Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Over 100k voters' names left off rolls in Los Angeles County
The Hill ^ | 06/05/18 | Lisa Hagen

Posted on 06/05/2018 9:21:29 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: yesthatjallen

I worked the polls yesterday. A number of individuals found that their names were missing from the poll books (they had been there previously). We also had a registration list of all voters in the district, and their names were on it. We gave them provisional ballots.

Later in the day I looked over the list and found the reason. In New Jersey only Republican, Democrat or unaffiliated are recognized. Unaffiliated must declare a recognized party to vote in any primary. The individuals in question were listed as Libertarian and Green party. The Ls took R ballots; the Greenie took a D ballot.

So it appears that they are simplifying the books by leaving out the irrelevant voters. But by taking an R or D provisional, I assume they are declaring for that party. You can’t change parties at the polls, but if unaffiliated you may affiliate. Since those other parties are not recognized, those voters, I assume, are considered unaffiliated.

When I ran that past the borough clerk she was as confused as the rest of us!


21 posted on 06/06/2018 7:34:30 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
The left in NJ is calling for a return to paper ballots, claiming hacking our machines is easy. Let's examine that.

Our machines are NOT connected to any phone line, internet link or anything outside. Each machine, when first turned on in the morning, prints out a "zero proof" which shows any votes in the machine. If it is not all zeroes, we are to call the board of elections and not use that machine. It has never happened yet in our district, and I've not heard of it happening anywhere else.

So the only way a machine can be "hacked" would be at the warehouse in which it is stored between elections. Two machines per district, and hundreds of districts would require hundreds of RAT operatives working the warehouses to jigger the machines. Highly impractical, though not impossible. But there would have to be a few non-RAT techs who would expose the violation if they saw it.

Bottom line- I believe that they want to go back to paper because it is simpler to cheat by swapping out boxes or bags of ballots and "losing" or "finding" them, or adding additional markings (overvotes) to invalidate those that go against them than it is to jigger machines.

As BOR used to say, Where am I going wrong?

22 posted on 06/06/2018 7:59:00 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Absolute and scary B S you write!


23 posted on 06/06/2018 8:18:43 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...excepto for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
Absolute and scary B S you write!

I think no one with more than two functioning brain cells would wish for that, but sooner or later, something gotta give. I hope I am wrong, but we shall see.

24 posted on 06/06/2018 8:27:07 AM PDT by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

“The Dems just HATE free and fair elections.”

The Dems AND about half the voting population of the United States. It’s the AND part that is the most troubling in the long term. This will not end well or peacefully, unless that AND half can be reduced significantly.


25 posted on 06/06/2018 8:29:47 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Old time Democrat voter suppression, aka ballot manipulation.


26 posted on 06/06/2018 9:43:27 AM PDT by Ron H.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Bottom line- I believe that they want to go back to paper because it is simpler to cheat by swapping out boxes or bags of ballots and "losing" or "finding" them, or adding additional markings (overvotes) to invalidate those that go against them than it is to jigger machines.

Oh, and I forgot counting votes "creatively".

27 posted on 06/07/2018 8:46:56 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson