Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
Is it necessary to use high performance stealth jets against third world narco factories. Wouldn’t relatively low tech drones be as effective against unprotected (read, non-anti-aircraft) facilities without the high maintenance?
7 posted on 11/25/2017 11:34:37 AM PST by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: immadashell

Kinda like real v. instant potatoes. With manned, taliban gets this is serious.


12 posted on 11/25/2017 11:53:37 AM PST by txhurl (Banana Republicans, as far as the eye can see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell

Saw the same kind of story that B-52’s were being used. It makes a headline by mentioning stealth for click bait. Would it be just more logical that what assets are available and taskable at the time gets the call? Seems more likely the source mentioned bombers and the 22 and 35 are able to be fighters and/or bombers, just like the 15 and 16.


13 posted on 11/25/2017 12:11:45 PM PST by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell

Rather than drilling holes in the sky; fighter pilots want to blow things up. It is what makes our day.


16 posted on 11/25/2017 12:31:35 PM PST by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell
Drones aren't low tech. A bombing mission is also cheaper, and they have the power of a few 1,000 lb bombs. One wants to vaporize the building and compound, and everything and everyone in it, not just a few guys in a truck.

Besides, the stealth planes don't give the Afghan Army a chance to warn their employers. The game rules have changed.

22 posted on 11/25/2017 12:46:15 PM PST by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell

I think the same thing. Losing one stealth fighter costs more money that all the opium refineries combined.


28 posted on 11/25/2017 1:15:50 PM PST by sparklite2 (I hereby designate the ongoing kerfuffle Diddle-Gate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell

My thoughts exactly, why is this expensive platform there.?


37 posted on 11/25/2017 2:27:51 PM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell

It costs a lot to use Low observable aircraft to target heroin factories but the chance to kill the operators in the factories is priceless


47 posted on 11/25/2017 3:47:32 PM PST by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell

And bombs make bad herbicide.

A fleet of cheap drones spraying vegetation killer and the problem goes away. Dropping bombs just plow the soil


52 posted on 11/25/2017 4:27:38 PM PST by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell
Wouldn’t relatively low tech drones be as effective against unprotected (read, non-anti-aircraft) facilities without the high maintenance?

So drones are low tech now. Never thought I would hear that before the teens were still here. I posted earlier, send in some hi flying B52s and carpet bomb them. A couple of well placed squadrons flying in at 50k feet unleashing hell on the unsuspecting goat humping 7th century POS should do a nice job. Wait for some sat pics and DO IT AGAIN until all the bees starve for lack of flowers to suck on.

72 posted on 11/26/2017 3:33:42 AM PST by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson