Posted on 03/01/2018 6:45:16 AM PST by dynoman
Yes he said that. It’s true. And in context not an attack.
Will he also call for removal of 4th amendment while at it? We were just into FISA violations, maybe he cares to make that moot too.
Trump is uttering out loud things Hillary and Obama mumbled because the latter’s intentions were truly criminals. That said Trump’s good intent is still paving the way to hell
Those who are having “visceral” reactions should go to the WH video and re watch the parts that are bothering them, then calm down and think about it for a while.
“He said Dianne Feinstein’s proposals and Amy Klobuchar’s proposals should be talked about/discussed”
Yep. Classic bait. The DCCC just told democrats that if they run on gun control they will lose. And here is Trump baiting them into submitting gun control legislation.
Best to ignore the sheeple. They get hysterical with their CNN articles but always come around.
Many ideas, some good & some not so good, emerged from our bipartisan meeting on school safety yesterday at the White House. Background Checks a big part of conversation. Gun free zones are proven targets of killers. After many years, a Bill should emerge. Respect 2nd Amendment!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 1, 2018
Keep deluding yourself for daddy.
“Trump is uttering out loud things Hillary and Obama mumbled because the latter’s intentions were truly criminals.”
Post a time stamp so I know what you are talking about.
“We were just into FISA violations, maybe he cares to make that moot too.”
Why would you think that? Follow his twitter account you would know that’s not true.
You can read the transcript of yesterday’s discussion here:
Don’t stay stuck on stupid.
Fox Business carried the entire meeting. We were alarmed.
Thanks! But you can’t see where Trump’s diss of Obama brought a smile to Diane Feinstein’s face in the transcript. She must know what a loser Obama was.
My view if your old enough to be in the Military carrying a gun into combat and risking being killed then if we change the age of gun ownership to 21 years old we should not be taking men into the military at 18,19,and 20 years old. The Voting age likewise needs to be 21 too.
Keeping guns out of hunters hands because of a mental case shooter is just wrong.
AR is the most popular hunting rifle, but its just that not, a military sub-machine gun.
“He attacked the NRA and flatly rejected national reciprocity. The only people he’s playing right now are blindly loyal freepers.”
Can’t back up or defend your comment so you post this;
“Keep deluding yourself for daddy.”
Cute!
I would suggest reading while watching the video of the discussion. I have watched the first 30 minutes and plan on watching the rest later today. I have not come away with a feeling of doom (like so many have expressed) thus far.
Well - if it ends up at 21 - Military should be allowed at age of enlistment, or thereabouts.
just watch Kelly Anne on Fox and Friends..she was “dancing like crazy” trying to defend yesterday..she actually mentioned Wal Mart and Dicks raising the buying age...go ahead and punish millions of 18, 19 and 20 year olds for something one maniac did..polls are even showing the public says the cops blew this. Pass laws that make you “feel good”..real smart...November will be a disaster.
So you’re saying he didn’t say congress was “petrified of the NRA”?
You’re saying he didn’t reject concealed carry reciprocity as part the bill?
Ohhh....kay....
You learn to be responsible with a gun in the military. That’s what’s missing with some 18 year old civilians, people like Cruz.
Our kids had Hunter Safety when they were in grade school. Did Cruz? I’d bet not, and I would further bet he had no gun training at all. I’d bet that most young people who use guns in a criminal way have had no training. This is why I can support moving gun ownership to 21 and leave military at 18. The military experience will provide training many 18 year olds might not otherwise get.
this is whats going viral...
http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/01/6-insane-things-trump-gun-control-bill-meeting/
Now you are moving your own goalposts from saying this;
“He attacked the NRA and flatly rejected national reciprocity.”
To saying this;
“You’re saying he didn’t reject concealed carry reciprocity as part the bill?”
Even though moving goal posts is a logical fallacy I can see you are self correcting because you knew the first one was a lie. Good job!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.