Posted on 04/04/2018 9:48:03 AM PDT by fishtank
.
White is an angry revisionist that destroys only his own red-faced baseless arguments.
The KJV is based on thousands of MS known as the “received texts.” The Hort-Westcott Greek is based only on their desire to disprove the diety of our savior.
None of their thopusands of differences with the received texts are based on evidence. Instead they are based on obviously modified portions of Vaticanus and Sinaitcus. The erasures are in every case boldly obvious.
Gail Riplinger’s marvelous work in exposing Hort and Westcott is the best place to begin your study.
.
.
We will only have “the Bible” when all of the NT writings are found in the original Hebrew language.
So far we have Matthew, Luke and John’s gospels, but as Gordon continues his dilligent search, I’m sure the Holy Spirit will continue lead him to more. This is how Judah will be lead into faith.
.
I haven’t heard the name Scofield in ages.
“My faith is built on nothing less than Scofield’s notes and Moody Press”
Your source for this information?
I thought it was 'Scripture Press'... ;-)
.
It was revealed by Rood at the Passover gathering in Charlotte Saturday.
The gospels were located by Nehemiah Gordon some months ago but kept under wraps until they were actually in Gordon’s possession.
Gordon is a magician at locating significant Biblical MS.
He found 28 copies of the original Hebrew Matthew in various university archives over the last decade.
.
It has nothing to do with an adoration of archaic phraseology for many (myself included).
It has to do with (Frankfurt School) Higher Criticism, and the subversive elevation of Westcott-Hort over the Received Text.
Yep. See my prior post.
The original languages are the source text.
You can’t use KJV to go back and correct the Hebrew/Aramaic/Greek.
KJV is a good translation but not perfect. No translation can be perfect.
Well, yes. What in my reply seems to have led you to believe that I might think otherwise?
Ummm..
But do you have a source. You know, as in verifiable link? (This is, after all, FR..)
.
He held framed copies of the first page of each for all to see.
Gordon may have something soon on his site at Hebrew University.
I can’t imagine what good a link would do for you, but it is highly likely that Rood will have something on his site too.
As for the actual text being available online, that for the near future is most unlikely! Even the ShemTov is hard to get online.
it is highly likely that Rood will have something on his site
Well then, how about a link for that?
That is the man.
Probably the most incredible Bible scholar on Earth.
But what does that do for you WRT the recently discovered gospel texts?
There are no links to access the texts.
Patience is all that I can suggest.
i switched from the NIV to David Sterns Complete Jewish Bible an worship at a Messianic Synagogue as a retired
Pastor I enjoy getting back to the historic Feasts mandated an their significance by the time the church got to the Nicene council they were run by a bunch of anti semetic folks an I don’t believe that was the Lords plan but man sticking his big fat face into it.Once you get to Contstantine claiming all Romans are Christians it was downhill slide form there.
Well, I guess I’ll let White speak for himself:
What’s the Big Deal with King James Onlyism? Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNGa_dRTNMo&t=127s
There are, I believe six parts It is in response to the Gipp video.
As with most men, I don’t agree with white on everything, but he owns it in these videos.
Truth! The word of Yehova that is hidden behind the word of the adversary in every modern corruption. (they're not translations, read Hort and Westcott’s letters and the well known history of their lives, and it will become clear that their work is an asault against the word.)
Its not “KJV onlyism!” The Geneva is equivalent to the KJV, and the apocryphal writings are important too, especially the Maccabees. One cannot grasp the realities of first century Judea without full understanding of the Maccabee revolt, and subsequent casting out of Helenism.
The biggest thing wrong in the KJV is the italicised nonsense that changes the truth into confusion, but that same confusion and falsehood is carried in the modern corruptions without the italics to make it more difficult to filter it out.
White has made himself the advocate of the lie.
I disagree.
.
You can only cheat yourself.
The challenge I have is with any absolutism I see on this. Fact is, ANY and ALL English translations are interpretations. I hold none of them in “special” regard, though I do think a few are hopelessly flawed.
What we call “the bible” is actually a library of 66 separate books and letters. I don’t think of it even as a single book any more. And though, in Timothy, it is clearly described as useful for a number of things, e.g. learning, most of my enlightenment comes from prayer and observation, with pretty much any bible helping that.
And if I get REALLY confused, I have the greek and hebrew Lexicons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.