Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Russian Disaster
National Review ^ | 02/27/2018 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 02/27/2018 8:25:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Donald Trump has said a lot of silly stuff about Russia, from joking about Vladimir Putin helping to find Hillary’s deleted emails, to naïve musings about the extent of Russian interference into Western democratic elections. But far more important than what he has said is what Trump has done. That same caveat applies to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Start with two givens: Vladimir Putin is neither stupid nor content to watch an aging, shrinking, corrupt, and dysfunctional — but still large and nuclear — Russia recede to second- or third-power status. From 2009 to 2015, in one of the most remarkable and Machiavellian efforts in recent strategic history, Putin almost single-handedly parlayed a deserved losing hand into a winning one. He pulled this off by flattering, manipulating, threatening, and outsmarting an inept and politically obsessed Obama administration.

Under the Obama presidency and the tenures of Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, Russia made astounding strategic gains — given its intrinsic economic, social, and military weaknesses. The Obama reaction was usually incoherent (Putin was caricatured as a “bored kid in the back of the classroom” or as captive of a macho shtick). After each aggressive Russian act, the administration lectured that “it is not in Russia’s interest to . . . ” — as if Obama knew better than a thuggish Putin what was best for autocratic Russia.

A review of Russian inroads, presented in no particular order, is one of the more depressing chapters in post-war U.S. diplomatic history.

Just watching the film clip of Hillary Clinton presenting the red, plastic Jacuzzi button to Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov in Geneva remains painful, more so than even George W. Bush’s simplistic, reassuring commentary after he looked into Putin’s eyes. Under the Obama-Clinton reset protocols, Russia was freed from even the mild sanctions installed by the Bush administration, imposed for its 2008 Ossetian aggressions. As thanks, in early 2014, Russia outright annexed Crimea. It used its newfound American partnership as an excuse to bully Europe on matters of energy and policy, confident that under American reset, it would face little NATO pushback.

Russia assumed de facto control over large sections of eastern Ukraine. Its aggression sent nations of Eastern Europe and the Baltic States into a panic and raised fears of another Ukrainian-like intervention — thereby wresting pro-Russians concessions on the premise that it was nearby and unpredictably dangerous while the U.S. was distant and predictably inert. Russia succeeded in helping to dismantle previously negotiated U.S. missile-defense arrangements with the Czech Republic and Poland.

Russia since 2013 had sought to interfere in U.S. elections with impunity, so much so that as late as October 18, 2016, on the eve of the anticipated Clinton landslide, Obama mocked any suggestion that an entity could ever successfully warp the outcome of a U.S. election. (“There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections. There’s no evidence that that has happened in the past or that it will happen this time, and so I’d invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and make his case to get votes.”)

After a near 40-year hiatus, Russia was invited into the Middle East by the Obama administration. It soon became the power broker in Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq.

After a near 40-year hiatus, Russia was invited into the Middle East by the Obama administration. It soon became the power broker in Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq and to some extent offered passive-aggressive support for Israel and Turkey — a position of influence that it retains to this day and that would now be hard to undo. It posed as a “helper” to the Obama administration with Iran and helped broker the disastrous Iran deal — and then used U.S. acquiescence to Iran to fuel the ascendance of the Iran-Hezbollah-Assad crescent.

Unlike the United States, Russia had no need to maintain the nuclear umbrella, which protected the clients of the U.S. post-war alliance. Despite America’s nuclear responsibilities, Russia convinced the Obama administration to cut back radically on our stockpile of deployable nuclear weapons. Such promised reductions in deliverable weapons came at a time of massive U.S. defense cuts and cancellations, and delays in missile defense.

Russia was relieved by Obama’s efforts to stall fracking and make huge swathes of American territory off-limits for U.S. oil and gas exploration — as this would tighten global oil markets and enhance Russian petroleum export profits. The Obama administration inexplicably approved sale of a sizable portion of scarce U.S. uranium holdings to a Russian company, despite the fact that it was known that investors connected with the Kremlin and uranium interests had paid Bill Clinton $500,000 to give a speech in Moscow. In additions, the chairman of the so-called Uranium One consortium gave $2.5 million to the Clinton Foundation, a fact that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did not disclose, even though she had promised (during her confirmation process) to reveal all such possible conflicts of interest.

Most significantly, the Obama administration had created a false orthodoxy of détente, a politically correct Lala Land, in which to question any of these lopsided Russian advantages was to be considered idiotic or unpatriotic.

Mitt Romney learned that in the third 2012 presidential debate when he was tagged as a Cold War hack by a snarky Barack Obama for even suggesting that an opportunistic and conniving Russia was our chief geostrategic rival. Even when Putin became arrogant and greedy in his winnings, and finally, mostly through hacking, helped to collapse the disastrous Russian-reset misadventure, Hillary Clinton looked back on her role in Russian reset and made the astonishing claim that it had been a success: “I think it was a brilliant stroke, which in retrospect it appears even more so, because look at what we accomplished.”

Barack Obama revealed himself with an open-mic promise to outgoing Russian puppet president Dmitri Medvedev, which, by any reasonable logic, could only be explained as a promise by Obama to retard U.S. missile-defense efforts in Europe in exchange for good Russian behavior during Obama’s reelection bid. (“On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space. . . . This is my last election. . . . After my election, I have more flexibility.”) Had Donald Trump been caught in such a private conversation offering a Russian president a quid pro quo — massaging future U.S. national defense policy in a pro-Russia direction in exchange for Russian behavior that would help Trump’s electoral chances — he would probably be facing impeachment on grounds of real Russian collusion.

Advertisement

By the 2016 campaign, however, amid allegations of Russian hacking of Democratic and Clinton campaign communications, the Obama administration could no longer see its failed reset as “a brilliant stoke.” As a result, the architects of one of these embarrassing concessionary policies became not just embarrassed; she pointed to Trump’s loud bombast as proof that he’d colluded with and appeased the Russians. And so began the real collusion between the Clinton campaign and elements in the U.S. government to smear Trump as a Russian patsy.

The odd result of such failed reset policies and bought opposition research was a yarn that the neophyte and recklessly talking Donald Trump was a clever Russian lackey. Yet Trump’s strategic, defense, and energy policies, and his later appointments of realist Russian skeptics — such as General James Mattis, General H. R. McMaster, Nikki Haley, Mike Pompeo, and, yes, Rex Tillerson — were anathema to Moscow.

The Trump administration has armed Ukrainians, reentered the Middle East to bomb ISIS, squared off against Russia, and decimated Russian mercenaries in Syria. Trump also has ensured that the U.S. is well placed to usurp Russia as the world’s largest oil producer within about twelve months.

In just its first year, the Trump administration has armed Ukrainians, reentered the Middle East to bomb ISIS, squared off against Russia, and decimated Russian mercenaries in Syria. Trump also has ensured that the U.S. is well placed to usurp Russia as the world’s largest oil producer within about twelve months. He upped the defense budget, ordered the updating of the nuclear arsenal, bantered NATO members to increase their defense contributions, and traveled to Eastern Europe to bolster Western solidarity,

Given the media dismissal of Donald Trump and its eagerness to canonize Barack Obama’s eight years with another eight of Hillary Clinton, Russia by late 2016 went from a deity to a demon. It was reinvented as Mitt Romney’s enemy of liberal democracy, and, after the election, served as Hillary Clinton’s excuse for losing the election — and Putin became the new ally and collaborator of Donald Trump!

Thus spread the fertilizer that fed the national hysteria leading to the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate a crime — active collusion with the Russians to warp an election — that likely did not exist. And if it did exist, it was probably committed by Hillary Clinton, her campaign, members of the Obama administration, and the miscreants of Fusion GPS. After months of politicized special-counsel investigations, together with House and Senate investigations, Americans are only now being apprised of what we always should have known from the beginning:

1) Russia implants chaos as cheaply as it can inside the U.S. How bold it is depends on how much it worries about a U.S. response. During the Obama reset tenure, it felt there were no repercussions and thus few bounds to its disinformation efforts.

2) Like the Obama administration and the Hillary Clinton campaign, Moscow was convinced that Hillary Clinton would win the nomination and would be a shoo-in during the general election. Predictably, Russia invested comparatively meager resources to encourage pro-Sanders and pro-Trump campaign efforts to stir up trouble. It may have hacked into the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign emails, and perhaps it even found access to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private, illegal, and deleted emails to embarrass the likely future president and perhaps to find avenues for threats of future blackmail against her. Note well, that if the sure thing had happened — the election of Hillary Clinton — then no one but the Russians might have known, and possibly disclosed at a time and under conditions of their choosing, the shenanigans of Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele, and his Russian sources.

3) The result of the Russian-fed, Clinton-bought Steele dossier is as depressing as was the earlier Russian wins from the reset: The gullible and partisan FBI hierarchy is now discredited and compromised. The intelligence agencies, politicized under John Brennan and James Clapper, may soon share the embarrassments of the FBI. The critical FISA-court protocols have been undermined by deceit and untruth. The highest echelons of the Obama administration were probably complicit in surveillance of political opponents, spying that was predicated on Russian sources for a bogus dossier, and some Obama officials may well have committed felonies by unmasking the names of U.S. citizens and leaking them to the press.

The highest echelons of the Obama administration were probably complicit in surveillance of political opponents, and some Obama officials may well have committed felonies by unmasking the names of U.S. citizens and leaking them to the press.

The verdict on Russia, the Obama administration, and the Clinton campaign is now becoming clearer. Russian reset resurrected Putin’s profile and hurt U.S. interests. It grew out of a partisan rebuke of the Bush administration’s perceived harshness to Russia and was later massaged to help Barack Obama’s reelection campaign by granting Russia concessions in hopes of a foreign-policy success that would lead to perceived calm. Russia deliberately inserted itself into the 2016 election, as it had in previous elections, because 1) it had suffered few if any prior consequences, 2) it wanted to sow chaos in the American political system, and 3) it saw a way to warp Clinton’s efforts to smear Donald Trump, first, no doubt to compromise a likely President Clinton, and, in unexpected fashion, later to undermine an actual President Trump.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: collusion; elections; russia; vdh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2018 8:25:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Russia hatred is now being promoted by globalists. Since communism collapsed, Russia over the last twenty five years has been seeking the soul of its traditional culture, its religion and nationalist identity. Globalists abhor nationalism and especially do not want to have an American nationalist state and a Russian nationalist state. Actually capitalist, nationalistic, core Christian American and Russian nations would have far more in common than differences. Totally unacceptable to globalists who are doing all they can to rekindle American-Russian animosity.


2 posted on 02/27/2018 8:36:37 AM PST by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

You have nailed it.


3 posted on 02/27/2018 8:40:07 AM PST by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Russia and US were on good terms before 1917.


4 posted on 02/27/2018 8:45:47 AM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

VDH is a great historian and social commentator.

But he sucks as a political analyst.

This is little more than regurgitated Neocon spittle from NRO.

Russia has ALWAYS tried to influence US elections. Going back to the founding of the Soviet Union. They have even infiltrated high government office (Alger Hiss) in an effort to alter US action, and to spy.

There is nothing new to what Russia is doing. Nothing.

Yet what IS new is an administration using this known activity to justify spying on its political opponents, violating innumerable laws in the process.

And that spying is the only new thing here. Not a “resurgent, hostile” Russia.


5 posted on 02/27/2018 8:50:56 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Self serving Neo-liberal pap.


6 posted on 02/27/2018 9:03:19 AM PST by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Victor Davis Hanson just cut his own throat with a Russian blade imported for him by his loyal opposition Progressive Democrats.

I thought he was smarter than that, I guess they told him they'd respect him in the morning.

7 posted on 02/27/2018 9:13:29 AM PST by Navy Patriot (America returns to the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m pretty confident that the Russians will look out for the Russians.

Nations that compete with the United States will try to influence our elections and policies.

The American President needs to work for the citizens of the United States.

The Clintons and Obama work for Soros.


8 posted on 02/27/2018 9:28:16 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

There is actually a decent chance that the reason we have Smith and Wesson today is because of the Czar ordering 41,000 break top revolvers.


9 posted on 02/27/2018 9:34:00 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Agreed. Basically VDH story is that one day for reasons we never fully understood, Russia seized Crimea and moved into Syria. Not a word about us flipping them the finger in Libya and unleashing a Sunni insurgency in Syria to remove an ally of several decades. Next the McCain Neuland Soros nazi coup in Kiev designed to put NATO directly against their border and turn Sevastopol into a NATO navy base. Then the 2011 elections, Hillary HERSELF tried to get a color revolution going inside Russia.

Then we get the incessant whining of the EU about Russian oil and gas. The EU wants to own and run the Russian oil and Gas industry from wellhead to pipeline to end user. Ive never seen a customer so hell bent on dictating to a monopoly they buy from. (*and created by their own green policies)

Last, I think it is often underestimated how Obama’s homosexual past came into play here. The very first rumbling of discord between us and Russia came when president stompy foot bitterly opposed the ST Petersburg and Moscow anti-homo recruiting and parading laws. Obama and Hillary took that very personally.


10 posted on 02/27/2018 9:44:40 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: allendale

thuggish Putin ... autocratic Russia.


Meanwhile we strut about claiming America defeated ISIS, ignoring the dog’s breakfast that was made of the Middle East, and following the same jingoism that overlooks Russia’s massive role in defeating Nazi Germany.

VDH has yet to atone for his attacks on Trump, unless I missed something. Until he does, I’ll envision his opinions as if they were being read out loud by a clown.


11 posted on 02/27/2018 9:46:27 AM PST by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

The American President needs to work for the citizens of the United States.


Yup. And the State Department’s mission statement has to be changed from representing other countries to the US to representing the US to other countries. The former is the function of other nations’ foreign ministries, a nuance forgotten for the last fifty years ... and counting.


12 posted on 02/27/2018 9:50:22 AM PST by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Ever notice how they hate Russia and Trump’s vision of America equally? That is because those are the only two manifestations of the nation state out there.

The Globalists try to cast it as “America vs Russia”. Actually it’s occupied globalist occupied neocon version of America the Russians oppose. Globalists only love America when it serves globalism and leftism. It despises Trump and America looking after herself.


13 posted on 02/27/2018 9:52:09 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I agree with all of this, except that it omits the Seth Rich leak of emails as source of Hillary deception. Additionally, what are we doing about Hillary and Co.’s deception of America?


14 posted on 02/27/2018 10:10:34 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Russia has ALWAYS tried to influence US elections. Going back to the founding of the Soviet Union. They have even infiltrated high government office (Alger Hiss) in an effort to alter US action, and to spy.

There is nothing new to what Russia is doing. Nothing.

Yet what IS new is an administration using this known activity to justify spying on its political opponents, violating innumerable laws in the process. And that spying is the only new thing here. Not a “resurgent, hostile” Russia.

Bingo! It's also more likely the dossier was created to cover for spying on political opponents - Republican candidates - - than the other way around.

15 posted on 02/27/2018 10:34:47 AM PST by GOPJ (The 'dead vote' is a byproduct of fraud that "votes the people who don't show up".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
To cover up spying on political opponents, yes, but also...

To have an Alinskyite counter to the traitorous acts involved in Uranium One,

To create an atmosphere conducive toward an astroturfed impeachment proceeding,

To bind the new administration's hands in fighting off claimed scandal,

To make Democrats seem a better alternative to Trump (even suggesting a "viable way" that H-> could "yet become" president), as they look toward mid-terms and 2020,

To hinder--if not financially destroy--administration underlings through expensive legal responses,

To create a heightened, successor-to-MK-Ultra-like environment for a Nikolas Cruz or Jared Loughner-type to go on one or more lethal, anti-Trump rampages.

16 posted on 02/27/2018 10:53:36 AM PST by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“Next the McCain Neuland Soros nazi coup in Kiev designed to put NATO directly against their border and turn Sevastopol into a NATO navy base. Then the 2011 elections, Hillary HERSELF tried to get a color revolution going inside Russia.”

Our meddling in the Ukraine and in the 2011 Russian election is never mentioned in the MSM as an important precursor to Russia’s (clumsy) efforts to interfere in our elections.


17 posted on 02/27/2018 10:59:24 AM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
-- And that spying is the only new thing here. --

It's not new. The only reason it "got this big" is that the public rejected the uniparty offerings for the presidency.

18 posted on 02/27/2018 11:01:41 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg
Rescuing Boris - TIME Magazine - June 24, 2001

The outcome was by no means inevitable. Last winter Yeltsin's approval ratings were in the single digits. There are many reasons for his change in fortune, but a crucial one has remained a secret. For four months, a group of American political consultants clandestinely participated in guiding Yeltsin's campaign. Here is the inside story of how these advisers helped Yeltsin achieve the victory that will keep reform in Russia alive.

I understand that you were pointing to 2011 and later events. I'm just pointing out that the left is proud that the US meddles in the affairs of other countries, then is outraged over the 1st amendment.

19 posted on 02/27/2018 11:05:42 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking
Russia and US were on good terms before 1917.
. . . as witness the sale of Alaska to the US by Russia.

Also the purchase by Americans of the bonds Russia sold to finance the Siberia Railroad.


20 posted on 02/27/2018 11:35:09 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson