Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

H.R.5404 - To define the dollar as a fixed weight of gold.
congress.gov ^

Posted on 03/28/2018 11:33:11 AM PDT by MNDude

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last
To: DesertRhino

Those were only some of the things the government pays for but the raw numbers are deceptive.

What is the value of its assets? More or less than the total debt? The Grand Canyon, the Hoover Damn, all the property it owns including most of the Western States?


101 posted on 03/28/2018 11:04:35 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Freedomlibertyjustice

The bi-metalic standard - gold and silver- did not hamper capitalists and financiers in the 19th century.


102 posted on 03/28/2018 11:07:14 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

They will ALL be sent DOWN to where it’s HOT and DARK, soon enough...............................


103 posted on 03/29/2018 6:09:10 AM PDT by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Money has other uses than as a store of value and they work against it. One of the uses is as a medium of exchange which is the more important.

Money is not defined explicitly but is a function of the velocity of circulation. M.V.= P.Q hence M=PQ/V. or the money supply is derived from Prices, Quantity produced, and the Velocity of circulation.

Gold would devolve into the exchange of paper when purchases were made. Even a dollar is 1/1300th of an ounce of gold. Hence small transactions will have to have a means of exchange therefore it will be “Pay to Barer” on a piece of paper.

Milton Friedman is, as you know, one of the strongest advocates of the Free Market. His solution to the Money Problem was to just set the growth at 3% and let it go.


104 posted on 03/29/2018 8:55:42 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: veracious

Hamilton was obsessed with preserving the Union and all his policies were directed to that end. He was an American, not a Virginian, or a Rhode Islander. If only we had more leaders and thinkers like him.

Hamilton knew and understood the Constitution as only a handful of men did. He not only played a major role in writing it but was the strongest and most adamant in calling for the Convention. Because of his advocacy it was ratified. He wrote two-thirds of the definitive explanation of the Constitution- the Federalist. Possibly the greatest work of political science since 1800. It is probable that without his voice the Constitution would have never been ratified.

One cannot admire Hamilton too much,his life was a marvel and his work for the US without parallel.

A nightmare would be for states to have more power. I live in Illinois, the mini-California.


105 posted on 03/29/2018 9:18:02 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mjp

A GS produces deflation since the money supply cannot be expanded to accommodate increasing business. This is why we have had banks for the last 6-700 years.


106 posted on 03/29/2018 9:22:21 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: veracious

How does the fed hold that 1000 but as bonds? So the fed owns an increasing amount of the public debt. It is also not mandatory to get the debt alive, it can cancel it.


107 posted on 03/29/2018 9:26:58 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Thibodeaux

Its value is what it can buy. That is its basic function in any case.

Paper money is paper money.


108 posted on 03/29/2018 9:29:43 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

CASE CLOSED!


109 posted on 03/29/2018 9:34:11 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: veracious

The run on the dollar was the result of the spending on the Vietnam War. War knocks the GS out of balance and results in incontrovertible money i.e. no GS.


110 posted on 03/29/2018 9:42:41 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

The Constitution provides Congress with the authority to carry out its powers which does not exclude chartering corporations. See Article 1, Section 8, paragraph 20.

“To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into into Execution the forgoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof.”

There is all the proof in the world that the law was and is constitutional.


111 posted on 03/30/2018 10:11:47 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

anyone remember kitco showing zeros before?


112 posted on 03/31/2018 2:07:33 AM PDT by Therapsid (eagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
The Constitution provides Congress with the authority to carry out its powers which does not exclude chartering corporations.

The Supreme Court decided otherwise in their McCulloch v. Maryland decision.

113 posted on 03/31/2018 3:56:05 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Actually the ruling found the direct opposite.

Maryland’s tax was declared to be unconstitutional and voided.

The case had many implications and greatly expanded what was implied in the constitution. Included was that there was no reason to presume that the Bank was unconstitutional.

Marshll’s ruling was essentially Hamilton’s explanation wrt the constitutionality of laws not explicitly specified in the document. He said that before any case was considered he checked to see what Hamilton had said about the subject and the Federalist.

Your comment could not be more incorrect.


114 posted on 03/31/2018 12:34:18 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson