Posted on 03/01/2018 6:45:16 AM PST by dynoman
👍👍👍...exactly.
Why even go there? If he didn’t mean what he said, why even go there? It’s really hard to take this out of context. I’m sorry.
“They have great power over you people, they have less power over me.”
“Some of you people are petrified of the NRA,” Trump added. “You can’t be petrified.”
he didn’t reject national reciprocity, he just said that issue should be put into a separate bill, to prevent the dems from voting against any bill that comes out of this discussion.
He want’s them to talk. And He wants the NRA to talk. It’s simple. I’m observed the downside of being to petrified to talk in management where I work. It’s a negative on the company’s bottom line.
State government “seize gun first, due process later” already exit under domestic violence restraining order statutes.
Just saying...
Then why didn’t it happen with Cruz? Florida doesn’t have it?
Leftist phrase
And to Feinstein :”Dianne, if you can add what you have also, (your Assault Rife ban) and I think you can, into the bill”
Trump also said it would be discussed. That is the context you missed. You know what will happen during that discussion. So does Trump. It’s DOA.
HAHA!
Read post 60.
If you watched the whole video you would know the context. The link is in the first post. If you prefer to read the transcript for the proper context here’s a link;
No idea.
As for Trump loyalists… well they only had a few possible routes to take. They could say “he doesn’t really mean it”, they could say “he has a point you know”, or they could say “hmm? Gun meeting? No, I didn’t hear about that, hey have you seen Black Panther?”
#4 is "he never said those things (that we saw him say on TV) , those are all liberals lies."
and "Who you gonna believe anyway, me or your lying eyes and ears?"
Fact check this: If a new law says police can temporarily seize a citizen's weapon when a clear and immediate danger is identified, that BECOMES due process. It is not ignoring due process. @POTUS— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) March 1, 2018
That bears repeating AND, the case of the FL shooter, his writing his threats amounts to a FELONY, thus the sheriff, if he did his job, should have arrested him AND taken his guns until adjudication.
There ain’t a damn thing to talk about. Had the freaking laws on the books been enforced, this would not have happened. Talking means capitulation on our 2nd Amendment rights.
“sickoflibs (David Hogg calls the shots in the WH now) “
Just so we all know David Hogg is the one making Trump explode liberal heads by saying over and over we need concealed carry teachers, so bullets are flying back at the cowards who go into gun free zones to kill innocent unarmed people.
Ok. That makes sense. NOT.
#TrumpDerangementSyndrome
What laws would have stopped it? Be specific.
Check out the Scott Adams tweet in post 74.
The Baker Act. It’s illegal to bring knives and ammo to school. It’s illegal to point a gun at his Mother’s head. Threatening his classmates with physical violence. Shall I go on?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.