Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump to Review Ban on Military Personnel Carrying Firearms
Ammoland ^ | 25 February, 2018 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 03/01/2018 11:33:04 AM PST by marktwain

President Trump to Review Ban on Military Personnel Carrying Firearms

One of the Second Amendment themes Candidate Donald Trump campaigned on was that military personnel should not be made into disarmed and helpless victims.

President Trump said on Friday, 23 February,  he would be reviewing the current policies about military personnel carrying personal defensive firearms. From military.com:

President Donald Trump said Friday that he would review policies that keep troops from carrying personal weapons onto military bases.

“If we can't have our military holding guns, it's pretty bad,” Trump said in a wide-ranging speech to the annual Conservative Political Action Committee conference in Maryland, “and I'm going to look at that whole policy on military bases.”

“So we want to protect our military. We want to make our military stronger and better than it's ever been,” Trump continued in the speech, in which he also renewed his call for allowing trained teachers and military retirees to carry concealed weapons in schools.

When I joined the U.S. Army on active service, I had been competing in university pistol competitions for four years.  I knew more about pistol shooting and the civilian use of deadly force than my non-commissioned officer instructors. But, as a commissioned officer, I was not allowed to carry a personal firearm for self-defense… unless I was acting, as an additional duty, as a military game warden.

It struck me as a ludicrous example of hypocrisy and a direct contradiction of my sworn oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, that I, as a trained military officer,

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; ccw; military; nra; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Military personnel give up some Constitutional rights during military service. We should preserve and protect their Second Amendment rights in concert with military discipline.
1 posted on 03/01/2018 11:33:04 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Common Sense!!

I believe they are unarmed at the recruitment centers, also.

2 posted on 03/01/2018 11:36:24 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“President Trump to Review Ban on Military Personnel Carrying Firearms”

About time. Good.


3 posted on 03/01/2018 11:37:52 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Conservatives seek the truth. Democrats seek the power to dictate what truth is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I thought we fixed this in 2016 with DoD Directive 5210.56, Arming and the Use of Force.

http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/521056_dodd_2016.pdf

4 posted on 03/01/2018 11:44:19 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It’s been awhile, so I ask out of ignorance...
Doesn’t everyone draw a weapon and ammo when they get assigned to the next duty station ?


5 posted on 03/01/2018 11:44:58 AM PST by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

It gives commanders broad authority to limit this for their installations

The Joint Base San Antonio Commander has shut down any non-duty carry of any weapons

Other around the nation have done the same


6 posted on 03/01/2018 11:46:52 AM PST by 5Madman2 (Practicing random acts of Douchebaggery whenever possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 5Madman2

So bases are ‘may issue states’? OK, time to change them to shall issue.


7 posted on 03/01/2018 11:49:29 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Amidst all the good and bad that came up in that meeting yesterday President Trump was quite vocal and strong about the absurdity that military bases can’t defend themselves.


8 posted on 03/01/2018 11:51:41 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

I flew in the Navy for 21 years as a bombardier/weapons officer. I was never given the right to any firearm, even in Vietnam. Very strange system.


9 posted on 03/01/2018 11:53:37 AM PST by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks marktwain.

10 posted on 03/01/2018 11:53:38 AM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I thought we fixed this in 2016 with DoD Directive 5210.56, Arming and the Use of Force.


Purely for show. It was an attempt to claim they were doing something, while insuring that nothing substantial was really done.

It gives commanders the authority to authorize people to carry weapons for defense, but does not require them to do so.

There are a thousand reasons for commanders to refuse to grant soldiers the ability to defend themselves, and almost no incentives for them to do so.

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com.au/2016/11/dod-contingency-for-president-trump.html


11 posted on 03/01/2018 11:54:29 AM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Pretty much


12 posted on 03/01/2018 11:56:04 AM PST by 5Madman2 (Practicing random acts of Douchebaggery whenever possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: marktwain

But he does not want military personnel under 21 to be able to buy these weapons? I wonder how they will get them?


14 posted on 03/01/2018 12:05:19 PM PST by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I flew in the Navy for 21 years as a bombardier/weapons officer. I was never given the right to any firearm, even in Vietnam. Very strange system.I flew in the Navy for 21 years as a bombardier/weapons officer. I was never given the right to any firearm, even in Vietnam. Very strange system.

I flew Marine Corps Prowlers and we flew with 9mm's when over Bosnia. Same with crews over Iraq.

15 posted on 03/01/2018 12:06:24 PM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch; All

No, he should let his subordinates/commanders deal with this. At this rate of micro-managing, pretty soon he’ll be inspecting the White House rest rooms.


16 posted on 03/01/2018 12:06:53 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Midwesterner53

But he does not want military personnel under 21 to be able to buy these weapons? I wonder how they will get them?


Good poimt.

I hope people contact him and encourage him to be the candidate we voted for, the one who supported Second Amendment and was wholeheartedly endorsed by NRA.


17 posted on 03/01/2018 12:06:59 PM PST by Freedom56v2 (#KATE'SWALL Build it Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

What does it say about America when those who are trained in the use of firearms to defend the nation are deemed incompetent to carry firearms...?


18 posted on 03/01/2018 12:14:15 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

Except for being in transit, at every duty station, I drew a rifle and ammo...


19 posted on 03/01/2018 12:14:52 PM PST by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

sorry..meant to include you...see my post 19


20 posted on 03/01/2018 12:16:49 PM PST by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson