Creating a New Version of Leviticus to Support Gay Sex

Barbwire ^ | July 23, 2018 | Dr. Michael Brown

[treetopsandroofs]

Please do wonder.

Have a nice day.

[fwdude]

It’s absurd by any measure to claim that the word “homosexual” wasn’t in the original texts. As if English in any form was even around at that time. The concept of homosexuality was widely known, otherwise the writer of Romans wouldn’t have mentioned this sin specifically.

[Othniel]

A cursory examination of ancient Egyptian society and theology would reveal all manner of loose sexuality including: Pharaohs marrying and having children by their daughters and sisters, festivals involving sex and their pantheon of deities, and a tolerance for homosexual sex. The Law given by God had things that pointed specifically to what the Jews had come out of. Each of the plagues was aimed at a specific god of Egypt, and it making the jump from "our God smacked down these gods" to "so here's what you need to do as a result of this...." isn't such a great leap. The "scholar" who is fighting for a revision of the Law is a fool.

[NetAddicted]

Best thing about this article is the fact that homosexuals still think the Bible and Torah are important enough to rewrite its truths.

[NetAddicted]

That’s a very important verse, and very appropriate now.

[jjotto]

Good point.

A ‘Christian’ would have just said we’re now under the ‘Law of Love’, and not that mean ‘Old Law’.

It is strange that even way back 2,000 years ago everyone was fooled by what Leviticus originally said, so much so that it was carried over into the new New Testament.

[NetAddicted]

Bookmarking links.