.
Look at the HOUSE today and this yurk.
10
posted on
10/03/2018 11:49:40 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Winning the election - he stole it from Hillary with Russian help.
11
posted on
10/03/2018 11:50:31 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"What criminal conduct would that be, Mr. Schitt?"
I'm sure he's referring to the NYT article on President Trump's tax returns.
To: yesthatjallen
Pelosi is smart. She realizes the Rat bases won’t survive an Impeachment of Trump.
13
posted on
10/03/2018 11:51:00 AM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.a pelvic exam.)
To: yesthatjallen
Don’t worry Adam, you’ll NEVER be in the majority again, so you’ll remain impotent.
14
posted on
10/03/2018 11:51:51 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: circlecity
If there was tax evasion in the 1980s, the failing NYT would have uncovered it.
Let the Democrats impeach Trump for the crime of being rich.
15
posted on
10/03/2018 11:53:32 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: yesthatjallen
According to rules as the Democrats make them up, we should have recourse to remove this scoundrel from office even if he’s not out congressman.
16
posted on
10/03/2018 11:53:55 AM PDT
by
Luke21
To: yesthatjallen
OK...let’s look into the Clinton’s, Obama’s, et al...’k?
17
posted on
10/03/2018 11:54:50 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(White Privilege EQUALS Self Control & working 50-80 hrs/wk for 40 years!)
To: yesthatjallen
Schiff: There is legal precedent for impeaching sitting officials over prior criminal conduct Well, then Mr. Schiff, it may be a useful exercise for you to recall just who is in control of your no doubt voluminous FBI file now.
To: yesthatjallen
Can we get the FBI to investigate this ass clown from, let’s say, about the time he was 5.
19
posted on
10/03/2018 11:55:50 AM PDT
by
kempster
To: yesthatjallen
The House can impeach, and the Senate can remove from office, for whatever reasons they please. The courts would refuse to second guess the Congress, since it’s clearly a “political question.”
20
posted on
10/03/2018 11:55:57 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson