Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crime Blogger Arrested Over Her Scoops
Newser ^ | 12/17/17 | Michael Harthorne

Posted on 12/23/2017 1:07:44 PM PST by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: iowamark

Is it “official information” if the cops don’t even have it yet?


81 posted on 12/24/2017 8:48:50 PM PST by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
Everyone has their opinion.

And a lot of people.

82 posted on 12/25/2017 7:31:45 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Edward.Fish

Dream on... the first amendment fully protects a news blogger from being arrested for publishing something the state says they wanted to release later.

14th amendment did indeed make the bill of rights incumbent upon the states.


83 posted on 12/25/2017 9:01:02 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ... we.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
14th amendment did indeed make the bill of rights incumbent upon the states.

Bit did the 14th Amendment explicitly alter the first amendment? Yes or no?
If 'no' then how is it that Congress can be held to mean state legislature?
If 'yes' then please show both where and how it did so.

84 posted on 12/25/2017 9:58:21 AM PST by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Edward.Fish

You are out of your league on this. You may not like the 14th amendment and many people don’t. But it very much does make it illegal for a state to violate the bill of rights. It wasn’t a panel of judges, it was the amendment process.
And even if you were correct (and you aren’t) The State of Texas Constitution still forbids this exercise in police state power.


85 posted on 12/25/2017 2:46:50 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ... we.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
You are out of your league on this.

Your assertion is without proof.

You may not like the 14th amendment and many people don’t.

I'm perfectly willing to treat it as an actual legitimate amendment; that, however, says nothing about agreeing with or condoning what the Courts have deemed the plain language to "really mean". (e.g. anchor babies.)

But it very much does make it illegal for a state to violate the bill of rights.

You're not listening — where/how does Congress become transmuted to be the legislature?

It wasn’t a panel of judges, it was the amendment process.

Again; I've not said anything against the validity of the 14th Amendment. — I have, however, said that there has to be some manner in which the First Amendment is altered in order to change congress into legislature.

And even if you were correct (and you aren’t) The State of Texas Constitution still forbids this exercise in police state power.

That is exactly what I said and, IMO, the proper level to address this case — please go back and re-read my posts if you disagree.

86 posted on 12/25/2017 2:52:50 PM PST by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson