Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

Because this is so politicized, I would go with a simple rule:

If he’s not dangerous enough to lock up and keep behind bars, he’s not dangerous enough to take and keep his guns. I would go further and say that even convicted felons should regain their gun rights as soon as they are no longer under the control of the criminal justice system. If someone isn’t safe to hold firearms, they should have been given a longer sentence behind bars.


6 posted on 04/13/2018 10:42:54 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

^^^^THIS^^^^

Call it the Custodial Rule for Constitutional Rights Retention.

Only those authorized and responsible for providing for the personal defense of those in custody can deprive a person of their private means of self-defense.


33 posted on 04/13/2018 11:53:17 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Pollster1

Re #6: Thoughtful comments.


34 posted on 04/13/2018 12:22:25 PM PDT by libertylover (If people come here legally, they're immigrants; if they come here illegally, they're invaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson