Posted on 07/29/2018 5:50:15 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Saturday pushed back against Facebook for banning conspiracy theorist and InfoWars founder Alex Jones, suggesting the platform was infringing on the First Amendment.
"Am no fan of Jones — among other things he has a habit of repeatedly slandering my Dad by falsely and absurdly accusing him of killing JFK — but who the hell made Facebook the arbiter of political speech? Free speech includes views you disagree with," Cruz tweeted.
Facebook, a private company, announced Friday it had banned Jones from the platform for 30 days over content that it said violated its community guidelines. The site also removed four videos from pages run by Jones and InfoWars after they were reported to the site.
The ban means that Jones's personal page is suspended, barring him from posting content there or sharing content to the Infowars page, according to CNN.
Zuckerberg has faced intense criticism for months over his platform's handling of hate speech and conspiracy theories.
The company said earlier this month that, despite taking down videos and other content pushing hoaxes, Jones’s Infowars account doesn’t qualify for a ban from the platform.
Zuckerberg said in an interview last week that it's difficult for the platform to ban accounts that push conspiracy theories, such as Holocaust denials, because it is "hard to impugn intent" from those users.
The free market will destroy Farcebook, if justice be done.
InfoWars is certainly aptly named.
Tru dat!
Well Ted — it is their FREE web site so, yes, they can pretty much do what they want. WE can also do what we want and mock the web site for its ridiculous bias.
Abandon Fecebook
Every login provides money that is used against US.
I don’t think the government should tell social media that they should publish all legal content but if they were to write a law saying this, they could call it Net Neutrality.
Fakebook is a free enterprise. Government has no business telling it what it can and cannot (or must and must not) publish.
—
Would you make the same argument if, in the next Presidential debate, they let the RAT candidate speak as long as it wished and then limited the Republican to twenty seconds... with the sound down? It’s their TV network, after all.
Not unless they lobby and get in bed with government(s).
And visa versa.
No it is not a free enterprise. It was started with seed money from the CIA technology research agency. Would you be happy if Verizon decided to block all text messages to you when you were identified as a Republican? To make it impossible for phone calls to go through to you because you were known to be a trump voter? Quit making excuses for this Democrat left-wing fascists organization that sucks at the government teat.
I’m almost ready. What a colossal waste of time Facebook is. And Twitter? America’s bathroom wall? Don’t get me started.
At best they are an unregulated political action committee
Facebook is private property and they can decide who gets to use their private property. By the same token, I dont have to use their private property.
A private business is free to set the terms and conditions of service. Progressives love to point that out. In this case I would point it out, except I want to be fully consistent.
Who doubts that the customers of Facebook are fully capable of deciding to accept their terms of service or decline and go elsewhere (like gab.ai !!). Who doubts that the customer could walk away so quickly and in such numbers as to put Facebook out of business? Who doubts that the customers could do this far faster than any government bureaucracy could pass any rule to force Facebook to rethink their policy?
Once again we are at a fork in the road with respect to the Constitution. As far as I am concerned, private property is private property, and that the owner has an unalienable right to decide who to serve and under what terms. Progressives love this as well, that is until I remind them that in the name of civil rights, they destroyed the unalienable property rights of people who owned lunch counters in the south.
As much as I detested how those business people denied blacks basic human dignity of a place to eat and relieve themselves, we could have chosen a path that did not destroy or infringe on the rights of property owners. But no, we allowed government to seize a power that was not enumerated and thus that is really null and void, except that we also allowed government to validate that usurpation of power.
And now we are hinting that we would be happy to see Facebook be turned into a “public accommodation”. Shame on us. And we rant against big and ever bigger government.
It was started with seed money from the CIA technology research agency. Are you saying the didn't build that?
Would you be happy if Verizon decided to block all text messages to you when you were identified as a Republican? To make it impossible for phone calls to go through to you because you were known to be a trump voter?
Hell no, I'd be pissed as hell. So much so, I would find an different provider.
It was started with seed money from the CIA technology research agency.
Are you saying the didn't build that?
Would you be happy if Verizon decided to block all text messages to you when you were identified as a Republican? To make it impossible for phone calls to go through to you because you were known to be a trump voter?
Hell no, I'd be pissed as hell. So much so, I would find an different provider.
Sorry for my double post
bookmark
Oh ... never mind ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.