Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519

“Wish for it to be different all you want, but facts are facts.”

The facts are that these companies now have idiots on the right looking to fuse a new love of soft nationalization with a completely bizarre idea of what “public” means in a absurd attempt to wrestle control of the operations of private services in the name of your apparently inalienable right to tweet, reblog, or otherwise engage in running flame wars online.

And you are willing to give these damn companies the protection and resources of the state to do that, instead of supporting alternatives and helping to push these companies out of prominence.

Like what will happen if Twitter goes out of business while it is considered an “essential utility”?


16 posted on 09/02/2018 9:43:49 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: VanDeKoik

No one is suggesting giving them protection. But yes, we must insist on even, unbiased commerce. Beyond that, the marketplace can pick the winners and losers.


17 posted on 09/02/2018 9:53:34 AM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson