[wbarmy]

Given more ink is the Access Hollywood tape.

That piece of mis-direction bothers me more than just about anything else in this whole election. I still deal with morons who talk about Trump and his sexual assaults on women, that he "admitted" in the tape".

But when I bring up that Trump said "if he wanted to", they go berserk and start massive ad hominum attacks on me and my support of an assaulter.

The facts are still the facts, what he said on the tape, although a little tone deaf, were 100% correct. Most of the women claiming sexual assault now, allowed it back then because the men involved were powerful or famous. They are only crying now because the papers are on their side.

[papertyger]

But when I bring up that Trump said "if he wanted to", they go berserk and start massive ad hominum attacks on me and my support of an assaulter.

Classic.

My work environment precludes me from crossing paths with this type of person, but I'd love to be able to observe one first-hand.

[papertyger]

For what it’s worth, I have a dear friend, my wife’s best friend, who maintained Trump’s unfitness for President base on his making a qualified, inconsequential, claim that turned out to be incorrect.

Apparently, my cross-examination of her grievance caused her to cry, and I’m no longer allowed to challenge her on that level: on orders from my wife ;-)