I don’t believe Robinson is a secondary problem either. He’s one of the few people speaking out. But for those that take that tact, I wanted to provide a reasonable voice for that side of the argument.
Murray makes a lot of good points, but I also feel that he expresses a major point somewhat poorly.
I heard a story once about a mafia don (Vito Genovese?) who, if you went to him and told him of a disloyal member of the family, he would have the disloyal member killed. And then he’d have you killed for ratting out the first guy.
The UK is being told by Tommy Robinson that Islamic terrorists are a problem. The UK is having Tommy Robinson “killed” for ratting out the problem people. Murray, I think, sees Robinson as a “secondary problem”. For the mafia don, Robinson would be “second in line” to be killed. But for the UK, Robinson is really the one and only problem. The UK “deals with” Robinson and ignores the Islamic terrorists.
This cannot go on forever. The UK has shown fear and unwillingness to deal with violent people who openly transgress the rules of civilized behavior — the Islamics do whatever they want. Well, eventually more people like Tommy Robinson will take to the streets. They can see that the government doesn’t really know how to deal with them if they REALLY cross the line. So they will. Soon.