Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: COBOL2Java
These ner-do-wells weren't arrested for protesting.
They were arrested for rioting and destroying property.
Idiots all.
29 posted on
12/21/2017 1:28:26 PM PST by
HotHunt
To: COBOL2Java
I would think that with about 200 arrests that the prosecutors have broken up the trials by charges and strength of evidence. Question is did they bring their strongest case first or are they going in reverse order?
39 posted on
12/21/2017 5:17:27 PM PST by
Tallguy
(Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
To: COBOL2Java
I would think that with about 200 arrests that the prosecutors have broken up the trials by charges and strength of evidence. Question is did they bring their strongest case first or are they going in reverse order?
40 posted on
12/21/2017 5:17:42 PM PST by
Tallguy
(Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
To: COBOL2Java
"... Superior Court Judge Lynn Leibovitz threw out each defendant’s inciting a riot charge — a felony that carried a maximum 10-year sentence.
Leibovitz concluded that “no reasonable juror” could find that the prosecution proved the six defendants encouraged others to riot.
The protesters faced up to six months for the misdemeanor rioting charges and up to 10 years behind bars for each felony destruction of property charge .... "
IMPEACH and REPLACE Superior Court
Judge Lynn Leibovitz for PREDUJICE AND INCOMPETENCE !47 posted on
12/22/2017 5:56:36 AM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson