Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hidden Agenda or Ignorance?
Townhall.com ^ | March 7, 2018 | Walter E. Williams

Posted on 03/07/2018 6:08:38 AM PST by Kaslin

Before we discuss violence with guns, I'd like to run a couple of questions by you. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, every day nearly 30 Americans die in motor vehicle crashes that involve drunk driving. What kind of restrictions should be placed on automobile ownership? Should there be federal background checks in order for people to obtain a driver's license or purchase a car?

The FBI's 2015 Uniform Crime Report shows that nearly three times more people were stabbed or hacked to death than were killed with shotguns and rifles combined. The number of shotgun and rifle deaths totaled 548. People who were stabbed or hacked to death totaled 1,573. Should there be federal background checks and waiting periods for knife purchases?

Any mature and reasonable person would argue that it is utter nonsense to deal with drunk driving deaths and knife deaths by having federal background checks and waiting periods to obtain a driver's license or to purchase a car or knife. One would recognize, just as courts and the general public do, that cars and knives are inanimate objects and cannot act on their own. Therefore, if we want to do something about deaths resulting from drunk driving or being stabbed or hacked to death, we must focus on individuals. It would be folly and gross negligence of victims for us to focus on inanimate objects like cars and knives. Guns are also inanimate objects and like cars and knives cannot act on their own. It's also plain folly to focus on guns in the cases of shooting deaths.

What about the availability of guns? It turns out that for most of our history, a person could walk into hardware and department stores or a gun store, virtually anywhere in the United States, and purchase a rifle or pistol. The 1902 Sears mail-order catalog had 35 pages of firearm advertisements. Other catalogs and magazines from the 1940s, '50s and '60s were full of gun advertisements directed to both youngsters and parents. "What Every Parent Should Know When a Boy or Girl Wants a Gun" was published by the National Shooting Sports Foundation. Another magazine advertised "Get This Cowboy Carbine with Your Christmas Money." Just a few states even had age restrictions for buying guns. Private transfers of guns to juveniles were unrestricted. Often a 12th or 14th birthday present, from a father to his son, was a shiny new .22 caliber rifle.

Today, there is far less availability of shotguns, rifles and pistols than any time in our history. That historical fact should raise the question: Despite the greater accessibility to guns in previous decades, why wasn't there the kind of violence we see with today's far more restricted access to guns? Have rifles and pistols changed their behavior from yesteryear and they are now out committing mayhem and evil? To answer in the affirmative can be dismissed as pure lunacy. Thus, if guns haven't changed, then it must be that people have changed. Half-witted psychobabble such as stopping children from playing schoolyard games like cops 'n' robbers and cowboys 'n' Indians won't do much. Calling for more gun restrictions, gun-free zones and other measures have been for naught.

We must own up to the fact that laws and regulations alone cannot produce a civilized society. Morality is society's first line of defense against uncivilized behavior. Moral standards of conduct have been under siege in our country for over a half a century. Moral absolutes have been abandoned as guiding principles. We've been taught not to be judgmental, that one lifestyle or set of values is just as good as another. We no longer hold people accountable for their behavior and we accept excuse-making. Problems of murder, mayhem and other forms of anti-social behavior will continue until we regain our moral footing.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: guns; morality; persresponsibility

1 posted on 03/07/2018 6:08:39 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would add cell phone abuse as another example.


2 posted on 03/07/2018 6:16:34 AM PST by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etcb

You mean texting while driving? I agree


3 posted on 03/07/2018 6:24:17 AM PST by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3637661/posts


4 posted on 03/07/2018 6:27:58 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The abject fear by many of firearms rather than the judicious and proper use of them has led to a weird pathology among many people.

Kids are no longer taught firearm safety nor are they given the proper outlet to safely use firearms. Thus, when they do get the opportunity, it’s often in an unsafe manner.

Safely using and training on firearms removes the mystique and gives kids, especially boys the proper way to shoot.

This summer, I’m heading up a weeklong summer camp program. One of my requirements was a robust shooting sports program. Several of my leaders have gotten certified as NRA and USA Archery instructors (including myself)so we can offer a professional and safe program.


5 posted on 03/07/2018 6:37:10 AM PST by cyclotic (Trump tweets are the only news source you can trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes, and mostly young people. Of course, at my age everyone else is a youngster.


6 posted on 03/07/2018 6:38:14 AM PST by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How about more restrictions on alcohol and cars to cut down on drunk driving? It would make as much if not more sense as any democrat can come up with. Yeah - we tried the alcohol thing at one time but if we want some fun - let’s try it again. Watch the heads explode.....


7 posted on 03/07/2018 7:01:25 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
US Senate Candidate Nick Freitas Dismantles the Left in Defense of the Second Amendment
8 posted on 03/07/2018 7:20:16 AM PST by Delta 21 (Build The Wall !! Jail The Cankle !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etcb

By the way, from now on I am referring to semi-auto firearms, like a typical rifle before OR after a Bumpfire stock is installed, as a single-shot rifle, since one single trigger pull = one single shot. FULL autos would be multi-shot. Beat’em at their word games!


9 posted on 03/07/2018 10:53:56 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson