CDC Data Manipulation Exposed: 4 Years Later

Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons ^ | 12/13/2017 | Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D. , P.E.

[Yaelle]

Read closely what I said. I didn’t say to not vaccinate. I implored my freeper friends to wait a year until there IS an immune system developed with full bacterial biome. (Honestly, I’d wait til age 2, but waiting until age 1 would be a huge step in the right direction and protect kids from neurological damage that may or may not show up in childhood but might show up in old age). It’s just a smart thing to do, to follow actual science.

Can’t read the study right now but from the looks it helps my argument. One day we will know everyone’s genetic tendencies right off the bat and our medicine treatment and prevention will reflect it for each individual. But right now, no one really knows their baby’s genetics. We must all ask as though our baby might have one of the myriad gene differences that lead to neurological problems, and attempt to FIRST, DO NO HARM.

[Neoliberalnot]

Do you have just an inkling of how many infants once died before the age of one when vaccines were unavailable? No, you don’t. I suggest you go through the infant mortality records for children under the age of one before vaccines became available, even crude ones, and now with the added safety of modern vaccines that are much more effective with fewer side effects. Most pets and livestock, and people, are vaccinated early when maternal protection wains. Tell me what you know about local immunity, cellular immunity and humoral immunity. Your claim that science supports waiting until one year of age comes from where? Your personal knowledge of pediatric immunology? There is no evidence based science to support this view in animals or humans. I know most of what is driving the anti science, particularly in medicine, are lawyers and their lawsuits. People like you professing expertise in something claimed to be self taught experts, are a danger to people who listen, especially people with young children. This is a practice that has been sold for centuries and charlatans have made lots of money. Here is a tip for you, just because you think you are in the know does not mean you are right. I’ve seen it thousands of times when students take tests. They think they have the correct answers to all the test questions. Oddly, why do I suspect you were never an A student in the hard sciences? You claim to koow the answers but you didn’t then and you don’t now.

[Yaelle]

I’ve NEVER seen evidence of infants being saved from death proven to be saved by vaccines. Whenever it was that human infants were separated from their mothers for both closeness and nutrition is when diseases really took hold of infants.

Maximizing a baby’s chance of surviving year one depends on one parent being near (providing/loaning/developing an immune system), and caution from the village. In traditional societies it is not by chance that when a baby toddles, his immune system is ready for exposure to other people and germs.

You cannot prove anything wrong with what I have said.

Sadly, you can’t prove vaccines for newborns (2, 4, and 6 months old) are beneficial, either. Pediatric groups support these early
Vaccines headlong for TWO reasons and two reasons only.

1. New parents are very worried about the tiny babies and really will bring them in to the expert doctor to assuage their concerns, so it’s the one time pediatrics can MAKE the babies come in for “well checks. “

2. Some parents chuck their newborns into full time group daycare, exposing them to horrible risks and even sending them
When immunocompromised (getting a cold, teething). Those babies in that sewer environment might even benefit from early
Vaccination even with the risks.

I’m correct no matter how many degrees I failed to get. And I have plenty. And no I didn’t get As all the time in college. But I bet I had more fun.

[Neoliberalnot]

Of course you’ve never lived in a 3rd world country where day cares and vaccines don’t exist, I get that. But you are selling your own snake oil. The salesman who declares “they know” because of some special power. What you proclaim as I said doesn’t make it so. Just as the C student who takes an exam, you miss half the questions in spite of what you think you know. This makes you a C student, nevertheless you can sell what “you know” to those that know less.