Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS will dig into debate over alleged cemetery on Pa. farm [property rights]
Philly.com ^ | 5/24/2018 | Jason Nark

Posted on 05/25/2018 7:44:47 AM PDT by dirtboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Reno89519

I’ve never heard of a situation where access to a cemetery wasn’t allowed, even the old ones.

Part and parcel (pun intended) of getting land w/burials.

Access doesn’t mean folks can wander willy-nilly all around your property. They can go to site directly.

In that situation, I’d put a fence around it and a path leading to it, but I’m a cemetery-friendly person. I actually considered buying a lot once, that had an old family cemetery on it. Thought it would be neat. Something to research, etc..


61 posted on 05/25/2018 9:11:37 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

We’re planning on being buried on our property. Heck, if my wife dies first I’ll just bury her and send an email to the kids. (hyperbole) Hmmm, maybe I could keep getting the SS payments. :)

My wife got in a lot of hot water with her parents in law when her first husband died at age 27. She honored his wishes and, after he was cremated, scattered the ashes on a cascade mountain foot trail. She couldn’t find the site now if her life depended on it.

My wife and I are very old school and a bit anarchist when it comes to our bodies. God, not the state, gave us them. If I die and my wife wants to thrown my body on a bonfire, that’s nobody’s business but hers. Same if she dies first and I throw the body in a pit and bury it. The body is nothing after you die. It is an irrelevance.

But then, I’m coming from a Christian perspective. Non-Christians may see it differently.

They never fully forgave her.


62 posted on 05/25/2018 9:13:25 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
He said he sought permission from Knick to visit the property and claimed he had seen the tombstones there. “My only interest is getting in there and honoring them,” Vail said by phone Wednesday. “I don’t want the cemetery. Good grief.” Knick, who purchased the farm in 1970 to raise horses, denies Vail ever personally spoke to her. She claims she first caught wind of the issue in 2008, when it was was being discussed at public meetings.

I would grant permission, if asked, but with some mutually-agreed restrictions on frequency, duration, and timing. If the first I heard was a lawsuit, I would fight to the death to block such a predatory person from any access to my property. People who file suits before talking with neighbors are dangerous and not to be trusted.

63 posted on 05/25/2018 9:14:18 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

The cemetery is obviously landlocked. Landlocked parcels come with an automatic access easement to a public highway. It’s happened thousands of times. It’s not a question of “taking” at all. It’s going to get thrown out.


64 posted on 05/25/2018 9:14:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Knick, who purchased the farm in 1970 to raise horses, denies Vail ever personally spoke to her.

So after not being interested for at least 40 odd years, this is suddenly a burning issue for Vail?

65 posted on 05/25/2018 9:15:56 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victikms, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

We don’t know wen the 85 yr old Mr Vail found the burial record.


66 posted on 05/25/2018 9:18:50 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Apparently Mr. Vail knew about it. And I'm betting the buyer knew also.....whether she says so or not.

Was working on an estate. The old man died in 1840 and there was an existing cemetery on the property. When it was divided between the heirs (1841), the wife got 34 acres (1/3) and it contained this little cemetery. The cemetery was NOT even mentioned in the deed.

The bounds of the cemetery weren't defined until 1905....about 100 x 300....Access was by an old path between the highway and the cemetery....and there was nothing in the 1905 deed about access. And yet, it always existed and still does.

67 posted on 05/25/2018 9:24:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

This really is a conundrum and sounds like it’s just two grumpy old people butting heads. ;-)


68 posted on 05/25/2018 9:26:28 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

ALL cemeteries have visitation rules etc etc...


69 posted on 05/25/2018 9:27:23 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
I agree....Define the bounds of the cemetery and provide access to the highway. I'm sure that's what the courts will do in the end.

This is NOT a "taking" case per se. It's the right to access a landlocked property.

70 posted on 05/25/2018 9:30:03 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
ALL cemeteries have visitation rules etc etc...

As it should be.

71 posted on 05/25/2018 9:32:20 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Agreed but it sounds like SCOTUS is more focused on her Catch-22 in court filings.

The outcome will be interesting.

72 posted on 05/25/2018 9:32:41 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

If you come on this ranch without our permission under the claim that you wish to visit your ancestors then you will be joining them.


73 posted on 05/25/2018 9:36:23 AM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

This issue came up in MA recently. Court found for the plaintiffs. No private rights to old cemetery on private land.


74 posted on 05/25/2018 9:41:13 AM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

My comment to you was dripping with sarcasm. Reverence for human remains predate Christianity, to wit Romans and Jews certainly, but Neaderthals and most pre historic societies did it as well. Who built the Roman catacombs with Christian burials? The municipal sanitary brigade? All early Christians adopted the traditions of their society whether Roman, Eygptian, Jewish, Celts, etc. Christian graves very early on became unique within local tradition and Christian grave are easily recognized when discovered.


75 posted on 05/25/2018 9:48:12 AM PDT by centurion316 (Back from exile from 4/2016 until 4/2018.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Massachusetts objects to private property rights across the board so their ruling is no big surprise.


76 posted on 05/25/2018 9:51:26 AM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

You want public access to your ancestors then bury them on public land (or land with access rights), or retain an easement when you sell the property. After a few generations thousands could claim access the private property.


77 posted on 05/25/2018 9:51:51 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I’ve got four private family cemeteries in my family, three of them all under one surname, mine. There’s the active one dating to the Civil War era, the second one which is inactive and the third one which is inactive and dating to the colonial era. The colonial era one has several Revolutionary War veterans buried in it, but the town grew away from it, the road was moved, the land fell out of descendants’ hands in the Depression. It’s been interesting to get it maintained and to prevent looting or vandalism., even though the law in NC is favorable to descendants having a right to visit family burial sites regardless of where they’re situated or who currently holds title to the land. There should have been an easement recorded in this instance, that runs with the deed as the property is sold and changes hands. And, maintenance of the easement falls to the descendants, not to the property owner. Only obligation on the property owner is to not obstruct access and not damage or alter the graveyard. One family burying ground of mine is so old the road doesn’t go anywhere near it anymore. That one is back in the woods and a pretty good hike to get to. We try to clean them all up for Easter and try to maintain them but old marble tombstones will eventually erode and break. Big expense to replace, so they’re often not replaced.


78 posted on 05/25/2018 10:02:44 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

I guess I’m the sentimentalist.

I know the gravesite does not contain the person I remember. But it is a tangible, physical reminder of them. A place on earth dedicated — on earth, where I knew them — to them and to our memories of them.

I don’t go there in the illusion that they are there. But I know that I am.

And Christians have historically been as devoted to the respectful preservation of human remains as anyone. Christ Himself was honorably interred, even though He had no intention of staying long.


79 posted on 05/25/2018 10:06:57 AM PDT by IronJack (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

We have had a problem with unrelated, unknown individuals turning up buried in our active private family cemetery. The funeral services are supposed to contact to make certain they’re entitled to be buried there but they don’t always. What are we supposed to do, spend money to dig them up? So they’re there. Like cowbirds.


80 posted on 05/25/2018 10:08:05 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson