Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: China Moves 300,000 Troops Closer to North Korean Border
Breitbart ^ | 5 Feb 2018 | FRANCES MARTEL

Posted on 02/06/2018 10:06:48 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Report: China Moves 300,000 Troops Closer to North Korean Border

by FRANCES MARTEL 5 Feb 2018

China is reportedly moving missile defense batteries and troops closer to its border with North Korea, a potential sign that Beijing anticipates either a large refugee wave north or a military disturbance triggered by the belligerence of communist dictator Kim Jong-un. The South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo cited Radio Free Asia (RFA) in a report Monday, stating that RFA had compiled evidence that China had “late last year deployed another missile defense battery at an armored division in Helong, west of Longjing in the Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture.”

The “North Korean source in China” speaking to RFA also noted that Pyongyang had observed the movement of 300,000 troops closer to the North Korean border and “missile defense batteries near North Korean reservoirs by the Apnok and Duman rivers.” The batteries would prevent the violent outpouring of those reservoirs into China in the event of an airstrike.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 300000; china; nkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
It does not take much to move to N. Korean border. They only have to move a few dozen miles. Their military always keeps large number of troops there. With some additional reinforcement from other theater commands, it may not be hard to assemble 300K troops. Since they have quite a lead time, it can be done incrementally spread over many months without triggering a media headline.
1 posted on 02/06/2018 10:06:48 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; Grampa Dave; ...

P!


2 posted on 02/06/2018 10:07:24 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I thought they’d already done this in April 2017...150,000 at that time. Reinforcements no doubt.


3 posted on 02/06/2018 10:11:38 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

So what does this mean


4 posted on 02/06/2018 10:15:02 PM PST by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose
So what does this mean?

The end is near.

5 posted on 02/06/2018 10:23:46 PM PST by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose
They have almost finished their preparation for any military contingency in N. Korea.

If they cut a deal with U.S. to allow a military strike, they want something big in return. Such as defacto takeover of N. Korea and install their puppet regime. To make sure NK does not stray again.

Even when they ostensibly come in to defend N. Korea against U.S., that will lead to their takeover, too. They won't leave just because U.S. scraps the attack. Once they are in, they will probably rearrange the local political landscape. After all, they save NK from annihilation again, and it is not for free.

6 posted on 02/06/2018 10:24:05 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

All those options sound awful. So what should USA do?


7 posted on 02/06/2018 10:49:18 PM PST by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose
There is no cost-free solution to this problem.

If you absolutely want no shooting and no economic fallout, then scrap the non-proliferation in E. Asia. That is, allow all E. Asian states to go nuclear.

But I have a feeling that you don't like it either. Even more so for those in DC.

8 posted on 02/06/2018 11:00:18 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

In 1950 the ChiComs also pre-positioned troops on that border to help the Norks invade South Korea.


9 posted on 02/06/2018 11:56:11 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

As much as I would like to see reunification, China is a better option than the current regime.


10 posted on 02/07/2018 12:46:08 AM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

It means another 300,000 Chinese freezing their noogies off in the Manchurian winter. Other than that it’s anybody’s guess.


11 posted on 02/07/2018 3:22:53 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

These are the advance team. Part of a plan to see if the war can be won without firing a shot. I rate it just better than 50/50. If who flung dung is still too stupid to see the handwriting on the wall, the Million become the ground game.


12 posted on 02/07/2018 4:42:47 AM PST by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Refugees. Missile defense batteries. Uh huh.


13 posted on 02/07/2018 5:15:13 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; gandalftb; SunkenCiv
Why is China writing this:

China is one of five permanent members of the UN Security Council. China has an obligation to strictly enforce UN sanctions against North Korea. Naturally, as a part of China, Taiwan must abide by UN resolutions. This has been made clear in a recent report by independent UN monitors, who claimed they “investigated cases of ship-to-ship transfers of petroleum products in violation [of UN sanctions]... and found that the network behind these vessels is primarily based in Taiwan Province of China.”

In other words, if Taiwan refuses to play by the rules, the Chinese mainland should teach it how.

Taiwan is a component of China. Beijing has its duty and capability to oversee its behavior on the global arena. If Taiwanese people get into trouble overseas, Chinese embassies and consulates will provide assistance without hesitation. Once the island makes false moves on the international stage, Beijing also has the right to execute its administrative authority against it as it would for any other province of China.

More military forces should be deployed from the mainland in relevant waters so as to monitor Taiwan ships and even board and inspect them in crucial areas when necessary. These measures can be made public to all Taiwan shipping companies, which should be required to cooperate.
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1088537.shtml

Global Times = an official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party !

14 posted on 02/07/2018 6:26:52 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
They are building enough pretext to move against Taiwan in not so distant future. Can't do it if they are occupied with N. Korea, though.

It is one of the angles in dealing with China. What would China get in return for going along with U.S. regarding N. Korea? A puppet regime in N. Korea and the conquest of Taiwan, along with no trade retaliation? Or does China have to choose between Taiwan and N. Korea again? Certainly China wants to have the former, but it would be asking too much.

15 posted on 02/07/2018 6:39:27 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

True, they are trying the salami tactics: First get international OK to monitor, border and inspect KOR vessels. then...


16 posted on 02/07/2018 7:00:20 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
I envision that, at some point, 10,000 Chinese fishing boats sail to the coast of Taiwan asking them to ‘join the motherland.’ Directed by Chinese regime, of course. Either this or something similar will be done. It would be a part of political campaign. They also have pro-China elements inside Taiwan. They will come out in full force. Building the political momentum both inside and outside Taiwan and creating maximum chaos. It is from a typical communist playbook, so Chinese regime will probably do the same.

Then it is time for PLA to move in.

17 posted on 02/07/2018 7:08:25 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The Chinese have a long term strategy:

Mr Xi holds that China will remain permanently governed through a Leninist party controlling a one-party state. To suppose, as many in the west have, that China will gradually transform into something approaching a Singaporean or western-style democracy is the stuff of dreams.

Mr Xi outlines two grand objectives: from 2020-2035, China will become a “fully modern” economy and society; this to be followed by a further 15 years to 2050, when China’s quest for national wealth and power will come to fruition as it assumes great power status. This coincides with the centenary of the foundation of the People’s Republic in 1949. By then, Mr Xi plans for China to have become “a global leader of composite national strength and international influence”.

https://www.ft.com/content/24eeae8a-b5a1-11e7-8007-554f9eaa90ba


18 posted on 02/07/2018 8:05:47 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
I am sure that is their dream. To have their communist party remain in power permanently. It is quite another if that is realistic. But that is their only path for survival as they can see it now. You are right that people like Xi have no interest in China becoming anything resembling Western-style democracy. As long as they are in power, it won't happen.

I suspect that the current China would be gone before seeing the grand vision fulfilled.

19 posted on 02/07/2018 9:12:19 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

“Taiwan is a component of China.”

Not necessarily! There are those who say CHINA belongs to, and is a breakaway province of, TAIWAN!


20 posted on 02/07/2018 1:55:12 PM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson