Skip to comments.
Judge rejects Texas request to block DACA
The Hill ^
| 08/31/18
| Tal Axelrod
Posted on 08/31/2018 1:16:01 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: yesthatjallen
He's just being a judge. They LOVE to say "no" based on technicalities. What he meant was that the states' delays in seeking this relief had induced too many people to materially change their positions in reliance on DACA for him to decide this case based on the sketchy factual record created by the injunction request. So there will be a trial at which he will likely find DACA illegal. And don't hold your breath waiting for him to change his mind, because he won't. DACA is a goner as far as he is concerned.
I saw rulings like this a lot during the 40 years I practiced law.
21
posted on
08/31/2018 4:59:11 PM PDT
by
Thud
To: yesthatjallen
The Court did not grant the preliminary injunction as it found that the States had delayed seeking this relief for years, that the balance of private interests fell in favor of the denial of the requested relief, and that implementing the relief at this point in time was contrary to the best interests of the public, District Judge Andrew Hanen ruled. Admittedly, I have not read the actual decision but from the above quote, it doesn't appear that this was a final decision on the case itself, but simply denial of the request to suspend the program while the case is in progress. He did indicate that he believed that the state would win when the trial is actually held. If I am correct in my reading, it is not a bad decision at all.
22
posted on
08/31/2018 6:50:33 PM PDT
by
etcb
To: yesthatjallen
So SICK of these tin-pot dictators, these district judges, who think they have the power to enforce non-laws. WHEN WILL WE HAVE JUSTICE? When will judges rule FOR AMERICANS instead of MS-13?
23
posted on
08/31/2018 7:02:28 PM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(Enjoy the decline of the American empire.)
To: Zathras
Yep - it was an EO that legally and officially expired - these “judges” are now making their own EOs....
24
posted on
09/01/2018 3:25:52 AM PDT
by
trebb
(So many "experts" with so little experience in what they preach....even here...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson