This Democrat Has Earned Pro-Life Americans' Trust - Now He Needs Our Help

Townhall ^ | 03/10/2018 | Jonathan Frank

[Sans-Culotte]

There is no such thing as a Pro-life democrat. Lipinski is either not pro-life, or he needs to change parties.

[BubbaJunebug]

So what...he’s a D...

[Bonemaker]

He is a Chicago democrat with all the crap that goes with that. But if these fools must have a democrat then he is probably the better choice in the primary.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: There is no such thing as a Pro-life democrat. Lipinski is either not pro-life, or he needs to change parties.

The article states that he supports every Democrat agenda EXCEPT the one on abortion. I see no reason why he should change parties, not especially to the GOP. That will only muddy the already dirty waters.

Heck, I know of many Republicans ( women especially ) who really should be Democrat.

[WP Lonestar]

“”” He opposed the Republican tax reform bill, he voted to uphold the flawed Dodd-Frank law, and while he voted against Obamacare at the time of its passage, he opposed the latest GOP-led repeal efforts.”””

I wouldn’t piss down a democrat’s throat if their guts were on fire.

No doubt he also favors gun control, appeasement of Islamic states and yet Townhall is encouraging conservatives to support him? Really?

Yeah this type of single issue voting and accepting other evils because an evil one holds the same opinion as you on one issue is why our country was almost in the toilet the last 20 years.
Islam is against gay marriage...so.. I assume Townhall would suggest we support the ISIS leader for congress on that basis correct?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: ... and yet Townhall is encouraging conservatives to support him? Really?

What is the alternative?

[TWhiteBear]

Mr. Frank, I as glad I am not a revolting scum like you.
I have seen this fraud time and time again over the year.
A liberal takes One conservative position and beats it to a pulp and then votes Liberal on everything else. You choose a wedge issue, split the conservatives and go back to the Big Trough.
It can work both ways though.I had a friend, old real cowboy, who ran as a Democrat in a conservative area. The deal was, that he would vote for any income tax bill passed by the Legislature, they would support him, and he could vote Conservative on everything else.
He knew that income tax bills would never be approved so he basically got a free pass.
So don't fall for this glib ploy to vote for a Liberal.
TWB

[SeekAndFind]

OK< what is the alternative?

According to the article .... Lipinski holds a narrow lead over his far-left opponent ahead of the March 20th primary. The victor will face an unserious “Republican” opponent who is an outspoken Holocaust denier and has already been rightly disavowed by the state GOP.

[Dr. Ursus]

Perfect!

[ealgeone]

Push comes to shove on this issue and he’ll support the Party. Mark it down.

[bigbob]

You say that as if there was a true difference between the R and D branches of the Uniparty.

[nobamanomore]

I agree, what’s one pro life Dem going to get done in the party of death.

[GRRRRR]

I hate Illinois Democrats!

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Bart Stupak.

Enough said.

[rrrod]

NEVER! No such thing as a good Democrat...like child molesters and mussies!

[Bryanw92]

>>and it will demand that each of us look past party labels

Single issue voters are the bane our existence.

[WhattheDickens?]

Choice A-Democrat who favors infanticide. Choice B-Democrat who consistently votes pro-life. Apparently there are a lot of pro-lifers here unwilling to actually vote pro-life. Astonishing.

[Randy Larsen]

I would never help a democrat, pro life or not!

[taxcontrol]

Sorry, I don’t vote for, send money to, or support any Democrat. I have been screwed over too many times.