Posted on 03/28/2018 11:33:11 AM PDT by MNDude
A 100% gold standard will reduce the risk of both inflation and deflation and create a more stable monetary system.
> Any profits of the federal reserve are turned over to the Treasury and the control is the federal appointment and Senate ratified of the Chairman and Board of Governors.
What a crock. Even if this was true, the largest share of profit comes from being repayed the principle, which was created -out-of-thin-air-.
If I am a _federal_reserve_ bank and you want to borrow $1,000. I create $1000 out-of-thin-air, and loan it to you at say 10% interest. Legally you must pay me back $1100. So I give $100 to treasury and keep $1000 which I didn’t have to begin with. I made 10 times as much money as the treasure.
As if the price of gold can’t be manipulated. Feh.
An 18th Century economist named Richard Cantillon described the localized effects of printed money, and how the "first handlers" of newly printed money always get the benefits of it. In America's case, Wall Street and the major Federal Reserve banks that rec'd this QE money rec'd the greatest benefits.
That tells you that Gold is way undervalued.
Existing $$ will be recalled
New $$ valued in gold will be issued.
Existing $$ have no real value and are a state of mind
It's an educated guess, but the IMF and the World Gold Council keep pretty good track of who has what.
_federal_reserve_ has and is destroying USA. It represents globalism and the transfer of USA industry to other nations. It loans money to non-USA entities and has done so from the beginning.
Return to USConstitution, or perish.
The Fed won’t like that at all.
centripital force.
Fixed it.
That would require a degree of honesty that is not possible amongst all the purchased politicians.
That too...................
Rather than trying to tie the dollar to a specific amount of gold a better solution would be to change the laws to allow contracts and taxes to be paid in Gold,silver or what else the parties ageeed upon.
geshams law will take care of the rest.
So each dollar bill would represent 1.88694808339406709337e−5 ounce per dollar (0.00001886948083394067 oz. per $)
So each ounce of gold would have to be currently valued at $52,995.63 to account for the current U.S. money supply?
U.S. would have to increase their gold reserves by a lot to avoid wild price swings when The Fed plays with the "M3" money supply? Or increase gold reserves to keep the current gold price? Or ? (I haven't read the Bill...does it mention "the math"?) Comments?
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m2
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/rpt/goldRpt/current_report.htm
Does the bill get pulled from consideration if all its sponsors accidentally commit suicide?
I agree. The chances of this ever happening are nil. That said, it would put the Fed and the federal government as we know it out of business. It would result in a market crash that would make Black Tuesday pale by comparison. In two years we would be fully recovered and experience a permanent, non-inflationary boom.
We had inflation, depressions, and boom-and-bust business cycles when we were on the gold standard. Why would those go away if we resumed it?
I guess what is being proposed is locking the gold - dollar ratio. But how would that work in practice? What would prevent another run on US Gold (assuming there is any) like the one that originally caused use to end the gold standard?
That ability to exchange at a fixed rate turned into a problem for us under Nixon, which is why he took us off the gold standard to start with. We had set a fixed exchange rate: $40 an oz. When our inflation was at about 6% a bunch of countries decided they would rather have the gold. We has a big outflow of gold in a short amount of time: France took $171 million in one day.
So Nixon closed the gold window, ending convertibility.
I don't see how you undo that.
I suppose the idea is to go all the way back to time before FDR confiscated American's money and replaced it all with Fedbux. But a *lot* of water has gone over the damn since then, that is to say our currency has been massively debased.
Here's what it might look like:
Gold is at $1350 an oz. So, if we set the price today a dollar would be 1/1350th of a oz.
The last time we started an official gold standard was 1900 (ending "bi-metalism").
..the dollar consisting of twenty-five and eight-tenths grains (1.67 g) of gold nine-tenths fine, as established by section thirty-five hundred and eleven of the Revised Statutes of the United States, shall be the standard unit of value, and all forms of money issued or coined by the United States shall be maintained at a parity of value with this standard...
This is pretty much what the $20 Gold Liberty Head Double Eagle coin was: it contained 33.431 grams (sorry for unit change) of 90% gold. Again, doing the math 30.8 grams of pure gold. A troy oz is 31.1 grams, so, holders were getting almost exactly (just a miniscule .3 grams less) than one oz of gold in that $20 gold piece. (And, historically the 10% non-gold in US money was silver, so you got 2.4 grams of that "for free" in each dollar.
NOW That's convertibility!
So, lets say we wanted to have honest money like that again. One dollar is 1/1350th of a troy oz, so $20 would be 20/1350ths. Or 1/67th of an oz.
The smallest fractional oz coin currently manufactured by any mint that I am aware of is 1/20th of an oz, and they are damn small. Where as the old $20 gold piece was a chunky coin of 1.3" in diameter and weighing 33 grams, or 1 troy oz. the new one would weigh only 0.015 of a troy oz, or .46 of a gram. (Don't sneeze, your going to lose that $20 gold "piece").
Small factional gold coins available today:
We are getting to the practical limits with the 1/20th of an oz coin (some would say, we've passed it), here are the 1/10th and 1/20th in comparison.
Nonsense. It would put no limits on growth -- prices would simply decrease to create something we've never seen in our lifetimes: currency inflation and price deflation.
“It’s an educated guess, but the IMF and the World Gold Council keep pretty good track of who has what. “
OK. Which number is correct? China has 1.8k tonnes but mines 0.5k tons per year?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.