Skip to comments.There was NO pause in global warming: Was caused by a lack of data (tr)
Posted on 11/20/2017 10:47:02 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
An apparent pause in global warming that spawned a decade-long controversy never took place, according to new data.
Between 1998 and 2012, the world is thought to have experienced a slower rise in temperatures.
This 'pause' has been cited by climate skeptics as a sign that the climate is less sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously thought.
But new research suggests the so-called global warming hiatus was the result of missing data from the Arctic, not a real downturn.
And the more accurate data actually shows that the Arctic region is warming up five times quicker than the rest of the world.
'The new data set and resulting estimates show conclusively that global warming did not take a break.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
FULL TITLE: There was NO pause in global warming: 'Slow down' in climate change between 1998 and 2012 was caused by a lack of data from the Arctic
Hmmmmm, sounds like those ballots found in the trunk. The ballots that elected Frankenweiner.
Not buying it.
Really wish journalists had to study in a real college to get real degrees before they wrote scientific bull Obama.
(Actually, my father never had a college degree, but could easily outthink these poorly educated jokesters.)
Satellites somehow disappeared during those years?
So they just finished making up the missing data to support their findings. How can the Arctic be heating up 5 times faster than the rest of the Earth and still produce record ice? This doesn’t pass the smell test.
Like lost ballots finding there way to the ballot boxes, not more data finds it way to the climate fear mongers.
You & I were thinking along the same lines. 8>)
Looks like they finally got all the records tweaked to conform with their models.
hmmm that’s odd- not long ago they were claiming that a satellite had ‘veered off course’ and was the cause of the ‘no warming conclusion’ and so they invented new numbers to make it look like those temps ‘would have been recorded’ had the ‘satellite been in the right spot’
In other word-s they pulled the ‘new numbers’ out of their butts to prop up their failing climate models
Brits are all in a tizzy because we don’t buy into the Global climate change scamola. They are all upset because they planned on our money.
Until then, enjoy your SUVs and BBQ grills.
The data was found in Chicago.
In the same boxes as numerous uncounted votes, nearly all for Hillary.
Yeah, we “fixed” the numbers, yeah, that’s it, new data has been added to arrive at our conclusion.
So: We thought we were wrong, but we made a mistake?
Ellie Zolfagharifart - takes guts to go through life with a name like that.
“Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.”
Don't you know anything? The satalites are in the pocket of big oil! /s
They are never wrong though, the debate has always been over.
And it only took them 10 years to discover the satellite was off course. “Well gee, it was supposed to be on autopilot...” 10 years without monitoring or follow up? Yeah, sure.
Where are they now?? It was 28 degrees here in Georgia this morning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.