Posted on 08/02/2018 8:22:37 AM PDT by servo1969
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.
The latest figures include 35% who Strongly Approve of the way Trump is performing and 41% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -6.
(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...
Courage carries capital. Who would have thunk it?
Hey, I looked for this and didn’t see it. Oh well. Delete this thread
I figure that The Donald’s true poll numbers are in the high 60’s or higher.
In this case, it’s worth a second post !
This is real good, unless establishment DC ‘pubs deiiberately throw the November election. Because so much Democrat vote is concentrated in a few areas, that number probably represents winning numbers in a majority of races.
Chelsea Handler and Alyssa Milano (Push-Button-Libs) will be going nuts when they see that 50%
Basically, those who hate Trump hate him with a passion. Nice way for Rasmussen to get a shot in despite what should be considered good news. It would have been for Obama (or Hillary, under the same circumstances).
This!!!
These polls are MEANINGLESS. NOTHING the President does is going to get Demonrats to give a positive indication when a pollster calls them. Also, I have NEVER answered a phone call from a political pollster. Caller ID, which I believe was invented back in the 80’s, allows me and millions of others to opt out. So, their polls are not representative of America. Which is why Hillary LOST.
Good news.
No, Hillary did not loose because the polling was flawed. She lost because more legal voters wanted Donald to win.
Rasmussen is a pretty good poll for consistency. Generally you add 5-7% to the Republican to get the real number.
70% of approvers do so strongly. 80% of disapprovers are losers.
Oh my.
Go Trump!
Meanwhile, a still-young Paul Ryan has achieved the highest office in his chosen profession and is running for the hills.
They're applying numbers (ie objective figures) to a subjective matter. THEN they're performing arithmetic using their made-up figures that do not - and cannot - measure that which they claim to measure.
no, there is no adjustment necessary. They were spot on in 2016.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.