Posted on 11/20/2017 10:47:02 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
The data will always be “adjusted” to fit the premise, using new “studies” and any other handy method.
I get a lot out of realclimatescience. While debating a so-called climate scientist, I contacted Tony who put me in touch with a couple others, and they were a great help.
Somehow the most obsrerved thing in history goes missing and they just now discovered it?
Hi scripter! I don’t post as much as I used to.
That is a good site. Most of the other climate scientists have been chased away by the constant threats. Tough time for scientists.
Good to hear from you again. :-)
The Arctic is not the globe. Next.
You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here
Is the new under sea volcano in the arctic or anti-artic...
Odd; I seem to remember them disproportionately closing high latitude, high altitude, and rural stations because they were “distorting the data” in the undesired, cooling, direction.
So, now they claim that those lying stations, had they been left open, would show rapid warming.
IOW, the data was missing because they disliked what they were collecting, and quit collecting it, so they could later create ‘better’ data, to re-crook the straight record.
Gosh, such techniques would have made my science courses, and, later lab work, much easier. Start with a graph & data set, and work backwards until the equipment corroborated the final report.
ELLIE ZOLFAGHARIFART
Daily Mail UK ^ | September 8, 2014 | By ELLIE ZOLFAGHARIFART. Posted on 9/8/2014, 4:39:58 PM by Oldeconomybuyer. FULL TITLE: Climate change could ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3201936/posts
I see some patterns here, but I won’t be certain until I build a model to test the data points.
Depends upon which one you mean:
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2017/08/14/91-volcanoes-discovered-under-antarctic-ice-sheet.html
Scientists have found a range of 91 volcanoes under a huge ice sheet in West Antarctica.
A team of Edinburgh University researchers discovered the chain, noting that there could be negative impacts, particularly as it relates to ice sheets.
https://oceanbites.org/what-lies-beneath-a-gargantuan-volcanic-crater-in-the-arctic-ocean/
“Is there anything special about this particular region of the Arctic Ocean?
Indeed! The Arctic Ocean is home to the volcanically active Gakkel ridge, which is an example of a divergent plate boundary. Unlike volcanic activity on land (tall, conical, non-spreading), undersea volcanoes are linear, usually long and continuously oozing magma. The Gakkel ridge stretches for more than 1,800 miles at the bottom of the Arctic Ocean, and separates the North American Plate from the Eurasian Plate. It is the slowest spreading ridge in the world, with a growth rate of 1 centimeter per year. Additionally, it has an eerie landscape full of volcanoes, hydrothermal vents and exotic creatures (here is a PBS documentary on the ridge’s mysteries)!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.