Posted on 03/12/2018 8:15:25 AM PDT by Liberty7732
During the civil rights battles of the 1960s, New England, New York, and the Upper Midwest were most in favor of racial integration in the South, while being quite hypocritical in their own backyard, as evidenced by the massive resistance to school integration in Boston or "white flight" in Northern cities from Boston to Milwaukee.
Upon a successful ruling for the U.S. any local official found in violation would be subject to an enjoinment order. Violating that is contempt of court. That would be enforced by US marshals taking the official into custody. Any armed opposition to these actions would literally bring the wrath of god down on the perps. They won’t know what hit them. The feds don’t have swat teams and multi year ammo and arms contracts for nothing.
It most likely will not get this far, but if it did one example would end it everywhere.
Talking about anything more than this is unfettered bs.
Big shot talk form union uber alles types is just that, talk.
There are not enough soldiers to occupy Sacramento let alone the whole state.
“Federal troops were sent to Alabama and Mississippi to enforce integration. Why should California be treated differently?”
It shouldn’t but it will. For a couple reasons...
1. The propaganda organs (the media) will side with California and stake out the moral high ground. The media was on the side of integration.
2. Both Republican and Democrat federal administration were for integration, whereas in this case once a democrat administration took over, not only would it turn a blind eye to what California is doing but would turn the whole country into California.
A secession will not lead to war. What idiocy id on display here.
There is no downside to the halt of the importation of cheap Gook made crap.
You’d be OK if it were cheap crap made by white people?
Ok zipperheads if you prefer.
My girlfriend is Asian and I might have been offended by your posts if I took you seriously, but I’ve come to know you as such an ‘effing loser than I won’t even bother reporting your racist, inflammatory posts.
Don't be so sure about that.
The radical leftist politicians in California are only the tip of the iceberg. Millions of their citizens hold the same radical views. Merely arresting their leaders won't have any effect on their thinking, and may even spur the leftist populace to organized rebellion.
California is so off the rails at this point, I don't see how we bring it back in line without the use of massive, overwhelming force.
And those Northern cities are still waaaaaay more segregated than any city down here.
During times of Constitutional crisis, yes.
A happy thought, but unrealistic.
There are millions of hard core, radical leftists in California. They're not going to suddenly change their thinking and mend their ways because a few of their leaders are jailed.
The big box retail stores would lose their supply chain stream of Chinese junk. What a delicious fantasy.
This is a prime example of what follows from the failure to timely act. The arrogant, contemptuous behavior we are now witnessing didn’t get to this point overnight. It started decades ago, in liberal political enclaves across the country that seized upon the time-old practice of churches serving as sanctuaries. At no time in this long history were federal prosecutors willing to use existing criminal harboring statutes to nip the budding movement before it fully bloomed. Now, like a smart aleck juvenile delinquent, we have California sticking its middle finger straight in the face of the U.S. AG. And, what is the best that the chief law enforcement officer in the land is capable of doing? File a civil injunctive lawsuit, which guarantees months or years of future litigation as the pressure in the pressure cooker keeps rising and some call this decisive AG action? Give me a break.
This is why a ruthless occupation of CA may be necessary. The DemonShits have stolen CA from its legal and legitimate citizens by having several million or more illegals vote in its elections. The occupation would have to purge the voter rolls of illegals and traitors, then return the state to its legitimate citizens.
“Does the Federal Govt have the authority to place the state under Martial Law?”
If it gets that far, the federal government could dust off the 1867-68 Reconstruction Act. It begins by appointing a military governor, backed by troops.
Cut off ALL federal monies to California.................
Ask any Caifornian, and he’ll tell you they pay out more in federal taxes than they get back in federal funding. The solution is pretty obvious.
And that puts us right back to where we are today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.