Me thinks Chris Coon's asked one two many questions. (Vanity)

Today | Justanotherokie

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

When Coons asked if there was Bias, Horowitz said yes there was on the subject of pursuing Trump instead of continuing the Clinton Email probe.

[Conserv]

Coons is so damn ugly that I can’t even stand to look at him.

[Paladin2]

Are poeple today allowed to have a last name of “Coon”?

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

I had a teacher with the name Coons once. It must have sucked.

[Jeff Chandler]

[newfreep]

' ,

[Popman]

Chris Coons is one of the few liberals who can make a reasonable point without sounding like a complete moonbat
...

I didn’t say he was right...just reasonable...

[Intolerant in NJ]

Horowitz said yes there was on the subject of pursuing Trump instead of continuing the Clinton Email probe...he said it at least a half-dozen times over the afternoon - when it comes to the October incident we did not find that there was not bias - if only just one Republican had been smart enough to pick up on it and make him repeat it three times before making him explain himself in full........

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

Well he made an assumption and fell flat on his face.

Play it back, he was the last questioner.

[NTHockey]

Coons is a self-avowed Marxist. He is a Senator thanks to the vindictive GOPe.

[mass55th]

If there was no political bias, why did the FBI reimburse the travel expenses of Russian dossier author Christopher Steele to meet in Rome with an FBI contact?

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

One of my friends in school was named Richard Coon. Always got a snicker during roll call. “Coon Dick” “Coon Dick!”

[JohnBrowdie]

he is a senator because republicans did something insane — on a roy moore level of derangement— in the primaries.

I don’t think you’re going to find any buyers for your christine o’donnell argument now that everyone has sobered up.

[Roccus]

...if only just one Republican had been smart enough to pick up on it...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[leaning conservative]

I’m completely confused by this tiny piece. Is there more, a link or am I,

Clueless in Mississippi?

[fieldmarshaldj]

Baloney. Coons was to play the Democrat ringer for ultraleftist RINO Castle. O’Donnell upset the arrangement and the establishment had to scramble to kneecap her and install Coons instead. Couldn’t have an outsider Conservative serving as Senator. I’ve seen that little trick countless times.

[NTHockey]

Wrong, GOPe voted for Coons. You weren’t in Delaware; I am.

[Sa-teef]

Chris Coons is one of the few liberals who can make a reasonable point without sounding like a complete moonbat ...I didn’t say he was right...just reasonable.."

I watched his questioning and he looked like a lying sack of.....to me. Twice he repeated the lie that 20 people associated with Trump have been indicted by Mueller and then he proceeded to name the charges against Mannafort that are a decade old, implying that this should stick to Trump.

Poor little hater Coon wasn't counting on Ted Cruz to show-up and give the actual, final round of questioning. Cruz ripped Wray a new hole in the process.

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

A blatant admission of Bias by the IG.

[NutsOnYew]

Here is a question we all need to be asking: Who is Amanda Renteria in relation to Loretta Lynch? According to Horowitz, the classified section of the OIG report contains among other things, a classified email from AG Loretta Lynch to Renteria. Horowitz not only said he cannot talk about it in public, but that the email is classified so high that most members of congress don't have sufficient clearance to see it. Makes me think it is Gang of 8-only kind of level.

Now, here's the fun part from Wikipedia: Leaked emails of John Podesta show that the Hillary Clinton campaign was looking for a "Hispanic woman" for the position of political director of her 2016 presidential campaign. Following the loss to Valadao, Renteria was hired to fill that position.

So, there is an email from the AG to a Clinton aide that receives the highest top level classified status. I wonder what the date on that email is. Purely speculating, if the date is shortly before or slightly after the Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting, this could be the smoking gun that blows that cover story of a chance meeting apart.

This is for what it is worth. The first two paragraphs are factual. The third paragraph is just a guess and not an effort to start a conspiracy. And I fully admit that your guess is as good as mine.